CRR III (first application 01/2025) and CRD VI (national transposition by 01/2026) impose far-reaching implementation requirements on banks: the output floor, revised credit risk standardised approach, new standardised measurement approach for operational risk, and binding FRTB capital requirements. We guide your institution from gap analysis through impact assessment to full implementation — structured, on schedule, and supervisory-compliant.
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
Or contact us directly:










A successful CRR/CRD implementation should not only aim for compliance, but also take into account the optimization of capital efficiency and risk management. Through a strategic approach, regulatory requirements can be transformed into a competitive advantage.
Years of Experience
Employees
Projects
Our CRR III/CRD VI implementation methodology is based on established regulatory project management standards and covers the entire implementation cycle — from initial regulatory analysis to stabilisation in day-to-day operations.
Regulatory analysis: Systematic evaluation of CRR III/CRD VI requirements and alignment with institution-specific circumstances
Gap analysis & impact assessment: Identification of implementation gaps, quantitative impact analysis on own funds and RWA
Implementation planning: Creation of an implementation roadmap with milestones, dependencies, and regulatory timeline (output floor phasing 2025�2030)
Technical execution: Adaptation of calculation engines (SA-CR, IRB, CVA, FRTB), reporting systems, and data infrastructure
Validation & SREP preparation: Verification of implementation, documentation, and preparation for supervisory examinations
"Implementing CRR/CRD requirements is a complex undertaking that demands in-depth regulatory know-how and a structured approach. Our experience shows that a strategic approach not only ensures compliance, but also unlocks potential for optimized capital allocation and improved risk management."

Head of Risk Management
We offer you tailored solutions for your digital transformation
We analyse your current implementation status against CRR III and CRD VI requirements and create a structured implementation plan. The gap analysis covers own funds requirements, output floor, credit risk (SA-CR/IRB), operational risk, CVA, FRTB, as well as CRD VI governance and ESG risk management.
We support the concrete execution of all CRR III/CRD VI requirements in your calculation systems, reporting processes, and governance structures � from RWA calculation adjustments through new reporting templates (DPM 4.0) to the introduction of prudential transition plans.
Choose the area that fits your requirements
Credit institutions must produce extensive disclosure reports under CRR Articles 431–455 – covering capital adequacy, credit risk, market risk and ESG risks. With the EBA Pillar 3 Data Hub and new ITS templates, requirements increase from 2026 onwards. ADVISORI delivers end-to-end implementation: gap analysis, data integration, automated report generation and CRR III/CRD VI migration.
The Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) is a central element of banking supervision under CRR/CRD. Thorough preparation and comprehensive documentation are essential for a positive outcome. We support you in the systematic preparation and professional documentation of your SREP-relevant processes and controls.
Automate complex regulatory reporting processes and minimize manual interventions. Our tailored process automation solutions for regulatory reporting increase efficiency, reduce sources of error, and enable the timely submission of regulatory reports.
CRR III introduces the output floor, which limits the capital relief from internal models (IRB approach) to a maximum of 27.5% compared to the standardised approach — with a phase-in from
2025 to
2030 (gradually rising from 50% to 72.5%). The credit risk standardised approach (SA-CR) is fundamentally revised: new risk weights for real estate exposures, more granular exposure classes, and stricter requirements for external ratings. For institutions using the IRB approach, the option for partial use applications is removed for certain portfolios. Implementation requires adjustments to calculation engines, data infrastructure, and reporting processes.
CRR III is directly applicable as an EU Regulation since
1 January 2025. CRD VI, as a Directive, must be transposed into national law — applicable from
11 January 2026. The output floor is phased in: 50% from 2025, rising annually to 72.5% by 2030. FRTB capital requirements have been binding since January 2025, with certain market risk framework elements postponed to January 2026. EBA guidelines on ESG disclosures apply from
31 December 2026. Institutions should align their implementation roadmap to these regulatory milestones to avoid compliance gaps.
A CRR III gap analysis follows four steps: (1) Stocktaking of current capital calculations, risk models, and reporting processes. (2) Systematic comparison against new CRR III requirements — structured by credit risk (SA-CR/IRB), operational risk (standardised measurement approach), CVA, FRTB, output floor, and disclosure. (3) Quantitative impact assessment on own funds, RWA, and capital ratios. (4) Prioritised action plan with implementation roadmap, responsibilities, and timeline. Particular data challenges arise from requirements for property valuations, external ratings, and granular exposure classification.
The output floor is one of the central innovations of CRR III (also known as Basel 3.1). It caps the benefit institutions can derive from using internal models (IRB approach) versus the standardised approach. By 2030, risk-weighted assets (RWA) from internal models must not fall below 72.5% of the SA-CR result. During the transition phase (2025�2030), the floor rises incrementally. For implementation, this means: parallel RWA calculation under SA-CR and IRB, capital planning adjustments, assessment of strategic portfolio decisions, and potentially realigning the model strategy.
CRD VI strengthens governance requirements for credit institutions: stricter fit-and-proper assessments for management bodies, enhanced risk committee requirements, and for the first time, a mandatory prudential transition plan. In the ESG domain, CRD VI requires systematic consideration of sustainability risks in the risk strategy, ICAAP, and business strategy. National transposition varies by member state — in Germany via the BRUBEG Act, encompassing adjustments to the Banking Act (KWG) and MaRisk. Institutions must adapt their governance structures, reporting processes, and risk models accordingly.
ADVISORI supports credit institutions through the entire CRR III/CRD VI implementation cycle: (1) Regulatory analysis and gap analysis with quantitative impact assessment. (2) Creation of an institution-specific implementation roadmap with milestones and dependencies. (3) Technical execution in calculation systems, reporting software, and data infrastructure. (4) Adaptation of governance structures and processes in line with CRD VI. (5) Validation of implementation and preparation for SREP examinations. Our consultants bring extensive experience in regulatory transformation projects at credit institutions of varying sizes.
The Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) is part of CRR III and introduces binding capital requirements for market risk. Banks must choose between the revised standardised approach (SA) and the internal model approach (IMA) — with tightened approval requirements for the IMA. FRTB implementation requires the adoption of new risk measures (Expected Shortfall replacing VaR), establishment of trading desks per regulatory specifications, adaptation of P&L attribution tests, and integration into existing regulatory reporting. Certain market risk rules were postponed to January 2026.
Data sourcing is one of the biggest challenges in CRR III implementation. New requirements particularly affect: granular property valuation data for revised risk weights, external rating information for new SA-CR classification, data to differentiate specialised lending and infrastructure exposures, and expanded Pillar III disclosure data. These data are frequently distributed across multiple systems, not available at the required granularity, or require new interfaces to external data providers. An early data quality review is therefore a critical success factor for any CRR III implementation project.
Discover how we support companies in their digital transformation
Klöckner & Co
Digital Transformation in Steel Trading

Siemens
Smart Manufacturing Solutions for Maximum Value Creation

Festo
Intelligent Networking for Future-Proof Production Systems

Bosch
AI Process Optimization for Improved Production Efficiency

Is your organization ready for the next step into the digital future? Contact us for a personal consultation.
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
Direct hotline for decision-makers
Strategic inquiries via email
For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance