Blog

NIS2 meets AI: Why AI governance is now mandatory

Boris Friedrich
Boris Friedrich
7 min read
NIS2 meets AI: Why AI governance is now mandatory

The underestimated risk: AI under NIS2

Most companies treat NIS2 as a pure IT security issue. Firewall, SIEM, incident response — the usual suspects. In doing so, they overlook the biggest risk: artificial intelligence.

Every AI system in your company — whether ChatGPT, Copilot, an internal ML pipeline or an AI-powered CRM — is an ICT system in the sense of NIS2.And this means that the same risk management requirements apply to these systems as to your entire IT infrastructure.

At the same time, the high-risk obligations of the EU AI Act will come into force from August 2026. Companies face a double burden that they can only manage with an integrated framework: AI governance.

Where NIS2 and AI overlap

1. ICT risk management (§30 NIS2UmsuCG)

NIS2 requires comprehensive risk management for all ICT systems. AI systems bring with them specific risks that are missing in classic IT risk analyses: hallucinations, bias, model drift, prompt injection and uncontrolled data access.

2. Incident Reporting

If an AI system makes incorrect decisions, leaks confidential data or is manipulated - is that a reportable security incident? In many cases: yes. The 24-hour reporting period also applies here.

3. Supply Chain Security

ChatGPT is a third party. Copilot is a third party provider. Every external AI API is part of your supply chain — and therefore rated under NIS2. Have you conducted a risk analysis for OpenAI, Google or Anthropic as a supplier?

4. Training requirement

NIS2 requires cybersecurity training for senior management. The EU AI Act requires AI skills training (Article 4, valid since February 2025). Two laws, one message: Anyone who uses AI must know what they are doing.

From August 2026: The high-risk AI obligations

On February 11, 2026, the Federal Cabinet passed the AI Market Surveillance and Innovation Promotion Act (KI-MIG). The Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) will become the central supervisory authority for AI in Germany.

From August 2026, the full obligations for high-risk AI systems apply:

• Mandatory risk management system for every high-risk AI system

• Technical documentation and logging

• Human Oversight – human control must be guaranteed

• Transparency obligations towards users

• Regular review and monitoring

High-risk AI includes:AI in personnel selection, credit scoring, biometric identification, critical infrastructure, education and law enforcement.

Shadow AI: The biggest NIS2 breach that no one is reporting

According to a recent Gartner study (February 2026), over 50% of employees use private GenAI accounts for professional tasks.Each and every one of these cases is potentially:

• A data breach (GDPR)

• An ICT risk as defined by NIS2

• A violation of the AI competence requirement of the EU AI Act

If your sales department enters customer data into ChatGPT, your HR department pre-selects applications with a private AI tool, or your developers use code from uncontrolled AI sources — then you have a NIS2 problem that cannot be solved with firewalls alone.

AI Governance: A Framework for NIS2 + AI Act

The solution is not a second compliance system in addition to the ISMS, but rather an extension: AI Governance integrates AI-specific risks into your existing risk management.

What an integrated NIS2+AI framework includes:

• AI inventory: Which AI systems are in use? (Also capture Shadow AI)

• Risk assessment: Classification according to EU AI Act risk classes + NIS2 relevance

• Usage guidelines: What is allowed in which AI tool - and what is not allowed under any circumstances

• Reporting processes: Integrate AI incidents into the NIS2 reporting structure

• Supplier evaluation: evaluate OpenAI, Google, Microsoft as third-party ICT providers

• Training: Combined NIS2 + AI competency training

• Monitoring: Ongoing monitoring of AI outputs and data flows

ADVISORI does not build a parallel system, but rather expands your existing ISMS with an AI annex. This saves 30-50% compared to rebuilding.More about our AI governance approach.

Frequently asked questions

Do we need to declare AI systems in the NIS2 registration portal?

Not directly during registration. But AI systems must be included in your risk management, which is checked during BSI audits.

Is ChatGPT a high-risk AI system?

ChatGPT itself doesn't — but the way you use it can be high-risk. If you use ChatGPT for personnel selection, credit decisions or medical advice, the application falls under the high-risk category.

Who is responsible for AI compliance — CISO or AI officer?

Ideally both in coordination. The CISO is responsible for ICT security (NIS2), an AI officer or AI representative is responsible for the specific AI Act duties. ADVISORI recommends an integrated governance structure.

Conclusion: NIS2 without AI Governance is incomplete

Anyone who implements NIS2 without addressing AI risks has a gap in risk management— and with it a liability problem. The combination of NIS2 (now) and EU AI Act (from August 2026) requires an integrated approach.

ADVISORI supports you in integrating NIS2 compliance and AI governance. ISO 27001 certified, DORA and NIS2 experienced, with its own AI platform.Arrange a free initial consultation.

📖 Also read:NIS2 in medium-sized companies: The 10 most expensive mistakes in implementation

📖 Also read:ISO 42001 certification: a complete guide to the AI management system standard

📖 Also read:NIS2 in medium-sized companies: The 10 most expensive mistakes in implementation

📖 Also read:AI compliance as a competitive factor

Hat ihnen der Beitrag gefallen? Teilen Sie es mit:
Sovereign AI on European infrastructure

Sovereign AI · ADVISORI

Frontier AI on European infrastructure

Frontier performance, entirely in Europe and under European law: as local language models in your infrastructure or orchestrated through Synthara AI Studio.

  • EU inference: no CLOUD Act, no kill switch
  • GDPR-compliant on European hardware
  • Live in a few weeks, no vendor lock-in
Further reading

Continue exploring with related insights from our experts.

Trustworthy AI Framework: The BSI A5 Core Module in Practice
Künstliche Intelligenz - KI

Trustworthy AI Framework: The BSI A5 Core Module in Practice

New EU requirements are turning trustworthy AI into a precondition that has to be demonstrated. With the BSI A5 Horizontal Trustworthiness Core Module, a cross-technology, cross-sector trustworthy AI framework is now available for the first time. This article sorts the 55 test criteria for AI systems by governance, data quality, transparency, fairness and security, explains the provider and deployer obligations under the EU AI Act, and shows in five phases how to establish AI governance in your organization, embed AI risk management and work towards EU AI Act compliance.

14 min readRead article
EBA Draft RTS on Operational Risk Management Framework: What Article 323 CRR Now Requires of Institutions
Risikomanagement

EBA Draft RTS on Operational Risk Management Framework: What Article 323 CRR Now Requires of Institutions

Published on 26 August 2026 as EBA/CP/2026/18, the EBA draft RTS on operational risk management framework converts long-standing supervisory expectation into binding minimum requirements under Article 323(2) CRR. This article works through governance, the management process and the assessment system, and shows how much of the work turns on a single figure: the EUR 750 million business indicator threshold.

18 min readRead article
The EU AI Act for Banks: What 13 Years of BCBS 239 Are Really Worth in the Age of AI
Künstliche Intelligenz - KI

The EU AI Act for Banks: What 13 Years of BCBS 239 Are Really Worth in the Age of AI

The EU AI Act finds banks on familiar ground: data quality, data lineage, model risk management, and human oversight are disciplines that BCBS 239 has required since 2013 and that the ECB has tightened in its RDARR Guide. The head start is real, but limited. Three requirements have no equivalent in the current framework: bias and fairness controls, the explainability of model decisions, and the fundamental rights impact assessment under Article 27. An assessment that identifies specific areas requiring action.

10 min readRead article

Your strategic success starts here

Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management

Ready for the next step?

Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now

30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available

For optimal preparation of your strategy session:

Your strategic goals and challenges
Desired business outcomes and ROI expectations
Current compliance and risk situation
Stakeholders and decision-makers in the project

Prefer direct contact?

Direct hotline for decision-makers

Strategic inquiries via email

Detailed Project Inquiry

For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance