Structured AI governance for sustainable AI compliance

AI Act Compliance Framework: Systematically Implement Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Requirements

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act) requires providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems to establish structured compliance.

  • 01Structured AI governance with clear roles and responsibilities
  • 02Risk-based management of AI systems in accordance with EU AI Act standards
  • 03Integrated monitoring and control mechanisms for AI applications
  • 04Sustainable compliance processes for continuous AI innovation
11+Years of experience
120+Employees
540+Projects
ISO 27001certified

What does an AI Act compliance framework under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 involve?

An effective AI Compliance Framework is the foundation for responsible AI development and use under the EU AI Act. We develop structured governance approaches that systematically address AI risks while enabling innovation.

We provide comprehensive support in the development and implementation of AI Compliance Frameworks that meet the requirements of the EU AI Act while supporting your business objectives.

2 service modules

Service scope

01

AI Governance Structure Design

Development of a comprehensive AI governance structure with clear roles, responsibilities, and decision-making processes.

  • AI Governance Operating Model Design
  • Roles and responsibilities matrix (RACI)
  • AI Decision Authority Framework
  • Integration into existing governance structures
02

AI Risk Management Framework

Implementation of a systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and managing AI-related risks.

  • AI Risk Assessment Methodology
  • Risk-based AI System Classification
  • AI Risk Monitoring and Reporting
  • Mitigation Strategy Development

5 phases

Our Approach

We work with you to develop a tailored AI Compliance Framework built on proven governance principles and aligned with the specific requirements of your organization.

  1. Analysis of existing governance structures and AI landscape

  2. Design of risk-based AI governance architecture

  3. Development of AI policies and compliance processes

  4. Implementation of monitoring and control mechanisms

  5. Training and change management for sustainable adoption

Asan Stefanski

Your contact

Asan Stefanski

Head of Digital Transformation

11+ years of experience, Applied Computer Science degree, Strategic planning and management of AI projects, Cyber Security, Secure Software Development, AI

We develop AI compliance frameworks that go far beyond minimum regulatory requirements. With a structured and forward-looking approach, we create the foundation for responsible AI innovation — while simultaneously strengthening trust in AI systems among customers, partners, and supervisory authorities.
ADVISORI expert opinion

Our Strengths

  • 01Deep expertise in AI governance and EU AI Act compliance
  • 02Proven framework development across various industries
  • 03Integration of technical and organizational measures
  • 04Ongoing support throughout framework implementation

Expert Tip

A successful AI Compliance Framework requires not only technical controls but also a strong governance culture that embeds ethical AI principles across all areas of the organization.

7 QUESTIONS, BRIEFLY ANSWERED

Frequently asked questions about EU AI Act AI Compliance Framework

What does the AI Act require in a compliance framework for high-risk systems?

Providers of high-risk AI systems listed in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 must establish a quality management system (Art. 17), risk management system (Art. 9), technical documentation (Art. 11), automatic logging (Art. 12) and a post-market monitoring system (Art. 72). ADVISORI structures these requirements into an integrated framework with defined roles and responsibilities.

Why is risk classification the first step in a compliance framework?

Risk classification under Art. 6 in conjunction with Annex I and III of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 determines the entire regulatory burden for an AI system. Only once a system is classified as high-risk do the obligations under Art. 9 (risk management), Art. 11 (technical documentation), Art. 12 (logging) and Art. 17 (quality management) apply. Within the compliance framework, the AI inventory with risk classification therefore forms the foundation for all subsequent measures — without this mapping, neither resources can be planned nor conformity assessments prepared.

What are the key deadlines for AI Act compliance?

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 entered into force on 1 August 2024. Prohibited practices have applied since February 2025. Requirements for AI literacy (Art. 4) and rules for general-purpose AI models apply since August 2025. Full applicability for Annex III high-risk systems takes effect on 2 December 2027. High-risk systems embedded in regulated products (Annex I) face a deadline of August 2028.

What does the conformity assessment under the AI Act involve?

The conformity assessment for high-risk systems covers the quality management system, technical documentation, risk management system and data governance. Depending on the system category, it is performed as an internal check (Art. 43(1)) or by a notified body (Art. 43(2)). ADVISORI prepares all documentation and internal processes for the assessment.

How can an AI Act compliance framework be integrated into existing governance structures?

An AI Act framework complements existing compliance structures (ISO 27001, GDPR, DORA) rather than replacing them. Integration happens through a central AI inventory, role-based responsibilities (AI officer, risk management, data protection), shared documentation standards and aligned audit cycles. ADVISORI identifies overlaps and builds a lean governance structure that covers multiple regulatory requirements simultaneously.

What are the penalties for non-compliance with the AI Act?

The AI Act provides tiered fines: up to EUR 35 million or 7% of global annual turnover for prohibited practices, up to EUR 15 million or 3% for violations of high-risk requirements and up to EUR 7.5 million or 1.5% for providing incorrect information to authorities. SMEs and start-ups are subject to lower caps. A structured compliance framework systematically reduces the risk of penalties.

What steps are involved in building an AI Act compliance framework?

The process follows a structured approach: (1) AI system inventory and stocktaking, (2) risk classification per Annex I and III, (3) gap analysis against regulatory requirements, (4) quality management system and technical documentation setup, (5) implementation of monitoring and reporting processes, (6) conformity assessment preparation, (7) ongoing monitoring and regulatory tracking. ADVISORI supports all phases from initial assessment through operational deployment.

Sovereign AI on European infrastructure

Sovereign AI · ADVISORI

Frontier AI on European infrastructure

Frontier performance, entirely in Europe and under European law: as local language models in your infrastructure or orchestrated through Synthara AI Studio.

  • EU inference: no CLOUD Act, no kill switch
  • GDPR-compliant on European hardware
  • Live in a few weeks, no vendor lock-in