Identify, assess, and manage operational risks under CRR Art. 312§324 and CRD systematically. We guide your institution through selecting the right measurement approach — from the basic indicator approach and standardised approach to the SMA transition under Basel III — and implement OpRisk frameworks with loss databases, RCSA processes, and KRI systems.
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
Or contact us directly:










Successful CRD Operational Risk Management transforms potential vulnerabilities into strategic strengths. It creates operational excellence through preventive risk control, efficient processes, and resilient business models.
Years of Experience
Employees
Projects
We work with you to develop a comprehensive CRD Operational Risk strategy that combines regulatory excellence with operational efficiency.
Analysis of your current operational risk positions and processes
Gap analysis against CRD requirements and best practices
Development of tailored risk frameworks and models
Implementation and integration into existing systems
Continuous monitoring and optimization
"Implementing advanced CRD Operational Risk Management systems is not only a regulatory necessity but a strategic competitive advantage. Our clients benefit from increased operational resilience, optimized processes, and well-founded risk decisions that enable sustainable growth and stability."

Head of Risk Management
We offer you tailored solutions for your digital transformation
Development and implementation of advanced AMA models for precise quantification of operational risks in accordance with CRD standards.
Building solid governance structures and control systems for managing operational risks in complex business environments.
Choose the area that fits your requirements
The Advanced IRB Approach (A-IRB) allows institutions to estimate all risk parameters internally — probability of default (PD), loss given default (LGD), exposure at default (EAD) and credit conversion factors (CCF) — using proprietary models. ADVISORI guides you from model development through supervisory approval to ongoing validation — for risk-sensitive capital management under CRR III.
The CRD combined buffer requirement defines how capital conservation buffer, countercyclical buffer, systemic risk buffer and G-SII/O-SII buffers interact under a single framework. ADVISORI advises financial institutions on buffer stacking rules, capital distribution restrictions, MDA calculation and capital conservation planning — ensuring full compliance with the CRD buffer framework.
Capital adequacy requirements under the CRD comprise the overall capital requirement from Pillar 1 minimum, SREP capital add-on (P2R), combined buffer requirement, and Pillar 2 Guidance (P2G). We support banks in supervisory capital quantification, preparation for CRD VI changes, and integration of ESG risks into the capital adequacy assessment.
The Capital Requirements Directive (CRD VI) introduces stricter requirements for governance, fit-and-proper assessments, and ESG risk management. CRD compliance requires end-to-end processes from suitability assessments through internal control systems to ongoing supervisory reporting. ADVISORI supports credit institutions with comprehensive CRD compliance: gap analysis, governance framework design, and regulatory documentation.
The CRD Capital Conservation Buffer under Art. 129 CRD V/VI requires EU credit institutions to hold 2.5% Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital above minimum requirements. When breached, the MDA (Maximum Distributable Amount) calculation triggers automatic distribution restrictions on dividends, bonuses, and AT1 coupons. ADVISORI advises on strategic buffer management, CRD VI implementation, and regulatory capital planning across the EU framework.
The Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) defines comprehensive governance requirements for credit institutions across the EU — from fit-and-proper assessments to management body composition and remuneration policies. CRD VI adds ESG governance obligations and enhanced supervisory board duties. ADVISORI supports you in fully implementing all CRD governance requirements, preparing for suitability assessments, and establishing robust internal governance structures aligned with EBA guidelines.
The countercyclical capital buffer under Art. 130 CRD (Directive 2013/36/EU) requires credit institutions to maintain an institution-specific buffer as the weighted average of applicable national CCyB rates. The calculation under Art. 140 CRD considers the geographic distribution of credit risk exposures. ADVISORI supports you with CRD-compliant buffer calculation, ESRB reciprocity requirements and implementation of CRD VI changes effective January 2026.
The Capital Requirements Directive (CRD VI) imposes comprehensive requirements on credit institutions regarding governance, authorisation, and supervision. We support banks in the strategic implementation of all CRD requirements - from fit & proper assessments and internal governance structures to supervisory interaction. Our RegTech solutions make your CRD compliance efficient and sustainable.
End-to-end consulting for implementing the CRD credit risk framework: from the reformed Standardised Approach (SA-CR) and Output Floor calculations to ECAI due diligence requirements. We support your institution in the compliant implementation of CRR III capital requirements and the strategic optimisation of your risk weighting.
The Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) is the core EU directive governing banking supervision, governance, and authorization of credit institutions. From CRD IV through CRD V to the current CRD VI, it defines the supervisory framework that each EU member state must transpose into national law. ADVISORI has been supporting banks and financial institutions with CRD implementation for over 14 years.
The CRD requires credit institutions to maintain a transparent disclosure process with clear governance. We support banks in establishing three-line quality assurance, drafting the disclosure policy and preparing for the Pillar 3 Data Hub — so your disclosure report withstands supervisory scrutiny.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) operationalises the CRD through binding guidelines on internal governance, remuneration policy, fit-and-proper assessments and ESG risk management. With CRD VI transposition due by January 2026 and the governance guidelines revision (EBA/CP/2025/20), banks face comprehensive adjustments. ADVISORI supports the structured implementation of all EBA requirements — from gap analysis and MaRisk compatibility review to supervisory dialogue.
Fit and Proper ensures that members of the management body, supervisory board and key function holders meet regulatory requirements for knowledge, experience, integrity and time commitment. With CRD VI expanding the scope to key function holders and the revised EBA/ESMA joint guidelines introducing AML/CFT competence requirements, banks face growing complexity in their suitability assessment processes. ADVISORI supports you with systematic implementation of all Fit and Proper requirements across the EU framework.
The CRD defines binding requirements for the internal governance of credit institutions – from the three lines of defence model through internal control systems to the independent compliance function. With the new EBA guidelines (EBA/CP/2025/20) and CRD VI, requirements for risk management governance, control functions, and organizational structures are tightening significantly. ADVISORI supports you with gap analysis, implementation, and ongoing monitoring of your internal governance framework aligned with EBA standards.
Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD IV) together with the CRR forms the regulatory foundation of EU banking supervision under Basel III. We support financial institutions in the full implementation of governance, SREP and Pillar 2 requirements — from gap analysis to supervisory-compliant implementation.
The German implementation of the Capital Requirements Directive IV places specific demands on governance, risk management and BaFin interaction through the KWG and MaRisk framework. We guide banks through full CRD IV compliance in Germany — from gap analysis and SREP preparation to the implementation of compliant remuneration and governance structures.
The use of internal models to calculate risk-weighted assets requires supervisory approval from the ECB and national authorities. We guide your institution through the entire IRB approval process — from model development and validation per the revised ECB guide 2025 to successful regulatory approval. With our expertise, you navigate the tightened CRD VI requirements, the output floor and internal model restrictions with confidence.
The CRD establishes binding liquidity requirements for EU banks — from the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) to internal liquidity risk management. ADVISORI supports financial institutions with regulatory implementation, liquidity governance and building robust stress testing frameworks.
The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) requires credit institutions to hold sufficient high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) to cover net cash outflows over a 30-day stress scenario. The minimum ratio is 100%. Under the EU implementation of Basel III through CRR/CRD, Delegated Regulation 2015/61 governs HQLA categories, inflow/outflow rates, and reporting requirements. ADVISORI supports banks with compliant LCR calculation, HQLA optimization, and supervisory reporting.
CRD Market Discipline creates transparency and trust between financial institutions and stakeholders through Pillar 3 disclosure requirements. As a leading consulting firm, we develop tailored RegTech solutions for automated disclosure processes, intelligent risk communication and strategic transparency optimisation with full IP protection.
Art. 4(1)(52) CRR defines operational risk as the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, systems, or external events — including legal risk. The Basel categories cover seven event types: internal fraud, external fraud, employment practices and workplace safety, clients/products/business practices, damage to physical assets, business disruption and system failures, and execution/delivery/process management. ICT risks (cyber attacks, system outages) also fall under operational risk and are additionally regulated by DORA.
The CRR currently provides three approaches: the Basic Indicator Approach (BIA, Art. 315§
316 CRR) at a flat 15% of gross income, the Standardised Approach (TSA, Art. 317§
320 CRR) with business-line-specific beta factors (12�18%), and the Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA, Art. 321§
324 CRR) based on internal models. Under the Basel III finalisation, the new Standardized Measurement Approach (SMA) will replace all three. The SMA combines a Business Indicator Component (BIC) with an Internal Loss Multiplier (ILM) to improve comparability across institutions.
The Standardized Measurement Approach (SMA) replaces BIA, TSA, and AMA with a single unified approach. Institutions must calculate a Business Indicator from three income components (interest/leasing/dividend component, services component, financial component). Above a Business Indicator of EUR
1 billion, an Internal Loss Multiplier (ILM) based on ten years of loss history applies. For banks this means: building or improving their loss database to cover at least ten years, upgrading data quality processes, and recalculating capital requirements. Institutions currently using BIA may face higher capital charges after transition, while AMA users may see lower ones.
A CRR-compliant loss database captures all operational loss events above a defined threshold (typically EUR 10,000) and maps them to the seven Basel event categories and eight business lines. Required fields include: event date, discovery date, booking date, gross loss, recoveries, insurance proceeds, affected unit, and root-cause category. For the SMA ILM calculation, a minimum ten-year history is needed. The database should be supplemented with near-miss events and external loss data (e.g. ORX consortium). Clear collection guidelines, regular data quality reviews, and a governance process for classification and validation are essential.
Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) and Risk Control Self Assessments (RCSAs) are the core steering instruments of an OpRisk framework. KRIs are quantitative early-warning indicators — such as number of failed transactions, IT availability rate, or staff turnover in key positions — with defined thresholds (green/amber/red) and escalation processes. RCSAs are structured self-assessments where business units systematically review processes for risks and control effectiveness. Both instruments feed into scenario analysis and capital planning.
ICT risks (cyber attacks, IT outages, third-party disruptions) are a subset of operational risk. Since January 2025, DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) imposes additional requirements: an ICT risk management framework, incident reporting within 4/24/72 hours, regular Threat-Led Penetration Tests (TLPT), ICT third-party risk management, and a register of information on all ICT service providers. Integrating DORA into the existing OpRisk framework requires: extending the risk taxonomy with ICT-specific categories, adding IT-related KRIs, supplementing scenario analysis with cyber scenarios, and aligning incident processes between OpRisk and DORA reporting.
Discover how we support companies in their digital transformation
Klöckner & Co
Digital Transformation in Steel Trading

Siemens
Smart Manufacturing Solutions for Maximum Value Creation

Festo
Intelligent Networking for Future-Proof Production Systems

Bosch
AI Process Optimization for Improved Production Efficiency

Is your organization ready for the next step into the digital future? Contact us for a personal consultation.
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
Direct hotline for decision-makers
Strategic inquiries via email
For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance