Assessment planning and scope
We define a testable question with clear assessment boundaries.
- Specify datasets and periods
- Agree criteria and references
- Identify samples and limitations
- Hand over a test plan with contacts
Definitions, implementation and traceable results
We assess an agreed dataset against documented criteria and deliver traceable findings.
The audit is a bounded assessment of the existing data. It covers planning, access, traceable tests and discussion of findings. It replaces neither ongoing data quality management nor a separately defined certification process.
We assess an agreed dataset against documented criteria and deliver traceable findings. Assessment date, scope, samples and limitations are disclosed so you can prioritise improvements on a substantiated basis.
4 service modules
Bookable individually or as an end-to-end programme.
We define a testable question with clear assessment boundaries.
We perform agreed tests using a traceable measurement population.
We discuss results and potential impacts with accountable teams.
We provide a traceable basis for decisions and subsequent retests.
5 phases
We agree the dataset, period, criteria and evidence. Technical checks and business examples are documented. The final report distinguishes confirmed errors, unresolved anomalies and untested areas and identifies recommended next steps.

Your contact
Asan Stefanski
Head of Digital Transformation
11+ years of experience, Applied Computer Science degree, Strategic planning and management of AI projects, Cyber Security, Secure Software Development, AI
A data quality audit is far more than a technical data analysis – it is a strategic instrument for gaining transparency about the actual value and usability of your data. It becomes particularly valuable when technical findings are linked to concrete business impacts, enabling fact-based investment decisions for quality improvements. Our clients especially appreciate the practical, value-driven nature of our audit results and recommendations.
Assess an audit report by its boundaries as well as its findings: which data and rules were actually tested? A sample or a good metric does not establish that the entire dataset is error-free.
5 QUESTIONS, BRIEFLY ANSWERED
It records scope, data timestamp, criteria, method and evidenced results. Confirmed errors, unresolved anomalies and untested areas remain separate; no blanket assurance of error-free data is issued.
Scope, data access, reference information and business contacts determine effort. A test plan and dependencies are agreed after scoping, with missing access or references documented as limitations.
No. The engagement provides results for agreed criteria and data. A specific certification process or regulatory assessment would require an explicitly defined framework; the word audit alone does not establish that status.
We agree the role, criteria and evidence for the external assessment. An external perspective can complement existing review; independence, completeness and control suitability are not inferred from the appointment alone.
Suitable datasets have clear boundaries, named uses and testable criteria. We prioritise known issues and important decisions; assessing one domain does not establish the state of all organisational data.










Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
Direct hotline for decision-makers
Strategic inquiries via email
For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance