Systematic Risk Assessment to Recognized Standards

Risk Audit: Independent Risk Management Assessment

Professional risk audit services aligned with ISO 31000 and COSO ERM — independent evaluation of your risk management system with actionable recommendations to strengthen risk maturity.

  • 01Independent assessment of the effectiveness of your risk management
  • 02Identification of gaps and optimization potential in risk processes
  • 03Verification of compliance with regulatory requirements and internal guidelines
  • 04Actionable recommendations for improving your risk management
View services
11+Years of experience
120+Employees
540+Projects
ISO 27001certified

Professional Risk Audits for Your Organization

A professional risk audit goes beyond pure compliance verification. It provides you with an independent, objective assessment of how effectively your organization identifies, assesses, manages, and monitors risks. Our audits examine not only the formal fulfillment of requirements but also the practical effectiveness of your risk management in daily operations.

Our risk audit services include comprehensive assessment of all aspects of your risk management. We support you from audit planning through execution to the development of concrete action plans. Our auditors combine deep risk management expertise with practical experience and knowledge of regulatory requirements.

4 service modules

Service scope

01

Risk Management Maturity Assessment

Assessment of the maturity level of your risk management based on established maturity models and industry-specific benchmarks. We evaluate how systematically and effectively your organization manages risks and identify concrete development opportunities.

  • Comprehensive maturity analysis according to established models such as CMMI or RIMS RMM
  • Benchmarking against industry standards and best practices
  • Identification of strengths and development areas in all dimensions
  • Development of a roadmap to increase risk management maturity
02

Compliance-Oriented Risk Audit

Review of compliance with regulatory requirements for risk management. We evaluate the fulfillment of relevant standards and regulations and identify potential compliance gaps.

  • Gap analysis regarding regulatory requirements and standards (e.g., IDW PS 981, ISO 31000)
  • Review of documentation and evidence in risk management
  • Assessment of the quality and completeness of risk reporting
  • Development of measures to close identified compliance gaps
03

Process-Oriented Risk Audit

Detailed analysis and assessment of your risk management processes. We examine the effectiveness and efficiency of your processes and identify optimization potential.

  • Process analysis and assessment along the entire risk management cycle
  • Identification of process inefficiencies and interface problems
  • Evaluation of methods and tools used in risk management
  • Development of process optimizations for more efficient risk management
04

Culture-Oriented Risk Audit

Assessment of risk culture and risk awareness in your organization. We examine how risk aspects are integrated into decision-making processes and how risk-conscious behavior is promoted.

  • Analysis of risk culture through surveys, workshops, and observations
  • Assessment of risk communication and risk awareness at all levels
  • Investigation of the integration of risk aspects into decision-making processes
  • Development of measures to strengthen a positive risk culture

5 phases

Our Approach

Our risk audit approach is based on recognized audit standards and best practices. We combine systematic methodology with the flexibility to address the specific characteristics of your organization. Our goal is not only to identify weaknesses but also to provide you with concrete paths for improvement.

  1. Step 1

    Planning - Definition of audit objectives, scope, and methodology, identification of key risk areas and stakeholders

  2. Step 2

    Documentation Review - Analysis of risk management framework, policies, and procedures, review of risk reports and documentation

  3. Step 3

    Process Assessment - Interviews with risk owners and process managers, observation of risk processes in practice, testing of risk controls

  4. Step 4

    Analysis & Evaluation - Assessment of findings against audit criteria, identification of gaps and improvement opportunities, development of recommendations

  5. Step 5

    Reporting & Follow-up - Preparation of comprehensive audit report, presentation of findings to management, support in developing action plans

Your contact

Melanie Düring

Head of Risk Management

+49 69 913 113-01 info@advisori.de

Our Strengths

  • 01Experienced auditors with deep risk management and regulatory expertise
  • 02Independent and objective assessment without conflicts of interest
  • 03Practical, implementable recommendations based on best practices
  • 04Constructive approach focused on continuous improvement

Expert Tip

A successful risk audit is not a one-time event but part of a continuous improvement process. Use audit findings not only to close gaps but also to systematically develop your risk management further. Particularly valuable are audits that not only identify weaknesses but also highlight best practices and provide concrete implementation recommendations. Ensure that audit results are communicated transparently and that resulting measures are consistently implemented and monitored.

6 QUESTIONS, BRIEFLY ANSWERED

Frequently asked questions about Risk Audit

What is a risk audit, and how does it differ from a classic internal audit?

A risk audit specifically examines whether an organization's risk management processes reliably identify, assess, and control risks, rather than checking compliance with individual controls the way a classic internal or compliance audit does. The focus is on the effectiveness of the overall system: are relevant risks captured at all, are assessment methods consistent, do escalation paths actually work. A classic internal audit typically tests individual processes or controls against defined requirements instead.

What does a typical risk audit process look like?

A risk audit generally follows three phases: planning, which sets scope and focus areas based on the risk profile; execution, involving document review, interviews, and sample testing of risk assessments; and reporting, with prioritized findings and recommended actions. Scope varies with the maturity of existing risk management; a first-time audit usually covers more ground, while follow-up audits focus on previously identified weaknesses.

What methods and tools are used in a risk audit?

Alongside classic document review and structured interviews with risk owners, sample testing of individual risk assessments against the underlying methodology is common, as are maturity models that benchmark risk management against best practices. For data-driven risk management approaches, a risk audit additionally examines the data quality and model validation behind automated risk assessments.

How is an organization's risk culture assessed as part of a risk audit?

Risk culture cannot be measured directly, so a risk audit checks indirect indicators instead: whether risks are actually factored into decision-making, whether there is an open error culture around reporting risk signals, or whether uncomfortable risk assessments tend to get downplayed. Interviews across different levels of the organization are cross-checked against documented decision processes to surface gaps between stated policy and actual practice.

What criteria should guide selecting a provider for a risk audit?

Relevant criteria include industry experience with comparable risk profiles, independence from the risk management team being audited to avoid conflicts of interest, and the ability to assess both classic and data-driven risk management approaches. In regulated sectors, it's also worth checking whether the provider has experience with the relevant supervisory examination standards, since documentation and traceability expectations differ by sector.

How are audit findings effectively turned into concrete actions?

Findings should be prioritized by risk relevance and tied to concrete, time-bound actions with clearly named ownership, rather than remaining general recommendations in a report. A follow-up process that tracks the agreed actions at fixed intervals is essential; without it, many audit findings tend to stay unaddressed until the next audit uncovers the same gaps again.