The EU AI Act requires solid risk management systems for high-risk AI systems. We support you in developing and implementing comprehensive, compliance-conformant risk control processes.
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
Or contact us directly:










The risk management system must be proportionate to the risk class of the AI system and continuously updated throughout the entire lifecycle. A proactive, systematic approach is essential for successful compliance.
Years of Experience
Employees
Projects
We develop a regulation-compliant risk management system under Article 9 EU AI Act with you, systematically integrated into your existing processes.
Inventory: Identification and classification of your AI systems according to the AI Act risk categories (Annex I and III)
Risk assessment: Systematic analysis of identified risks per Article 9(2) — risks under intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse
Measure design: Development of appropriate risk mitigation measures prioritising elimination, reduction and residual risk acceptance
Testing and validation: Definition of metrics and probabilistic thresholds per Article 9(7) for systematic pre-market testing
Integration and operation: Embedding the risk management system into existing governance structures with continuous monitoring and updates
"A solid risk management system for AI is not only a regulatory requirement, but a strategic building block for trustworthy AI. With systematic approaches, organisations can ensure compliance while continuously improving the quality and reliability of their AI systems."

Head of Digital Transformation
Expertise & Experience:
11+ years of experience, Applied Computer Science degree, Strategic planning and management of AI projects, Cyber Security, Secure Software Development, AI
We offer you tailored solutions for your digital transformation
Comprehensive assessment of your AI systems and existing risk management processes to identify compliance gaps and optimisation potential.
Development and implementation of tailored, EU AI Act-compliant risk management systems with all required processes and controls.
Choose the area that fits your requirements
Article 10 of the EU AI Act imposes strict requirements on training, validation and test data for high-risk AI systems. We support you in building data governance that ensures data quality, detects bias and meets the documentation obligations under the AI Regulation.
Article 14 of the EU AI Act requires providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems to implement effective human oversight. We help you establish human-in-the-loop processes, stop mechanisms, and monitoring frameworks — compliant by the 2 August 2026 deadline.
Article 12 of the EU AI Act requires providers and deployers of high-risk AI systems to implement automatic logging of all system-relevant events throughout the lifecycle. We support you in building compliant logging systems, audit trail structures and retention policies.
The EU AI Act places high demands on the technical documentation of high-risk AI systems. We support you in creating comprehensive, compliance-conformant documentation that meets all regulatory standards.
Article
9 EU AI Act requires providers of high-risk AI systems to establish, implement, document and maintain a risk management system. The system must be planned and run as a continuous iterative process throughout the entire lifecycle of the AI system. Specifically, it covers: (a) identification and analysis of known and foreseeable risks, (b) estimation and evaluation of risks arising from intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse, (c) evaluation of further risks based on post-market monitoring data under Article 72, and (d) adoption of appropriate risk management measures. The implementation deadline for high-risk AI systems is August 2026.
The risk management process under Article
9 AI Act comprises four core steps: First, risk identification — the systematic determination of all known and foreseeable risks to health, safety and fundamental rights. Second, risk assessment — the estimation of identified risks considering intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse. Third, risk mitigation — determining appropriate measures following the principle: first elimination, then reduction, finally documented acceptance of residual risks. Fourth, validation — testing against predefined metrics and probabilistic thresholds before placing on the market.
The risk management system under Article
9 AI Act differs from traditional risk management in several ways: It is specifically designed for the entire lifecycle of an AI system — from conception to decommissioning. It requires consideration of AI-specific risks such as algorithmic bias, lack of explainability and unintended impacts on fundamental rights. The system must also account for interactions between the various requirements in Chapter III Section
2 (Article 9(4)). Unlike traditional risk approaches, the AI Act also mandates specific testing requirements with predefined metrics and probabilistic thresholds.
Article 9(7) AI Act requires high-risk AI systems to be tested at appropriate points throughout the development process — and in any case before placing on the market or putting into service. Tests must be performed against predefined metrics and probabilistic thresholds appropriate for the intended purpose. Particular consideration must be given to whether the system is intended for minors or other vulnerable groups (Article 9(9)). Testing under real-world conditions may be conducted in accordance with Article 60.
Under Article 9(6) AI Act, residual risks that cannot be fully eliminated through mitigation measures must be classified as acceptable and documented. The residual risks, taken together with the measures adopted, must not pose an unacceptable risk. The provider must inform users about residual risks and provide appropriate instructions for use. Documentation of residual risk acceptance forms part of the technical documentation under Article
11 and is reviewed by market surveillance authorities.
For high-risk AI systems under Annex III of the EU AI Act, the transition period runs until
2 August 2026. From that date, all providers of such systems must be able to demonstrate a complete risk management system in accordance with Article 9. For AI systems used as safety components of products under Annex I, the requirements apply from
2 August 2027. We recommend starting implementation now, as building a comprehensive risk management system typically takes
6 to
12 months.
ADVISORI supports the complete implementation of Article
9 AI Act in four phases: (1) inventory and classification of your AI systems according to the AI Act risk categories, (2) building the risk management system with risk assessment procedures, metrics and documentation templates, (3) integration into existing governance structures such as ERM frameworks or ISO 31000, and (4) support with testing and validation before placing on the market. We account for interactions with other requirements including the quality management system (Article 17), technical documentation (Article 11) and post-market monitoring (Article 72).
Discover how we support companies in their digital transformation
Klöckner & Co
Digital Transformation in Steel Trading

Siemens
Smart Manufacturing Solutions for Maximum Value Creation

Festo
Intelligent Networking for Future-Proof Production Systems

Bosch
AI Process Optimization for Improved Production Efficiency

Is your organization ready for the next step into the digital future? Contact us for a personal consultation.
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
Direct hotline for decision-makers
Strategic inquiries via email
For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance