ADVISORI Logo
BlogCase StudiesAbout Us
info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01
  1. Home/
  2. Services/
  3. Regulatory Compliance Management/
  4. Crr Crd/
  5. Crr Crd Implementation/
  6. Crr Crd Srep Vorbereitung Dokumentation En

Newsletter abonnieren

Bleiben Sie auf dem Laufenden mit den neuesten Trends und Entwicklungen

Durch Abonnieren stimmen Sie unseren Datenschutzbestimmungen zu.

A
ADVISORI FTC GmbH

Transformation. Innovation. Sicherheit.

Firmenadresse

Kaiserstraße 44

60329 Frankfurt am Main

Deutschland

Auf Karte ansehen

Kontakt

info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01

Mo-Fr: 9:00 - 18:00 Uhr

Unternehmen

Leistungen

Social Media

Folgen Sie uns und bleiben Sie auf dem neuesten Stand.

  • /
  • /

© 2024 ADVISORI FTC GmbH. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Your browser does not support the video tag.
Optimal positioning in the supervisory review and evaluation process

CRR/CRD SREP Preparation & Documentation

The Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) is a central element of banking supervision under CRR/CRD. Thorough preparation and comprehensive documentation are essential for a positive outcome. We support you in the systematic preparation and professional documentation of your SREP-relevant processes and controls.

  • ✓Structured preparation for all aspects of the SREP
  • ✓Professional documentation of regulatory processes and controls
  • ✓Traceable presentation of governance and risk management
  • ✓Optimal positioning vis-à-vis the supervisory authorities

Your strategic success starts here

Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management

30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available

For optimal preparation of your strategy session:

  • Your strategic goals and objectives
  • Desired business outcomes and ROI
  • Steps already taken

Or contact us directly:

info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01

Certifications, Partners and more...

ISO 9001 CertifiedISO 27001 CertifiedISO 14001 CertifiedBeyondTrust PartnerBVMW Bundesverband MitgliedMitigant PartnerGoogle PartnerTop 100 InnovatorMicrosoft AzureAmazon Web Services

CRR/CRD SREP Preparation & Documentation

Our Strengths

  • Extensive experience with SREP reviews across various banking groups
  • Deep understanding of supervisory expectations and assessment criteria
  • Practice-tested methodology for efficient SREP preparation
  • Experienced team with backgrounds in supervision and banking practice
⚠

Expert tip

High-quality SREP documentation should not only fulfill formal requirements, but also highlight the specific features of your business model and risk management approaches. Demonstrate proactively how you have integrated regulatory requirements into your business processes and what measures you have implemented for continuous improvement.

ADVISORI in Numbers

11+

Years of Experience

120+

Employees

520+

Projects

Our proven methodology for SREP preparation and documentation ensures that all relevant aspects are systematically addressed and that your institution is optimally prepared for the supervisory review and evaluation process.

Our Approach:

Stocktaking: Recording and assessing existing SREP-relevant documentation and identifying gaps

Prioritization: Defining areas of focus based on supervisory requirements and institution-specific risks

Documentation creation: Structured preparation of existing documents and creation of missing documents in accordance with supervisory standards

Quality assurance: Critical review of all documents for completeness, consistency, and persuasiveness

Simulations: Conducting mock interviews and examination simulations for targeted preparation

"Professional SREP preparation and documentation is more than just compliance – it is a strategic opportunity to strengthen supervisory confidence and engage in the regulatory dialogue on equal terms. Our experience shows that high-quality documentation and convincing evidence make a significant contribution to success in the SREP process and can help avoid potential supervisory measures."
Andreas Krekel

Andreas Krekel

Head of Risk Management, Regulatory Reporting

Expertise & Experience:

10+ years of experience, SQL, R-Studio, BAIS-MSG, ABACUS, SAPBA, HPQC, JIRA, MS Office, SAS, Business Process Manager, IBM Operational Decision Management

LinkedIn Profile

Our Services

We offer you tailored solutions for your digital transformation

SREP Documentation Gap Analysis

We systematically analyze your existing documentation for completeness, quality, and persuasiveness with regard to SREP requirements and identify optimization potential.

  • Comprehensive stocktaking of SREP-relevant documentation
  • Comparison with current supervisory requirements and best practices
  • Identification of documentation gaps and weaknesses
  • Prioritization of areas for action and measure planning

SREP Documentation Creation and Optimization

We support you in creating missing and optimizing existing SREP-relevant documentation in accordance with supervisory standards and best practices.

  • Creation of structured and convincing SREP documentation
  • Optimization of existing documents for maximum effectiveness
  • Consistency review across different documents and departments
  • Development of documentation standards and templates for future requirements

SREP Review Preparation and Support

We prepare your institution and your staff specifically for the SREP process and support you during the review in responding to supervisory requests.

  • Training and coaching of SREP-relevant staff and managers
  • Conducting mock interviews and examination simulations
  • Support in responding to supervisory requests during the review
  • Follow-up of review results and implementation of improvement measures

Looking for a complete overview of all our services?

View Complete Service Overview

Our Areas of Expertise in Regulatory Compliance Management

Our expertise in managing regulatory compliance and transformation, including DORA.

Apply for Banking License

Further information on applying for a banking license.

▼
    • Banking License Governance Organizational Structure
      • Banking License Supervisory Board Executive Roles
      • Banking License ICS Compliance Functions
      • Banking License Control Management Processes
    • Banking License Preliminary Study
      • Banking License Feasibility Business Plan
      • Banking License Capital Requirements Budgeting
      • Banking License Risk Opportunity Analysis
Basel III

Further information on Basel III.

▼
    • Basel III Implementation
      • Basel III Adaptation of Internal Risk Models
      • Basel III Implementation of Stress Tests Scenario Analyses
      • Basel III Reporting Compliance Procedures
    • Basel III Ongoing Compliance
      • Basel III Internal External Audit Support
      • Basel III Continuous Review of Metrics
      • Basel III Monitoring of Supervisory Changes
    • Basel III Readiness
      • Basel III Introduction of New Metrics Countercyclical Buffer Etc
      • Basel III Gap Analysis Implementation Roadmap
      • Basel III Capital and Liquidity Requirements Leverage Ratio LCR NSFR
BCBS 239

Further information on BCBS 239.

▼
    • BCBS 239 Implementation
      • BCBS 239 IT Process Adjustments
      • BCBS 239 Risk Data Aggregation Automated Reporting
      • BCBS 239 Testing Validation
    • BCBS 239 Ongoing Compliance
      • BCBS 239 Audit Pruefungsunterstuetzung
      • BCBS 239 Kontinuierliche Prozessoptimierung
      • BCBS 239 Monitoring KPI Tracking
    • BCBS 239 Readiness
      • BCBS 239 Data Governance Rollen
      • BCBS 239 Gap Analyse Zielbild
      • BCBS 239 Ist Analyse Datenarchitektur
CIS Controls

Weitere Informationen zu CIS Controls.

▼
    • CIS Controls Kontrolle Reifegradbewertung
    • CIS Controls Priorisierung Risikoanalys
    • CIS Controls Umsetzung Top 20 Controls
Cloud Compliance

Weitere Informationen zu Cloud Compliance.

▼
    • Cloud Compliance Audits Zertifizierungen ISO SOC2
    • Cloud Compliance Cloud Sicherheitsarchitektur SLA Management
    • Cloud Compliance Hybrid Und Multi Cloud Governance
CRA Cyber Resilience Act

Weitere Informationen zu CRA Cyber Resilience Act.

▼
    • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Conformity Assessment
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act CE Marking
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act External Audits
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Self Assessment
    • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Market Surveillance
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Corrective Actions
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Product Registration
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Regulatory Controls
    • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Product Security Requirements
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Security By Default
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Security By Design
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Update Management
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Vulnerability Management
CRR CRD

Weitere Informationen zu CRR CRD.

▼
    • CRR CRD Implementation
      • CRR CRD Offenlegungsanforderungen Pillar III
      • CRR CRD SREP Vorbereitung Dokumentation
    • CRR CRD Ongoing Compliance
      • CRR CRD Reporting Kommunikation Mit Aufsichtsbehoerden
      • CRR CRD Risikosteuerung Validierung
      • CRR CRD Schulungen Change Management
    • CRR CRD Readiness
      • CRR CRD Gap Analyse Prozesse Systeme
      • CRR CRD Kapital Liquiditaetsplanung ICAAP ILAAP
      • CRR CRD RWA Berechnung Methodik
Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung

Weitere Informationen zu Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung.

▼
    • Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung Grundlagen DSGVO BDSG
    • Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung Incident Management Meldepflichten
    • Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung Datenschutzprozesse Dokumentation
    • Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung Rollen Verantwortlichkeiten Koordinator Vs DPO
DORA Digital Operational Resilience Act

Stärken Sie Ihre digitale operationelle Widerstandsfähigkeit gemäß DORA.

▼
    • DORA Compliance
      • Audit Readiness
      • Control Implementation
      • Documentation Framework
      • Monitoring Reporting
      • Training Awareness
    • DORA Implementation
      • Gap Analyse Assessment
      • ICT Risk Management Framework
      • Implementation Roadmap
      • Incident Reporting System
      • Third Party Risk Management
    • DORA Requirements
      • Digital Operational Resilience Testing
      • ICT Incident Management
      • ICT Risk Management
      • ICT Third Party Risk
      • Information Sharing
DSGVO

Weitere Informationen zu DSGVO.

▼
    • DSGVO Implementation
      • DSGVO Datenschutz Folgenabschaetzung DPIA
      • DSGVO Prozesse Fuer Meldung Von Datenschutzverletzungen
      • DSGVO Technische Organisatorische Massnahmen
    • DSGVO Ongoing Compliance
      • DSGVO Laufende Audits Kontrollen
      • DSGVO Schulungen Awareness Programme
      • DSGVO Zusammenarbeit Mit Aufsichtsbehoerden
    • DSGVO Readiness
      • DSGVO Datenschutz Analyse Gap Assessment
      • DSGVO Privacy By Design Default
      • DSGVO Rollen Verantwortlichkeiten DPO Koordinator
EBA

Weitere Informationen zu EBA.

▼
    • EBA Guidelines Implementation
      • EBA FINREP COREP Anpassungen
      • EBA Governance Outsourcing ESG Vorgaben
      • EBA Self Assessments Gap Analysen
    • EBA Ongoing Compliance
      • EBA Mitarbeiterschulungen Sensibilisierung
      • EBA Monitoring Von EBA Updates
      • EBA Remediation Kontinuierliche Verbesserung
    • EBA SREP Readiness
      • EBA Dokumentations Und Prozessoptimierung
      • EBA Eskalations Kommunikationsstrukturen
      • EBA Pruefungsmanagement Follow Up
EU AI Act

Weitere Informationen zu EU AI Act.

▼
    • EU AI Act AI Compliance Framework
      • EU AI Act Algorithmic Assessment
      • EU AI Act Bias Testing
      • EU AI Act Ethics Guidelines
      • EU AI Act Quality Management
      • EU AI Act Transparency Requirements
    • EU AI Act AI Risk Classification
      • EU AI Act Compliance Requirements
      • EU AI Act Documentation Requirements
      • EU AI Act Monitoring Systems
      • EU AI Act Risk Assessment
      • EU AI Act System Classification
    • EU AI Act High Risk AI Systems
      • EU AI Act Data Governance
      • EU AI Act Human Oversight
      • EU AI Act Record Keeping
      • EU AI Act Risk Management System
      • EU AI Act Technical Documentation
FRTB

Weitere Informationen zu FRTB.

▼
    • FRTB Implementation
      • FRTB Marktpreisrisikomodelle Validierung
      • FRTB Reporting Compliance Framework
      • FRTB Risikodatenerhebung Datenqualitaet
    • FRTB Ongoing Compliance
      • FRTB Audit Unterstuetzung Dokumentation
      • FRTB Prozessoptimierung Schulungen
      • FRTB Ueberwachung Re Kalibrierung Der Modelle
    • FRTB Readiness
      • FRTB Auswahl Standard Approach Vs Internal Models
      • FRTB Gap Analyse Daten Prozesse
      • FRTB Neuausrichtung Handels Bankbuch Abgrenzung
ISO 27001

Weitere Informationen zu ISO 27001.

▼
    • ISO 27001 Internes Audit Zertifizierungsvorbereitung
    • ISO 27001 ISMS Einfuehrung Annex A Controls
    • ISO 27001 Reifegradbewertung Kontinuierliche Verbesserung
IT Grundschutz BSI

Weitere Informationen zu IT Grundschutz BSI.

▼
    • IT Grundschutz BSI BSI Standards Kompendium
    • IT Grundschutz BSI Frameworks Struktur Baustein Analyse
    • IT Grundschutz BSI Zertifizierungsbegleitung Audit Support
KRITIS

Weitere Informationen zu KRITIS.

▼
    • KRITIS Implementation
      • KRITIS Kontinuierliche Ueberwachung Incident Management
      • KRITIS Meldepflichten Behoerdenkommunikation
      • KRITIS Schutzkonzepte Physisch Digital
    • KRITIS Ongoing Compliance
      • KRITIS Prozessanpassungen Bei Neuen Bedrohungen
      • KRITIS Regelmaessige Tests Audits
      • KRITIS Schulungen Awareness Kampagnen
    • KRITIS Readiness
      • KRITIS Gap Analyse Organisation Technik
      • KRITIS Notfallkonzepte Ressourcenplanung
      • KRITIS Schwachstellenanalyse Risikobewertung
MaRisk

Weitere Informationen zu MaRisk.

▼
    • MaRisk Implementation
      • MaRisk Dokumentationsanforderungen Prozess Kontrollbeschreibungen
      • MaRisk IKS Verankerung
      • MaRisk Risikosteuerungs Tools Integration
    • MaRisk Ongoing Compliance
      • MaRisk Audit Readiness
      • MaRisk Schulungen Sensibilisierung
      • MaRisk Ueberwachung Reporting
    • MaRisk Readiness
      • MaRisk Gap Analyse
      • MaRisk Organisations Steuerungsprozesse
      • MaRisk Ressourcenkonzept Fach IT Kapazitaeten
MiFID

Weitere Informationen zu MiFID.

▼
    • MiFID Implementation
      • MiFID Anpassung Vertriebssteuerung Prozessablaeufe
      • MiFID Dokumentation IT Anbindung
      • MiFID Transparenz Berichtspflichten RTS 27 28
    • MiFID II Readiness
      • MiFID Best Execution Transaktionsueberwachung
      • MiFID Gap Analyse Roadmap
      • MiFID Produkt Anlegerschutz Zielmarkt Geeignetheitspruefung
    • MiFID Ongoing Compliance
      • MiFID Anpassung An Neue ESMA BAFIN Vorgaben
      • MiFID Fortlaufende Schulungen Monitoring
      • MiFID Regelmaessige Kontrollen Audits
NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Weitere Informationen zu NIST Cybersecurity Framework.

▼
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework Identify Protect Detect Respond Recover
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework Integration In Unternehmensprozesse
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework Maturity Assessment Roadmap
NIS2

Weitere Informationen zu NIS2.

▼
    • NIS2 Readiness
      • NIS2 Compliance Roadmap
      • NIS2 Gap Analyse
      • NIS2 Implementation Strategy
      • NIS2 Risk Management Framework
      • NIS2 Scope Assessment
    • NIS2 Sector Specific Requirements
      • NIS2 Authority Communication
      • NIS2 Cross Border Cooperation
      • NIS2 Essential Entities
      • NIS2 Important Entities
      • NIS2 Reporting Requirements
    • NIS2 Security Measures
      • NIS2 Business Continuity Management
      • NIS2 Crisis Management
      • NIS2 Incident Handling
      • NIS2 Risk Analysis Systems
      • NIS2 Supply Chain Security
Privacy Program

Weitere Informationen zu Privacy Program.

▼
    • Privacy Program Drittdienstleistermanagement
      • Privacy Program Datenschutzrisiko Bewertung Externer Partner
      • Privacy Program Rezertifizierung Onboarding Prozesse
      • Privacy Program Vertraege AVV Monitoring Reporting
    • Privacy Program Privacy Controls Audit Support
      • Privacy Program Audit Readiness Pruefungsbegleitung
      • Privacy Program Datenschutzanalyse Dokumentation
      • Privacy Program Technische Organisatorische Kontrollen
    • Privacy Program Privacy Framework Setup
      • Privacy Program Datenschutzstrategie Governance
      • Privacy Program DPO Office Rollenverteilung
      • Privacy Program Richtlinien Prozesse
Regulatory Transformation Projektmanagement

Wir steuern Ihre regulatorischen Transformationsprojekte erfolgreich – von der Konzeption bis zur nachhaltigen Implementierung.

▼
    • Change Management Workshops Schulungen
    • Implementierung Neuer Vorgaben CRR KWG MaRisk BAIT IFRS Etc
    • Projekt Programmsteuerung
    • Prozessdigitalisierung Workflow Optimierung
Software Compliance

Weitere Informationen zu Software Compliance.

▼
    • Cloud Compliance Lizenzmanagement Inventarisierung Kommerziell OSS
    • Cloud Compliance Open Source Compliance Entwickler Schulungen
    • Cloud Compliance Prozessintegration Continuous Monitoring
TISAX VDA ISA

Weitere Informationen zu TISAX VDA ISA.

▼
    • TISAX VDA ISA Audit Vorbereitung Labeling
    • TISAX VDA ISA Automotive Supply Chain Compliance
    • TISAX VDA Self Assessment Gap Analyse
VS-NFD

Weitere Informationen zu VS-NFD.

▼
    • VS-NFD Implementation
      • VS-NFD Monitoring Regular Checks
      • VS-NFD Prozessintegration Schulungen
      • VS-NFD Zugangsschutz Kontrollsysteme
    • VS-NFD Ongoing Compliance
      • VS-NFD Audit Trails Protokollierung
      • VS-NFD Kontinuierliche Verbesserung
      • VS-NFD Meldepflichten Behoerdenkommunikation
    • VS-NFD Readiness
      • VS-NFD Dokumentations Sicherheitskonzept
      • VS-NFD Klassifizierung Kennzeichnung Verschlusssachen
      • VS-NFD Rollen Verantwortlichkeiten Definieren
ESG

Weitere Informationen zu ESG.

▼
    • ESG Assessment
    • ESG Audit
    • ESG CSRD
    • ESG Dashboard
    • ESG Datamanagement
    • ESG Due Diligence
    • ESG Governance
    • ESG Implementierung Ongoing ESG Compliance Schulungen Sensibilisierung Audit Readiness Kontinuierliche Verbesserung
    • ESG Kennzahlen
    • ESG KPIs Monitoring KPI Festlegung Benchmarking Datenmanagement Qualitaetssicherung
    • ESG Lieferkettengesetz
    • ESG Nachhaltigkeitsbericht
    • ESG Rating
    • ESG Rating Reporting GRI SASB CDP EU Taxonomie Kommunikation An Stakeholder Investoren
    • ESG Reporting
    • ESG Soziale Aspekte Lieferketten Lieferkettengesetz Menschenrechts Arbeitsstandards Diversity Inclusion
    • ESG Strategie
    • ESG Strategie Governance Leitbildentwicklung Stakeholder Dialog Verankerung In Unternehmenszielen
    • ESG Training
    • ESG Transformation
    • ESG Umweltmanagement Dekarbonisierung Klimaschutzprogramme Energieeffizienz CO2 Bilanzierung Scope 1 3
    • ESG Zertifizierung

Frequently Asked Questions about CRR/CRD SREP Preparation & Documentation

Why is thorough SREP preparation strategically important for financial institutions, and how does ADVISORI support this process?

The Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) is far more than a regulatory formality – it is a strategic milestone with far-reaching implications for an institution's operational freedom, capital planning, and reputation. Professional preparation makes a significant contribution to positioning the institution optimally and avoiding potential supervisory measures that could restrict operational and strategic room for maneuver.

🔍 Strategic dimensions of the SREP process:

• Capital add-ons and operational freedom: The SREP assessment directly influences institution-specific capital add-ons and can therefore have a material impact on your capital planning and business strategy.
• Supervisory dialogue and trust: A professional performance in the SREP process strengthens supervisory confidence in your risk management and governance structures, which has a positive effect on future regulatory interactions.
• Competitive positioning: A positive SREP assessment can serve as a differentiating factor from competitors and lead to better ratings and more favorable refinancing conditions.
• Early identification of weaknesses: The structured preparation process makes it possible to identify your own weaknesses and address them proactively before they are uncovered by the supervisory authority.

📊 Critical success factors for a successful SREP review:

• Comprehensive documentation: Complete, consistent, and traceable documentation of all relevant processes, methods, and governance structures.
• Persuasive presentation: Clear communication of risk management approaches and their appropriateness for the specific business model and risk profile.
• Preparation of key individuals: Professional preparation of all staff involved in the SREP process, particularly for interviews and on-site inspections.
• Proof of implementation effectiveness: Concrete evidence of the effective implementation of all documented processes and controls in day-to-day business.

🛠 ️ The ADVISORI approach for successful SREP preparation:

• Comprehensive gap analysis: We conduct a thorough analysis of your SREP-relevant documentation and processes and systematically identify optimization potential.
• Tailored documentation strategy: We develop a structured approach to creating and optimizing your SREP documentation, tailored to your specific business model and risk profile.
• Practice-tested simulations: We prepare your staff optimally for the SREP process through realistic interview simulations and examination scenarios.
• Strategic positioning: We support you in specifically highlighting your strengths and unique selling points in the SREP process and proactively addressing potential weaknesses.

What typical documentation gaps arise in the SREP context, and how can these be effectively closed?

Documentation gaps represent one of the greatest challenges in the SREP process and can lead to critical assessments by the supervisory authority even where processes and controls are sound. Our experience shows that many institutions, despite functioning risk management practices, have difficulty documenting and demonstrating these adequately. ADVISORI has developed a structured approach to identify typical documentation gaps and close them systematically.

📝 Typical documentation gaps in the SREP context:

• Missing methodology documentation: Inadequate description of the methods and models applied, particularly regarding their assumptions, limitations, and validation results.
• Incomplete process documentation: Incomplete representation of end-to-end processes with unclear responsibilities, control points, and escalation paths.
• Inconsistencies between documents: Contradictory representations in different documents that undermine the credibility of the overall documentation.
• Lack of evidence of implementation: Missing proof that documented processes and controls are actually carried out as described.
• Insufficient rationale for decisions: Missing justifications for methodological decisions, parameter selection, or governance structures.

🔄 Effective strategies for closing documentation gaps:

• Documentation gap analysis: Conducting a structured analysis of existing documentation against supervisory expectations and best practices.
• Establishing documentation standards: Developing uniform templates, structures, and quality standards for all SREP-relevant documents.
• Modular documentation approach: Building a documentation architecture with clear cross-reference structures that minimizes redundancies and promotes consistency.
• Evidence management: Establishing a systematic process for collecting, preparing, and archiving evidence for the implementation of documented processes.
• Quality assurance process: Implementing a multi-stage review process that ensures the completeness, consistency, and persuasiveness of the documentation.

🧩 The ADVISORI approach to documentation optimization:

• Proven documentation templates: We provide practice-tested templates for all SREP-relevant documentation types that meet supervisory expectations and are easily adaptable.
• Process-integrated documentation: We help you integrate documentation processes into existing workflows to minimize additional effort and ensure currency.
• Efficient evidence management: We develop pragmatic approaches to evidence management that keep the documentation effort in reasonable proportion to the regulatory benefit.
• Continuous documentation maintenance: We support you in establishing sustainable processes for the ongoing updating and improvement of your SREP documentation.

How can SREP interviews and on-site inspections be optimally prepared to deliver convincing answers?

SREP interviews and on-site inspections are critical moments in the supervisory dialogue that contribute significantly to the overall assessment. In these direct interactions, an immediate impression is formed of the technical competence, process understanding, and risk awareness of those responsible. Thorough preparation is essential to deliver precise, consistent, and convincing answers even under pressure.

👥 Successful preparation for SREP interviews:

• Role clarification and responsibilities: Clear definition of which individuals must be able to provide information on which subject areas, including fallback solutions.
• Anticipation of critical questions: Systematic identification of potentially critical questions and development of convincing, fact-based answers.
• Consistency coaching: Ensuring consistent communication between different interview participants, particularly on cross-departmental topics.
• Interview simulations: Conducting realistic simulations with challenging questions that reflect the actual examination style.

🔍 Success factors for on-site inspections:

• Structured provision of evidence: Preparation of a clearly structured, complete, and easily accessible collection of all relevant documents and evidence.
• Clear processes for ad hoc requests: Establishing efficient processes for the rapid and precise response to unexpected requests during the inspection.
• Single point of contact: Designating dedicated contact persons for the inspectors who coordinate the flow of information and ensure consistency.
• Daily coordination routines: Setting up an internal debriefing process to evaluate findings from each inspection day and adjust the further course of action.

💡 Communication strategies for convincing answers:

• Precision and clarity: Focusing on clear, precise answers that directly address the question and avoid unnecessary complexity.
• Fact-based argumentation: Supporting all statements with concrete facts, data, and evidence that strengthen your position.
• Transparency regarding weaknesses: Open handling of known weaknesses, combined with concrete measures and timelines for their resolution.
• Consistency with documentation: Ensuring that all verbal statements are consistent with the written documentation and meaningfully complement it.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's support approach for interviews and inspections:

• Tailored interview workshops: We prepare your key individuals optimally for their role in the SREP process through targeted workshops and individual coaching.
• Realistic examination simulations: We conduct demanding simulations that match actual examination situations in depth and intensity.
• Development of Q&A catalogues: We create comprehensive catalogues of expected questions and fact-based answers for all relevant SREP subject areas.
• Inspection support and follow-up: We support you during the inspection in answering complex questions and assist with the structured follow-up and implementation of findings.

What specific documentation requirements apply to the four SREP elements, and how can these be fulfilled efficiently?

The four SREP elements – business model analysis, governance and risk management, capital risks, and liquidity and funding risks – each place specific demands on documentation. An efficient and targeted documentation strategy must take these particularities into account while conveying a coherent overall picture. ADVISORI has developed a modular approach that addresses the element-specific requirements while also leveraging synergies.

📊 Documentation requirements for the business model analysis (Element 1):

• Business model description: Detailed presentation of the business model, value chains, and strategic direction with a clear link to the risk profile.
• Viability analysis: Substantiated analyses of the sustainability and profitability of the business model under various scenarios and market conditions.
• Strategy documentation: Transparent documentation of strategic planning, decision-making processes, and implementation monitoring.
• Competitive positioning: Well-founded analysis of market positioning, competitive advantages and challenges, and measures derived from these.

🏛 ️ Documentation requirements for governance and risk management (Element 2):

• Governance framework: Comprehensive presentation of the organizational structure, responsibilities, and decision-making processes.
• Risk management framework: Detailed description of risk identification, measurement, control, and reporting for all material risk types.
• Three lines of defense: Traceable implementation of the three-lines-of-defense model with clear role delineations and control mechanisms.
• Risk culture: Documentation of measures to promote an appropriate risk culture and its integration into incentive systems and decision-making processes.

💹 Documentation requirements for capital risks (Element 3):

• ICAAP documentation: Complete description of the internal capital adequacy assessment process, including the normative and economic perspectives.
• Risk quantification: Methodology documentation for all material risk types, including model design, validation, and limitations.
• Stress testing: Detailed documentation of the stress testing framework, scenario selection and calibration, and interpretation of results.
• Capital planning: Transparent presentation of capital planning processes, allocation mechanisms, and measures in the event of capital shortfalls.

💧 Documentation requirements for liquidity and funding risks (Element 4):

• ILAAP documentation: Comprehensive description of the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process and its integration into overall risk management.
• Liquidity reserves: Detailed presentation of liquidity reserves, their composition, availability, and resilience under stress conditions.
• Funding structure: Analysis of funding sources, maturities, and concentrations, as well as measures to ensure funding stability.
• Contingency planning: Documentation of the liquidity contingency plan, including early warning indicators, escalation paths, and concrete measures.

🔄 ADVISORI's efficiency approach for SREP documentation:

• Modular documentation architecture: We develop a coherent documentation structure with clear cross-reference relationships that minimizes redundancies and ensures consistency.
• Prioritized documentation strategy: We identify key documents of particular relevance to the SREP assessment and focus optimization efforts accordingly.
• Synergistic documentation creation: We use existing regulatory documentation obligations (e.g., disclosure reports, supervisory reporting) as a basis for SREP documentation.
• Continuous documentation maintenance: We implement efficient processes for the regular updating and quality assurance of SREP documentation within the normal course of business.

How should an effective SREP feedback loop be designed to achieve continuous improvements?

The SREP process should be understood not as a one-off event, but as a continuous improvement cycle. A systematic feedback loop makes it possible to gain valuable insights from each SREP round and translate these into concrete improvement measures. ADVISORI has developed a structured approach that systematizes this continuous learning process and ensures sustainable improvements.

🔄 Core elements of an effective SREP feedback loop:

• Structured follow-up: Systematic analysis of supervisory findings, assessments, and informal feedback after each SREP round.
• Root cause analysis: In-depth investigation of the reasons for critical assessments or findings that goes beyond the immediate symptoms.
• Measure management: Development, prioritization, and implementation tracking of concrete improvement measures with clear responsibilities and timelines.
• Effectiveness review: Regular review of the effectiveness of implemented measures and readjustment where necessary.

📈 Process design for continuous improvement:

• SREP debriefing: Conducting a structured debriefing immediately after the conclusion of the SREP process to capture all findings and observations while they are still fresh.
• Comprehensive assessment: Analysis not only of formal findings, but also of informal indications, follow-up questions, and observations throughout the entire SREP process.
• Prioritization workshop: Joint assessment and prioritization of identified areas for action by criticality, implementation effort, and strategic significance.
• Measure planning: Development of a detailed action plan with concrete measures, responsibilities, resource allocation, and milestones.

🔍 Success factors for an effective feedback loop:

• Management commitment: Active support and involvement of senior management in the follow-up and improvement process.
• Cross-functional collaboration: Involvement of all relevant departments to obtain a complete picture and ensure that measures are implemented comprehensively.
• Transparent communication: Open communication of findings and measures to all stakeholders to raise awareness and promote acceptance.
• Integrated tracking: Embedding SREP measures into regular project management and reporting to ensure continuous attention.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's support approach for SREP follow-up:

• Facilitated debriefing workshops: We conduct structured follow-up workshops covering all aspects of the SREP process and systematically capturing valuable insights.
• Gap analysis and measure development: We support you in identifying areas for action and developing targeted, efficient improvement measures.
• Implementation support: We provide methodological support in the implementation of complex measures and contribute best practices from comparable projects.
• Effectiveness assessment: We help you evaluate the effectiveness of implemented measures and identify ongoing improvement potential.

What role does the documentation of governance processes play in the SREP, and how can it be optimized?

The documentation of governance processes plays a central role in the SREP process, as supervisory authorities pay particular attention to the internal governance of an institution. A clear, consistent, and convincing presentation of governance structures and processes is essential for a positive SREP assessment and demonstrates the institution's ability to effectively manage and control its risks. ADVISORI supports institutions in optimizing their governance documentation through a structured, practice-oriented approach.

🏛 ️ Critical governance aspects in the SREP focus:

• Organizational structure and responsibilities: Clear presentation of the organizational structure, decision-making bodies, reporting lines, and responsibilities at all levels.
• Risk strategy and appetite: Documentation of the process for defining, communicating, and monitoring the risk strategy and risk appetite.
• Three lines of defense: Traceable implementation of the three-lines-of-defense model with clear role delineations and control mechanisms.
• Internal control functions: Detailed description of the tasks, powers, resources, and independence of the control functions (risk management, compliance, internal audit).

📊 Success factors for convincing governance documentation:

• Consistent end-to-end presentation: Smooth documentation of governance processes from the strategic level through to operational implementation.
• Traceable decision-making processes: Transparent presentation of how strategic decisions are made, communicated, and implemented.
• Concrete evidence of effectiveness: Evidence of the effective functioning of governance structures based on concrete examples and key metrics.
• Clear link to the business model: Presentation of how governance structures are tailored to the institution's specific business model and risk profile.

🔄 Optimization approaches for governance documentation:

• Governance framework documentation: Development of a comprehensive governance framework that maps all relevant aspects in a structured and consistent manner.
• Process map: Creation of a visual representation of all governance processes and their interdependencies for a convincing overall overview.
• Role matrix: Detailed documentation of the roles, responsibilities, and decision-making powers of all relevant functions and bodies.
• Effectiveness evidence: Systematic collection and preparation of evidence for the effectiveness of governance structures, e.g., through meeting minutes, escalation examples, or key metric tracking.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's approach to optimizing governance documentation:

• Governance gap analysis: We conduct a detailed analysis of your existing governance documentation and systematically identify optimization potential.
• Best-practice templates: We provide proven templates for all relevant governance documents that meet supervisory expectations and are easily adaptable.
• Governance mapping: We support you in creating a consistent, integrated representation of your governance structures and processes.
• Case-based evidence management: We help you identify and prepare convincing effectiveness evidence that demonstrates the practical implementation of your governance processes.

How can institutions optimize the documentation of their ICAAP and ILAAP for the SREP process?

ICAAP (Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process) and ILAAP (Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process) are central elements of the SREP and place high demands on documentation. Convincing ICAAP/ILAAP documentation demonstrates not only regulatory compliance, but also the institution's ability to effectively manage its capital and liquidity risks. ADVISORI supports institutions in optimizing their ICAAP/ILAAP documentation through a structured approach aligned with supervisory expectations.

📚 Core elements of convincing ICAAP/ILAAP documentation:

• Governance and integration: Clear presentation of the embedding of ICAAP/ILAAP in overall bank management and decision-making processes.
• Risk identification and assessment: Traceable documentation of the process for identifying, assessing, and aggregating all material risks.
• Methods and models: Detailed description of the methods and models applied, including their assumptions, limitations, and validation results.
• Stress tests and scenario analyses: Comprehensive documentation of the stress testing framework, scenario selection and calibration, and interpretation of results.

🔍 ECB-compliant structure for ICAAP/ILAAP documentation:

• Reader's manual: Introductory overview of the ICAAP/ILAAP architecture that facilitates navigation and understanding of the documentation.
• Normative perspective: Comprehensive presentation of multi-year capital and liquidity planning under baseline and stress scenarios.
• Economic perspective: Detailed description of internal risk quantification and economic capital or liquidity requirements.
• Data, IT, and infrastructure: Documentation of the data sources, systems, and processes supporting ICAAP/ILAAP, including data quality controls.
• Embedding in strategy processes: Presentation of how ICAAP/ILAAP results feed into strategic decisions, limit setting, and business planning.

📈 Optimization approaches for ICAAP/ILAAP documentation:

• Integrated documentation architecture: Development of a coherent documentation structure with clear cross-reference relationships that ensures consistency and minimizes redundancies.
• Narrative-supported presentation: Supplementing technical details with convincing narratives that explain the appropriateness of methods and processes for the specific business model.
• Visualization of complex relationships: Use of diagrams, process maps, and dashboards to present complex methodologies and interdependencies in an understandable way.
• Effectiveness evidence: Systematic integration of evidence for the actual application and influence of ICAAP/ILAAP on business decisions.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's approach to optimizing ICAAP/ILAAP documentation:

• Gap analysis against supervisory expectations: We conduct a detailed analysis of your existing ICAAP/ILAAP documentation against current ECB guidelines and best practices.
• Documentation roadmap: We develop a structured roadmap for the step-by-step optimization of your ICAAP/ILAAP documentation with clear priorities and milestones.
• Methodology validation: We support you in the critical review and improvement of your methods and their documentation to meet supervisory requirements.
• Integration of lessons learned: We contribute insights from numerous SREP processes to proactively address typical weaknesses in ICAAP/ILAAP documentation.

How can the business model analysis (BMA) be convincingly documented for the SREP process?

The business model analysis (BMA) forms, as Element

1 of the SREP, the basis for the supervisory assessment and has a significant influence on the overall evaluation of an institution. Convincing documentation of the business model and its sustainability not only ensures regulatory compliance, but can also create strategic advantages in the supervisory dialogue. ADVISORI supports institutions in optimizing their BMA documentation through a structured, strategically oriented approach.

🔍 Core aspects of convincing BMA documentation:

• Business model description: Clear, precise presentation of the business model, value chains, and unique selling points with reference to the market environment.
• Strategy and implementation: Transparent documentation of strategic objectives, planning assumptions, and implementation measures with traceable milestones.
• Profitability and sustainability: Substantiated analysis of the current and projected earnings position, profitability drivers and risks under various scenarios.
• Competitive positioning: Convincing presentation of market position, competitive advantages and challenges with clear action strategies.

📊 Supervisory focus topics in the BMA assessment:

• Viability of the business model: Evidence of the ability to generate acceptable returns over the next

12 months, taking into account the risk profile and strategy implementation.

• Sustainability of the strategy: Evidence of long-term viability (at least

3 years) based on strategic plans, financial projections, and the competitive environment.

• Identification of key risks: Systematic analysis of the material vulnerabilities of the business model to internal and external factors.
• Digital transformation: Presentation of the digitalization strategy and its impact on the business model, processes, and customer relationships.

💡 Success factors for convincing BMA documentation:

• Strategic narrative: Development of a coherent, fact-based narrative that convincingly conveys the strengths of the business model and its future viability.
• Quantitative substantiation: Supporting qualitative statements with meaningful key metrics, benchmarks, and trend analyses that demonstrate the viability of the business model.
• Transparency regarding challenges: Open handling of identified weaknesses and clear presentation of planned countermeasures and their expected impact.
• Consistency with other SREP elements: Ensuring coherence between BMA documentation and other SREP-relevant documents, particularly regarding governance, risk management, and capital planning.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's approach to optimizing BMA documentation:

• Strategic positioning analysis: We support you in developing a convincing presentation of your business model and its unique selling points in the market context.
• Business model stress tests: We help you analyze and convincingly document the resilience of your business model under various stress scenarios.
• Profitability driver analysis: We support you in the detailed analysis and documentation of your earnings drivers, risks, and optimization potential.
• Strategic roadmap: We help you convincingly present your strategic initiatives and transformation projects and link them to your business model.

How can stress tests be convincingly documented for the SREP process?

Stress tests are a central element of the SREP process and play a decisive role in the supervisory assessment of an institution's capital and liquidity adequacy. Convincing documentation of the stress testing framework, scenarios, and results demonstrates not only regulatory compliance, but also the institution's ability to understand and manage risks under adverse conditions. ADVISORI supports institutions in optimizing their stress test documentation through a structured approach aligned with supervisory expectations.

🔄 Core elements of convincing stress test documentation:

• Stress test framework: Comprehensive presentation of the stress testing framework, including governance, processes, methods, and responsibilities.
• Scenario development: Traceable documentation of the process for developing, calibrating, and validating stress scenarios.
• Methodology and models: Detailed description of the methods and models applied to translate scenarios into financial impacts.
• Integration into overall bank management: Clear presentation of how stress results feed into strategic decisions, capital planning, and risk appetite.

📊 Supervisory expectations for stress tests in the SREP context:

• Comprehensive risk coverage: Evidence that all material risks and their interdependencies are taken into account in the stress test.
• Appropriate scenario severity: Documentation of the severity of scenarios and their appropriateness relative to the institution's business model and risk profile.
• Consistency across risk types: Presentation of methodological consistency across different risk types and the aggregated view.
• Reverse stress tests: Convincing approach to reverse stress tests that identify vulnerabilities in the business model under extreme conditions.

💡 Success factors for convincing stress test documentation:

• Narrative linkage: Development of a traceable narrative that links the scenarios to the macroeconomic environment and the institution's business model.
• Transparency regarding assumptions: Clear documentation of all underlying assumptions, simplifications, and limitations with convincing justification.
• Application reference: Concrete examples of how stress results have fed into business decisions, e.g., in capital planning or risk strategy.
• Visual presentation: Effective visualization of complex relationships and results through meaningful charts, dashboards, and heatmaps.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's approach to optimizing stress test documentation:

• Gap analysis against EBA guidelines: We conduct a detailed analysis of your existing stress test documentation against current supervisory expectations and best practices.
• Methodology optimization: We support you in the further development and convincing documentation of your stress test methods and models.
• Scenario development: We help you develop plausible, severe, yet defensible stress scenarios tailored to your specific business model.
• Management information: We optimize the preparation and presentation of stress results for various stakeholders, from the management board to the supervisory authority.

How can one optimally prepare for critical SREP questions on model assumptions and limitations?

In the SREP process, questions about model assumptions and limitations are among the most critical examination areas, as they form the basis for risk quantification and thus for capital and liquidity adequacy. A convincing demonstration of model understanding and a reflective approach to model uncertainty are decisive for the supervisory assessment. ADVISORI supports institutions in targeted preparation for these critical examination aspects through a structured approach focused on transparency and methodological competence.

📏 Critical model aspects in the SREP focus:

• Fundamental model assumptions: In-depth understanding and transparent documentation of the fundamental assumptions in all relevant risk models.
• Parameter calibration: Traceable justification of the chosen parameter values and their empirical or theoretical basis.
• Model limitations: Honest identification and analysis of the inherent boundaries and weaknesses of the models used.
• Model uncertainty: Systematic handling of model uncertainty and its consideration in risk buffers and decision-making processes.

🔍 Typical critical SREP questions on models and how to answer them:

• Question on data basis: "How do you ensure that your models are based on sufficient and representative data, particularly for rare events?" → Convincing answer: Concrete presentation of data sources, data enrichment strategies (e.g., external data, expert estimates), and systematic data quality controls. Transparent discussion of data limitations and compensating measures.
• Question on model assumptions: "What critical assumptions underlie your credit risk model, and how do you validate their appropriateness?" → Convincing answer: Structured listing of core assumptions with a clear justification for their selection. Presentation of the regular validation process with concrete examples of how assumptions are reviewed and adjusted where necessary.
• Question on model risks: "How do you account for model risks in your capital planning and risk control?" → Convincing answer: Explanation of the structured model risk framework, quantification approaches for model risks, and their concrete consideration in capital add-ons. Examples of management decisions that have explicitly taken model risks into account.
• Question on model failure: "What would happen if your market price risk model fails in a stress situation?" → Convincing answer: Presentation of fallback solutions and contingency plans in the event of model failure. Results of model stress tests and reverse stress tests that identify weaknesses and corresponding mitigation measures.

🧠 Success factors for convincing answers to model questions:

• Deep technical understanding: Ensuring that interview participants not only have a superficial knowledge of the models, but a deep understanding of their mathematical and conceptual foundations.
• Critical self-reflection: Demonstrating a critically reflective attitude towards one's own models that openly addresses weaknesses and is aware of improvement potential.
• Concrete examples: Supporting abstract explanations with concrete practical examples that illustrate actual application and limitations.
• Consistent communication: Ensuring that all interview participants communicate a consistent understanding of the models and their limitations.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's preparation approach for model discussions in the SREP:

• Model inventory: We support you in the systematic recording and documentation of all SREP-relevant models, their assumptions, and limitations.
• Critical model analysis: We conduct an independent assessment of your critical models and identify potential weaknesses that could be questioned in the SREP.
• Interview simulations: We prepare your subject matter experts for critical model questions through demanding simulations and develop convincing response strategies.
• Model risk framework: We support you in the development and documentation of a sound framework for handling model risks that meets supervisory expectations.

How should the documentation of data quality and data governance be optimized for the SREP?

Data quality and data governance have gained enormous importance in the SREP process in recent years. Supervisory authorities increasingly recognize that reliable data forms the basis for effective risk management and well-founded decisions. Convincing documentation of the data architecture, data quality controls, and data governance processes is therefore essential for a positive SREP assessment. ADVISORI supports institutions in optimizing their data documentation through a structured approach aligned with supervisory expectations.

💾 Core elements of convincing data documentation for the SREP:

• Data architecture and flows: Transparent presentation of the data landscape, data flows, and data transformations from source to reporting.
• Data quality framework: Comprehensive documentation of the approach to ensuring and monitoring data quality across all dimensions (completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness, etc.).
• Data governance: Clear description of the roles, responsibilities, and processes in data management, including data ownership and data quality accountability.
• Data validation: Traceable documentation of the controls and validation processes that ensure the integrity and quality of data.

📊 Supervisory expectations for data documentation:

• End-to-end data transparency: Traceability of data from source to use in reports and decision-making processes.
• Data quality metrics: Establishment and monitoring of objective key metrics for measuring and improving data quality over time.
• Data quality culture: Evidence of an organization-wide culture that recognizes and promotes the value of high-quality data.
• Data deficiency remediation: Systematic process for identifying, prioritizing, and resolving data deficiencies with clear responsibilities and timelines.

🔄 Optimization approaches for data documentation:

• Data lineage mapping: Development of visual representations of data flows and transformations for critical data points and reports.
• Data quality dashboards: Implementation and documentation of dashboards for the continuous monitoring and improvement of data quality.
• Data dictionary: Creation of a comprehensive data dictionary with clear definitions, sources, responsibilities, and quality standards for all critical data points.
• Issue management process: Documentation of the structured process for recording, prioritizing, and resolving data quality issues.

💡 Success factors for convincing data documentation:

• Concrete examples: Supporting descriptions with concrete examples that illustrate the practical implementation of data governance and quality assurance.
• Continuous improvement: Evidence of an established process for the continuous improvement of data quality with measurable results over time.
• Technology integration: Presentation of how technologies and tools are used to systematically measure, monitor, and improve data quality.
• Management commitment: Demonstration of senior management's commitment to data quality through formal policies, resource allocation, and regular reporting.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's approach to optimizing data documentation:

• Data gap analysis: We conduct a detailed analysis of your existing data documentation against supervisory expectations and best practices.
• Data lineage mapping: We support you in developing transparent end-to-end representations of your critical data flows for the SREP.
• Data quality framework: We help you document a comprehensive framework for data quality that covers all relevant dimensions and controls.
• Data governance optimization: We support you in the further development and convincing documentation of your data governance structures and processes.

How can an effective documentation strategy for the SREP process be developed?

An effective SREP documentation strategy is more than just a collection of individual documents – it is a systematic approach that coordinates and optimizes the creation, maintenance, and use of all relevant documentation. A well-conceived strategy ensures that documentation is not only complete and current, but also convincing, consistent, and appropriately tailored to the target audience. ADVISORI supports institutions in developing tailored documentation strategies that meet supervisory expectations while minimizing internal effort.

📝 Core elements of an effective SREP documentation strategy:

• Documentation architecture: Development of a coherent structure that systematically organizes all SREP-relevant documents and represents their relationships to one another.
• Documentation priorities: Clear prioritization of documentation efforts based on supervisory relevance, risk profile, and identified gaps.
• Editorial processes: Establishing efficient processes for the creation, review, approval, and updating of documentation.
• Quality assurance: Implementation of systematic controls to ensure content quality, consistency, and conformity with supervisory expectations.

🔄 Central elements for an optimal documentation structure:

• Reader's guide: Development of an overarching navigation concept that helps inspectors understand the documentation structure and quickly find relevant content.
• Hierarchical concept: Organization of documentation at various levels of detail – from overview documents to detailed technical specifications.
• Modular structure: Structuring documentation into thematic modules that can be updated independently but are connected through clear cross-references.
• Consistent formatting: Use of uniform templates, style elements, and terminology across all documents to enhance professionalism and readability.

🎯 Target audience-oriented preparation of documentation:

• Management board level: Focus on strategic context, business relevance, and material risks in concise, non-technical language.
• Technical level: Detailed technical content with clear methodological explanations and traceable justifications for decisions made.
• Operational level: Concrete instructions, process descriptions, and technical details for day-to-day implementation.
• Supervisory perspective: Consideration of specific supervisory questions and explicit reference to regulatory requirements and guidelines.

⚙ ️ Implementation approach for an SREP documentation strategy:

• Gap analysis and stocktaking: Systematic recording and assessment of existing documentation against supervisory requirements and best practices.
• Documentation roadmap: Development of a prioritized plan for the step-by-step optimization of documentation with clear milestones and responsibilities.
• Templates and guidelines: Creation of standardized templates and editorial guidelines that promote consistency, quality, and efficiency in documentation creation.
• Collaboration platform: Implementation of a central platform for the collaborative creation, management, and use of documentation.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's support approach for your documentation strategy:

• Strategic documentation consulting: We develop with you a tailored documentation strategy aligned to your specific business model, risk profile, and organizational framework.
• Documentation blueprint: We create a comprehensive blueprint for your SREP documentation that defines all relevant documents, their relationships, and responsibilities.
• Editorial support: We provide professional support in the creation and optimization of critical SREP documents that meet high qualitative and supervisory standards.
• Knowledge transfer: We enable your staff to independently create and maintain high-quality SREP documentation through targeted training and coaching.

What practical experience from past SREP reviews should inform the preparation?

Practical experience from past SREP reviews offers valuable insights that enable targeted and effective preparation. The systematic evaluation and use of this experience can represent a decisive competitive advantage in the supervisory dialogue. ADVISORI brings extensive experience from numerous SREP reviews and supports institutions in deriving practical benefit from these insights.

🔍 Key learnings from past SREP reviews:

• Documentation quality as a key factor: The quality, completeness, and traceability of documentation has proven to be one of the most important success factors for positive SREP assessments.
• Consistency across different documents: Inconsistencies between different documents are quickly identified by inspectors and regularly lead to critical follow-up questions and negative assessments.
• Evidence of practical application: The mere existence of policies and processes is not sufficient – the supervisory authority expects concrete evidence of their actual application in day-to-day business.
• Depth of methodological understanding: Inspectors specifically test the understanding of complex methods and models among various staff members to assess the anchoring of knowledge within the organization.

📋 Typical focus areas in current SREP reviews:

• Risk data aggregation and reporting: Increased scrutiny of data quality, data aggregation, and internal risk reporting in accordance with BCBS 239 principles.
• IT risk management and cybersecurity: Growing focus on the governance and control of IT risks, particularly in the context of digital transformation.
• ESG risks: Growing importance of integrating sustainability risks into risk management, strategy, and governance structures.
• New working models: Review of risk management and control processes in the context of remote work and hybrid working models.

🚫 Common criticisms in SREP reviews and how to address them:

• Inadequate end-to-end process documentation: → Solution: Development of integrated process maps that depict all relevant processes from data collection to decision-making and clearly link them to one another.
• Lack of traceability of methodological decisions: → Solution: Documentation of decision-making processes for methodological approaches with a clear presentation of the alternatives evaluated, decision criteria, and justifications.
• Missing effectiveness evidence for controls: → Solution: Systematic collection and preparation of evidence for the effective functioning of controls, e.g., through control logs, escalation examples, and audit reports.
• Inconsistent communication during the review process: → Solution: Preparation of a communication concept with central coordination, uniform messaging, and regular internal coordination during the review.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's approach to leveraging practical SREP experience:

• Benchmarking and best practices: We contribute extensive experience from numerous SREP reviews and identify relevant best practices and benchmarks for your specific situation.
• Supervisory trend analysis: We keep you informed about current developments and focus topics in SREP reviews so that you can prepare specifically for these.
• Mock reviews: We conduct realistic simulations that reflect current supervisory examination approaches and optimally prepare your organization for the actual review.
• Experience-based checklists: We provide practice-tested checklists based on concrete experience from numerous SREP reviews that help avoid typical pitfalls.

What typical pitfalls exist in SREP preparation, and how can these be avoided?

Despite careful planning, there are numerous typical pitfalls in SREP preparation that can lead to suboptimal results. Early awareness of these pitfalls and preventive measures to avoid them are essential for a successful SREP review. ADVISORI has developed a systematic approach from extensive practical experience to identify and circumvent these typical stumbling blocks.

⚠ ️ Typical pitfalls in preparation and how to avoid them:

• Starting preparation too late: Many institutions only begin SREP preparation once the concrete review announcement has been received, which leads to considerable time pressure. → Solution: Establishing a continuous SREP preparation process that runs independently of specific review dates and ensures the ongoing updating of relevant documentation.
• Fragmented responsibilities: Unclear or fragmented accountabilities for various SREP aspects lead to inconsistencies and gaps in preparation. → Solution: Setting up a central SREP coordination function with clear responsibilities and defined processes for cross-functional collaboration.
• Overfocus on formalities: Excessive concentration on formal aspects while neglecting content quality and practical applicability. → Solution: A balanced approach that ensures both formal completeness and content depth and practical relevance, supported by internal peer reviews.
• Inadequate preparation of interview participants: Insufficient training and preparation of staff involved in SREP interviews. → Solution: Targeted interview training with realistic simulations, preparation for critical questions, and ensuring a consistent understanding of all relevant topics.

🧩 Coordination challenges and how to address them:

• Overcoming silo thinking: Isolated preparation in individual departments without sufficient coordination leads to inconsistencies and redundancies. → Solution: Establishing cross-functional working groups and regular coordination meetings that promote an integrated perspective.
• Knowledge gaps between specialist departments and the documentation team: Subject matter experts often possess implicit knowledge that is not adequately documented. → Solution: Structured knowledge transfer workshops and close dialogue between subject matter experts and documentation specialists.
• Resource conflicts: Competition between SREP preparation and day-to-day business often leads to resource bottlenecks and quality shortfalls. → Solution: Early resource planning, clear prioritization, and where necessary, temporary relief of key individuals from day-to-day business.
• Inadequate expectation management: Lack of clarity about supervisory expectations leads to misdirected focus and inefficient use of resources. → Solution: Systematic analysis of supervisory guidelines, involvement of external expertise, and proactive dialogue with the supervisory authority on critical topics.

📈 Success factors for efficient SREP preparation:

• Realistic scheduling: Allowing for sufficient buffer time for unforeseen challenges and iterative revisions.
• Risk-based prioritization: Focusing preparation resources on areas with high supervisory focus or known weaknesses.
• Continuous improvement: Establishing a feedback loop that systematically incorporates experience from earlier reviews into current preparation.
• Executive sponsorship: Active support and regular engagement of senior management to ensure the necessary attention and resource allocation.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's approach to avoiding typical pitfalls:

• Risk-oriented gap analysis: We systematically identify potential weaknesses in your SREP preparation and prioritize areas for action by supervisory relevance.
• Proven project structures: We support you in establishing efficient project structures and processes that ensure coordinated and high-quality preparation.
• Critical review processes: We conduct independent reviews of your SREP documentation to identify inconsistencies, gaps, and potential points of criticism at an early stage.
• Experience-based checklists: We provide you with practice-tested checklists that address typical pitfalls and enable structured quality assurance.

How should risk processes and controls be optimally documented for the SREP?

Convincing documentation of risk processes and controls is a central element for a successful SREP review. It demonstrates not only formal compliance with regulatory requirements, but also the actual effectiveness of risk management in day-to-day business. ADVISORI supports institutions in developing documentation that both meets supervisory expectations and convincingly presents the specific strengths of the institution's own risk management.

🔄 Core elements of convincing process and control documentation:

• End-to-end process representation: Complete mapping of risk processes from identification through assessment and control to reporting and monitoring.
• Clear responsibilities: Unambiguous assignment of roles and responsibilities along the entire process, including escalation paths and decision-making powers.
• Controls and their effectiveness: Detailed description of all key controls, their functioning, frequency, and responsibilities, as well as evidence of their effectiveness.
• Process interfaces: Transparent presentation of the interfaces between different processes, departments, and systems to convey a comprehensive picture.

📊 Structured approaches for process and control documentation:

• Process maps: Development of visual representations of the risk process landscape that provide a quick overview of all relevant processes and their relationships.
• RACI matrices: Clear documentation of responsibilities according to the RACI principle (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) for all key processes and controls.
• Control matrices: Systematic recording of all controls with their characteristics (preventive/detective, manual/automated, frequency, etc.) and assignment to the risks addressed.
• Evidence collections: Structured collection of evidence for the actual execution and effectiveness of controls, e.g., through logs, screenshots, or audit reports.

💡 Success factors for convincing process and control documentation:

• Process-oriented presentation: Focus on the actual flow and logic of processes rather than on isolated organizational or technical aspects.
• Pragmatic level of detail: Balanced ratio between necessary detail and clarity that allows inspectors efficient access.
• Concrete examples: Supporting process descriptions with concrete practical examples that illustrate actual application.
• Consistent terminology: Use of uniform terminology across all documents, ideally supported by a glossary.

🔍 Specific documentation requirements for different risk types:

• Credit risk processes: Detailed documentation of the credit origination and monitoring process, including rating/scoring, limit setting, collateral valuation, and problem loan management.
• Market risk processes: Traceable presentation of the identification, measurement, limitation, and monitoring of market risks, including the validation of models and stress testing procedures.
• Operational risk processes: Comprehensive documentation of the risk self-assessment, loss data collection, scenario analysis, and risk mitigation measures.
• Liquidity risk processes: Transparent description of liquidity planning, measurement, and management, including contingency plans and early warning indicators.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's support approach for process and control documentation:

• Process mapping workshops: We conduct structured workshops to systematically capture your risk processes and present them in convincing process maps.
• Control inventory and optimization: We support you in the systematic recording, assessment, and optimization of your controls and their documentation.
• Evidence management: We help you establish an efficient system for collecting, preparing, and archiving effectiveness evidence.
• Documentation templates: We provide proven templates for all relevant process and control documents that meet supervisory expectations and are easily adaptable.

How should IT systems and infrastructure be documented for the SREP?

IT systems and infrastructure play an increasingly central role in the SREP process, as they form the technical foundation for risk management, data processing, and reporting. Convincing documentation of the IT landscape demonstrates not only technical compliance, but also the soundness, security, and future viability of the systems. ADVISORI supports institutions in developing IT documentation that both meets supervisory expectations and convincingly presents the specific strengths of the IT architecture.

💻 Core elements of convincing IT system documentation for the SREP:

• IT architecture overview: Comprehensive presentation of the IT landscape with all relevant systems, data flows, and interfaces in an understandable visual form.
• System specifications: Detailed description of risk-relevant systems, their functionalities, technical characteristics, and governance structures.
• Data flow and processing: Transparent documentation of data flows from source to reporting, including all transformations, aggregations, and validation steps.
• IT risks and controls: Comprehensive presentation of IT-specific risks and the controls implemented to mitigate them.

🔐 Specific documentation requirements for IT governance and security:

• IT governance framework: Description of the structures, processes, and responsibilities for the management and control of IT, including strategy development and resource allocation.
• Change management: Documentation of the process for planning, approving, testing, and implementing changes to systems and applications.
• IT security concept: Presentation of the technical and organizational measures to protect IT systems and data from unauthorized access, manipulation, and loss.
• Business continuity and disaster recovery: Description of the measures to ensure the availability of critical systems in the event of disruptions or disasters.

📊 Documentation of data quality assurance and validation:

• Data quality framework: Comprehensive description of the approach to ensuring and monitoring data quality across all relevant dimensions.
• Data validation controls: Detailed documentation of the controls implemented to validate data at various points in the processing workflow.
• Data quality monitoring: Presentation of the processes and tools for the continuous monitoring and improvement of data quality.
• Handling of data errors: Description of the processes for identifying, escalating, and resolving data quality issues.

🔄 Documentation of IT outsourcing and third-party providers:

• Outsourcing strategy: Presentation of the strategic considerations and decision-making processes for IT outsourcing and third-party provider use.
• Risk assessment and due diligence: Documentation of the risk assessment of potential service providers and the due diligence process prior to contract conclusion.
• Contract management: Description of the processes for monitoring contract performance, including service level agreements and key performance indicators.
• Contingency planning: Presentation of the measures to ensure business continuity in the event of failure or termination of outsourcing services.

💡 Success factors for convincing IT documentation:

• Target audience-appropriate preparation: Adapting documentation to the needs of various stakeholders, from technical experts to supervisory inspectors without IT specialization.
• Visual representations: Use of meaningful diagrams, architecture sketches, and heatmaps to make complex IT structures and relationships understandable.
• Consistency with other SREP documents: Ensuring terminological and content consistency between IT documentation and other SREP-relevant documents.
• Evidence of functionality: Integration of concrete evidence for the actual functioning and effectiveness of IT systems and controls.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's support approach for IT documentation:

• IT architecture mapping: We support you in developing clear and meaningful representations of your IT landscape for the SREP context.
• IT risk and control assessment: We help you systematically record, assess, and convincingly document your IT-specific risks and controls.
• Data flow analysis: We conduct detailed analyses of your data flows and create transparent end-to-end representations for critical data points and reports.
• IT governance optimization: We support you in the further development and convincing documentation of your IT governance structures and processes in the SREP context.

How can senior management be optimally involved in the SREP preparation process?

The active involvement of senior management in the SREP preparation process is a critical success factor that is often underestimated. A convincing presentation of governance and risk management requires that senior management is not only formally involved, but also demonstrates a deep understanding and authentic commitment. ADVISORI supports institutions in optimally involving senior management in the SREP process, thereby strengthening both the quality of preparation and the persuasiveness of the supervisory dialogue.

🔍 Dimensions of senior management involvement in the SREP context:

• Strategic management: Active role of senior management in defining strategic priorities and resource allocation for SREP preparation.
• Technical competence: Ensuring a well-founded understanding among senior management members of their respective areas of responsibility in the SREP context.
• Culture setting: Senior management's role as a model in establishing a risk culture and compliance orientation that is positively assessed in the SREP.
• Supervisory dialogue: Direct interaction of senior management with the supervisory authorities in critical phases of the SREP process.

📋 Success factors for optimal involvement of senior management:

• Early and continuous involvement: Regular status reports and decision papers to senior management, not only shortly before the review.
• Targeted information: Preparation of relevant SREP topics in a form appropriate for senior management that clearly highlights strategic implications and options for action.
• Active role definition: Clear definition of the specific roles and responsibilities of each senior management member in the SREP process, aligned with individual competencies and areas of responsibility.
• Targeted preparation: Individual coaching and briefing of senior management members for their specific roles in interviews and presentations.

🗣 ️ Optimal preparation of senior management for SREP interviews:

• Thematic in-depth analysis: Identification of potential focus topics for each senior management member based on supervisory trends and institution-specific risks.
• Mock interviews: Conducting realistic interview simulations with challenging questions that reflect the actual examination style, with detailed feedback.
• Consistency training: Ensuring consistent communication between different senior management members and with other interview participants on overarching topics.
• Narrative development: Support in developing convincing narratives on strategic topics such as business model, risk strategy, and future prospects.

📝 Documentation of senior management involvement for the SREP:

• Governance documentation: Traceable documentation of the formal governance structures, decision-making processes, and oversight mechanisms of senior management.
• Meeting minutes: Careful documentation of the treatment of risk- and compliance-relevant topics in senior management meetings as evidence of active management.
• Decision-making processes: Transparent presentation of how strategic decisions are made taking risk and compliance aspects into account.
• Tone from the top: Documentation of concrete activities and communications by senior management to promote an appropriate risk culture.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's support approach for senior management involvement:

• Executive briefings: We conduct focused briefing sessions for senior management that address current supervisory expectations and institution-specific challenges.
• Individual coaching: We offer tailored coaching for individual senior management members in preparation for their specific role in the SREP process.
• Strategic alignment workshops: We facilitate workshops to align the strategic positioning between different senior management members and with the extended leadership team.
• Communication strategy: We support the development of a consistent communication strategy for the supervisory dialogue that convincingly conveys senior management's strategic vision and risk understanding.

How should effective project management for SREP preparation be structured?

Effective project management is essential for successful SREP preparation, as it must coordinate numerous stakeholders, ensure the timely completion of extensive documentation, and guarantee consistently high quality throughout. ADVISORI supports institutions in developing and implementing a tailored project management approach that addresses the specific challenges of SREP preparation and ensures efficient use of resources.

📋 Core elements of effective SREP project management:

• Governance structure: Establishing a clear project governance with defined roles, responsibilities, and escalation paths that enables effective decision-making.
• Workstream organization: Structuring the project into thematic workstreams corresponding to the SREP elements or institution-specific requirements, with clear responsibilities and deliverables.
• Scheduling: Development of a realistic timeline with sufficient buffers that takes into account all critical milestones and dependencies.
• Resource allocation: Ensuring the availability of sufficient resources with the required competencies for all project phases.

🔄 Phase model for SREP preparation:

• Initialization phase (3–

4 months before SREP start):

• Gap analysis to identify documentation and process gaps
• Development of the project structure and project plan
• Definition of roles and responsibilities
• Kick-off with all relevant stakeholders
• Documentation creation phase (2–

3 months before SREP start):

• Coordinated creation and updating of all relevant documents
• Regular quality assurance and consistency checks
• Coordination between workstreams to ensure a consistent presentation
• Preparation of evidence for practical implementation
• Preparation phase (

1 month before SREP start):

• Finalization and quality assurance of all documents
• Preparation of interview participants through targeted training and briefings
• Conducting mock interviews and examination simulations
• Establishing processes for the review phase
• Execution phase (during the SREP): - Central coordination of all requests and responses - Daily coordination and debriefings - Quality assurance of all responses prior to submission - Continuous adjustment of strategy based on the progress of the review
• Follow-up phase (after the SREP): - Systematic evaluation of review results and experiences - Derivation of improvement measures for processes and documentation - Planning the implementation of identified measures - Updating of continuous SREP preparation processes

📊 Success factors for project management:

• Clear decision-making structures: Establishing unambiguous decision-making paths with defined escalation levels for efficient problem resolution.
• Integrated quality management: Implementation of a consistent quality assurance process that ensures completeness, consistency, and persuasiveness.
• Transparent reporting: Regular status reports to all relevant stakeholders that clearly communicate progress, risks, and required actions.
• Flexible resource management: Ability to respond to changed requirements or unexpected challenges through flexible resource allocation.

🛠 ️ Project management tools and techniques for SREP preparation:

• Central document platform: Use of a secure, collaborative platform for the central management of all SREP-relevant documents with version control and access management.
• Progress tracking: Use of a structured tracking system that makes the status of all deliverables transparent and provides early warning of delays.
• Risk and issue management: Systematic identification, assessment, and addressing of project risks and issues with clear responsibilities and measures.
• Dependency management: Transparent presentation and active management of all critical dependencies between different workstreams and deliverables.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's support approach for SREP project management:

• Project structure consulting: We support you in developing a tailored project structure aligned to your specific organizational framework and challenges.
• Methodological toolkit: We provide proven project management tools, templates, and checklists specifically optimized for SREP preparation.
• Project controlling: We support you in establishing effective progress tracking and risk management that provides early warning of potential issues.
• Escalation management: We offer support in identifying and resolving critical project issues through structured escalation processes and experience-based solutions.

What new supervisory focus areas can be observed in current SREP reviews?

The supervisory focus areas in the SREP process are continuously evolving, influenced by regulatory changes, new risks in the banking sector, and shifting supervisory priorities. A deep understanding of current focus topics enables targeted preparation for the specific challenges to be expected in upcoming reviews. ADVISORI continuously analyzes the development of supervisory focus areas and supports institutions in proactively addressing these topics in their SREP preparation.

🔍 Current supervisory focus topics in the SREP:

• ESG risks and sustainability management: Increased focus on the integration of environmental, social, and governance risks into risk management, strategy, and governance structures.
• Digital transformation and IT risks: Growing examination intensity regarding the governance and control of IT risks, particularly in the context of digital transformation and cybersecurity.
• New working models: Increased attention to risk management and control processes in the context of remote work and hybrid working models.
• Business model transformation: More intensive analysis of the strategic adaptability of institutions in the face of structural challenges such as the low interest rate environment, digitalization, and changing customer behavior.

📊 Specific developments in the four SREP elements:

• Element

1 – Business model analysis:

• Sustainability transformation: Increased focus on the adaptation of the business model to climate risks and ESG requirements.
• Digital competitiveness: More intensive review of the digital strategy and its impact on long-term competitiveness.
• Strategic agility: Growing assessment of the ability to flexibly adapt the business model to changing market conditions.
• Element

2 – Governance and risk management:

• Risk culture and awareness: Increased focus on the actual implementation and effectiveness of risk culture in day-to-day business.
• Model risk management: More intensive review of the handling of model risks, particularly with the growing use of complex models and AI.
• Data quality and governance: Higher requirements for data architecture, data quality controls, and data governance processes.
• Element

3 – Capital risks:

• Climate and environmental risks: Integration of climate risks into capital planning and stress testing.
• Forward-looking assessments: Increased focus on forward-looking capital planning under various scenarios.
• Model-independent challenger approaches: Growing expectation to validate model-based results through alternative, simpler approaches.
• Element

4 – Liquidity and funding risks:

• Intraday liquidity management: Increased attention to the management of intraday liquidity risks.
• Funding strategy in the context of the sustainability transformation: Analysis of the impact of ESG factors on funding sources and costs.
• Liquidity stress scenarios: More intensive review of the appropriateness and severity of the stress scenarios used.

🔄 Recommended measures to address current focus areas:

• Gap analysis against current expectations: Conducting a structured analysis of existing processes, methods, and documentation against current supervisory expectations in the identified focus areas.
• Documentation supplementation: Targeted supplementation of SREP documentation with specific chapters or sections on current focus topics, even where these are not yet explicitly required.
• Sensitization of interview participants: Preparing all potential interview participants for questions on the new focus topics, regardless of their primary area of responsibility.
• Proactive communication: Development of a convincing narrative on one's own progress and planned measures in the focus areas for the supervisory dialogue.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's support approach for current focus areas:

• Regulatory intelligence: We keep you continuously informed about current developments in supervisory focus areas and expectations in the SREP context.
• Thematic gap analyses: We conduct focused analyses of your current processes, methods, and documentation against the latest supervisory expectations in focus areas.
• Concept development: We support you in developing convincing concepts to address current focus topics that are both methodologically sound and practically implementable.
• Communication strategy: We help you develop a proactive communication strategy for the supervisory dialogue on focus topics that convincingly presents your progress and planned measures.

How can a sustainable approach to continuous SREP preparation be established?

A sustainable approach to continuous SREP preparation goes far beyond a reactive response to specific review announcements. It integrates the requirements of the SREP into the institution's regular processes and structures, thereby enabling efficient, high-quality, and at all times available SREP readiness. ADVISORI supports institutions in developing and implementing a sustainable SREP preparation approach that both fulfills regulatory requirements and promotes operational efficiency.

🔄 Core elements of a sustainable SREP preparation approach:

• Integration into regular processes: Embedding SREP-relevant documentation creation and updating into regular business processes rather than as a separate activity.
• Continuous monitoring: Establishing ongoing monitoring of documentation quality, process effectiveness, and regulatory developments.
• Knowledge management: Systematic recording, preparation, and sharing of SREP-relevant knowledge within the organization.
• Cultural embedding: Promoting a culture that understands documentation quality and regulatory compliance as an integral part of good corporate governance.

📋 Structural framework for continuous SREP readiness:

• SREP office: Establishing a central coordination function responsible for the continuous monitoring, management, and improvement of SREP readiness.
• Integrated documentation architecture: Development of a coherent documentation structure that links regulatory requirements with internal management documents and minimizes redundancies.
• Rolling update cycles: Implementation of a systematic process for the regular review and updating of all SREP-relevant documents in defined cycles.
• Automated controls: Use of technology to automatically identify inconsistencies, gaps, or quality issues in documentation.

🔍 Processes for continuous improvement:

• Regulatory radar: Systematic observation and analysis of regulatory developments that could have implications for SREP requirements.
• Benchmark analyses: Regular comparison of one's own SREP preparation with best practices and supervisory expectations.
• Lessons learned process: Structured recording and analysis of experience from SREP reviews and other supervisory interactions.
• Quality circles: Regular cross-functional meetings to identify improvement potential and develop optimization measures.

💡 Success factors for sustainable SREP readiness:

• Executive sponsorship: Active engagement and support of senior management for the continuous SREP preparation process.
• Clear responsibilities: Unambiguous assignment of roles and responsibilities for all aspects of SREP preparation with defined accountability.
• Resource allocation: Provision of sufficient resources for the ongoing maintenance and further development of SREP readiness.
• Cultural integration: Embedding SREP readiness as part of the corporate culture and the self-understanding of all relevant staff.

🛠 ️ Technological support for sustainable SREP readiness:

• Document management systems: Use of specialized systems for the central management, versioning, and quality assurance of all SREP-relevant documents.
• Workflow management: Implementation of automated workflows for the creation, review, approval, and updating of documents.
• Collaboration platforms: Use of tools that promote cross-functional collaboration and knowledge sharing.
• Analytics and reporting: Use of data analysis tools to identify patterns, trends, and improvement potential in SREP preparation.

📊 Key metrics for measuring SREP readiness:

• Documentation quality: Assessment of the completeness, currency, consistency, and persuasiveness of SREP documentation.
• Process maturity: Measurement of the effectiveness and efficiency of SREP preparation processes.
• Knowledge level: Assessment of SREP-relevant knowledge among key individuals and potential interview participants.
• Implementation rate: Tracking of the implementation of improvement measures from earlier SREP reviews and internal analyses.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's support approach for sustainable SREP readiness:

• Framework development: We support you in developing a tailored framework for continuous SREP preparation aligned to your specific organizational framework.
• Process design: We help you establish efficient processes for integrating SREP preparation into your regular business operations.
• Maturity assessment: We conduct structured assessments of your current SREP readiness and systematically identify improvement potential.
• Change management: We support you in culturally embedding continuous SREP readiness in your organization through targeted change management measures.

Success Stories

Discover how we support companies in their digital transformation

Generative KI in der Fertigung

Bosch

KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz

Fallstudie
BOSCH KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz

Ergebnisse

Reduzierung der Implementierungszeit von AI-Anwendungen auf wenige Wochen
Verbesserung der Produktqualität durch frühzeitige Fehlererkennung
Steigerung der Effizienz in der Fertigung durch reduzierte Downtime

AI Automatisierung in der Produktion

Festo

Intelligente Vernetzung für zukunftsfähige Produktionssysteme

Fallstudie
FESTO AI Case Study

Ergebnisse

Verbesserung der Produktionsgeschwindigkeit und Flexibilität
Reduzierung der Herstellungskosten durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung
Erhöhung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch personalisierte Produkte

KI-gestützte Fertigungsoptimierung

Siemens

Smarte Fertigungslösungen für maximale Wertschöpfung

Fallstudie
Case study image for KI-gestützte Fertigungsoptimierung

Ergebnisse

Erhebliche Steigerung der Produktionsleistung
Reduzierung von Downtime und Produktionskosten
Verbesserung der Nachhaltigkeit durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung

Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel

Klöckner & Co

Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel

Fallstudie
Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel - Klöckner & Co

Ergebnisse

Über 2 Milliarden Euro Umsatz jährlich über digitale Kanäle
Ziel, bis 2022 60% des Umsatzes online zu erzielen
Verbesserung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch automatisierte Prozesse

Let's

Work Together!

Is your organization ready for the next step into the digital future? Contact us for a personal consultation.

Your strategic success starts here

Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management

Ready for the next step?

Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now

30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available

For optimal preparation of your strategy session:

Your strategic goals and challenges
Desired business outcomes and ROI expectations
Current compliance and risk situation
Stakeholders and decision-makers in the project

Prefer direct contact?

Direct hotline for decision-makers

Strategic inquiries via email

Detailed Project Inquiry

For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance