Systematic risk management for high-risk AI systems under Article 9

AI Risk Assessment under the EU AI Act

Our AI risk assessment supports you in the systematic analysis and classification of your AI systems in accordance with EU AI Act Article 9.

  • 01Systematic risk assessment of all AI systems under EU AI Act Article 9
  • 02Classification into the four risk categories with documented rationale
  • 03Fundamental rights impact assessment under Article 27 for deployers
  • 04Continuous risk management system with lifecycle monitoring
11+Years of experience
120+Employees
540+Projects
ISO 27001certified

What does the EU AI Act require for AI system risk assessment?

Article 9 of the EU AI Act obliges providers of high-risk AI systems to establish a documented risk management system throughout the entire lifecycle. Systematic risk assessment includes identification of known and foreseeable risks to health, safety, and fundamental rights, evaluation under intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse, and adoption of targeted risk mitigation measures. Requirements apply from 2 December 2027.

Our AI risk assessment service encompasses the complete analysis of your AI landscape — from initial risk identification through classification into the four risk levels to the implementation of continuous monitoring systems, aligned with EU AI Act Article 9 requirements.

2 service modules

Service scope

01

AI risk analysis and classification

Complete assessment of all risk dimensions of your AI systems with focus on EU AI Act Article 9 compliance requirements.

  • Systematic risk identification across the entire AI lifecycle
  • Impact assessment for various affected groups
  • Likelihood and impact scoring according to ISO 31000
  • Risk heat map and prioritization of action areas
02

Risk mitigation strategy and control measures

Development of targeted strategies for risk minimization and control, tailored to your specific AI applications and regulatory requirements.

  • Tailored risk control measures
  • Cost-benefit analysis of various mitigation options
  • Implementation roadmap with priority matrix
  • Effectiveness monitoring and success tracking

5 phases

Our approach to AI risk assessment

We pursue a structured, evidence-based approach to AI risk assessment that optimally connects technical complexity with the regulatory requirements of the EU AI Act.

  1. AI system inventory and initial risk scoping

  2. Detailed risk analysis with quantitative assessment models

  3. Risk classification according to the four EU AI Act categories

  4. Development of tailored risk mitigation strategies

  5. Implementation and validation of risk control measures

Asan Stefanski

Your contact

Asan Stefanski

Head of Digital Transformation

11+ years of experience, Applied Computer Science degree, Strategic planning and management of AI projects, Cyber Security, Secure Software Development, AI

Our structured Risk Assessment approach enables companies to advance AI innovations responsibly while simultaneously meeting the highest compliance standards. Risk management as an enabler for AI excellence.
ADVISORI expert opinion

Our expertise in AI risk assessment

  • 01Specialization in AI risk assessment under EU AI Act Article 9
  • 02Experience with risk management frameworks for high-risk AI systems
  • 03Proven methodology for AI risk analysis and classification
  • 04Integration of regulatory, technical, and ethical risk perspectives

Regulatory Update

The EU AI Act requires a systematic and documented risk assessment for all high-risk AI systems. Article 9 requirements apply from 2 December 2027. Inadequate risk assessment can result in fines of up to EUR 15 million.

7 QUESTIONS, BRIEFLY ANSWERED

Frequently asked questions about EU AI Act Risk Assessment

What does Article 9 of the EU AI Act require for risk management systems?

Article 9 EU AI Act mandates that a documented risk management system must be established, implemented, and maintained for every high-risk AI system. This system must cover the entire lifecycle of the AI system — from development through deployment to decommissioning. It includes identification and analysis of known and reasonably foreseeable risks, evaluation of these risks under intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse, and adoption of appropriate risk mitigation measures. Regular systematic review and updating is mandatory.

How does AI risk assessment differ from the fundamental rights impact assessment under Article 27?

The AI risk assessment under Article 9 targets providers and addresses the technical risk analysis of the AI system itself — health, safety, and fundamental rights. The fundamental rights impact assessment under Article 27 is an obligation for deployers of high-risk AI systems. It evaluates the concrete effects of AI deployment on fundamental rights in the specific application context, including discrimination risks and impacts on particular groups of persons. Both assessments are complementary and required for complete compliance.

What risk categories does the EU AI Act define for AI systems?

The EU AI Act defines four risk levels: Unacceptable risk (Article 5) — prohibited AI practices such as social scoring or real-time biometric identification in public spaces. High risk (Article 6, Annex III) — AI systems in sensitive areas such as employment, credit scoring, law enforcement, or critical infrastructure. Limited risk (Article 50) — systems with transparency obligations such as chatbots or deepfake generators. Minimal risk — no special requirements, for example spam filters or AI-powered video games.

What steps does a systematic AI risk assessment under the EU AI Act involve?

A systematic AI risk assessment comprises: First, an inventory of all AI systems deployed within the organization. Second, classification of each system based on the risk criteria of Article 6 and Annex III. Third, identification and analysis of known and foreseeable risks to health, safety, and fundamental rights. Fourth, evaluation of risks under intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse. Fifth, definition and implementation of risk mitigation measures. Sixth, establishment of a continuous monitoring and update process.

When must companies conduct risk assessments under the EU AI Act?

Prohibitions for AI systems with unacceptable risk have applied since 2 February 2025. Requirements for high-risk AI systems under Annex III, including the risk assessment under Article 9, apply from 2 December 2027. The Digital Omnibus on AI, adopted in June 2026, moved this deadline from 2 August 2026. Companies should still begin risk assessments early, as implementing a complete risk management system typically requires several months of preparation.

What penalties apply for missing AI risk assessments?

Violations of high-risk AI system requirements — including missing or inadequate risk assessments — can result in fines of up to EUR 15 million or 3 percent of worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher. For prohibited AI practices, the maximum penalty rises to EUR 35 million or 7 percent of annual turnover. Graduated maximum amounts apply for SMEs and startups. Enforcement in Germany is handled by the Bundesnetzagentur as the competent market surveillance authority.

What is the difference between provider and deployer risk assessment obligations?

The EU AI Act clearly distinguishes between providers (developers) and deployers (users) of AI systems. Providers must implement a comprehensive risk management system under Article 9 covering technical risks of the system itself. Deployers of high-risk AI systems must use the system as intended under Article 26 and conduct a fundamental rights impact assessment under Article 27. If a deployer substantially modifies the AI system or markets it under their own name, they become a provider and assume full provider obligations.

Sovereign AI on European infrastructure

Sovereign AI · ADVISORI

Frontier AI on European infrastructure

Frontier performance, entirely in Europe and under European law: as local language models in your infrastructure or orchestrated through Synthara AI Studio.

  • EU inference: no CLOUD Act, no kill switch
  • GDPR-compliant on European hardware
  • Live in a few weeks, no vendor lock-in