LkSG Risk Analysis: Supply Chain Due Diligence Under § 5
ADVISORI designs and conducts your LkSG risk analysis under § 5 of the German Supply Chain Act: from abstract country and sector screening to concrete supplier assessments and prioritized measures. You receive a defensible, BAFA-oriented methodology that anchors human rights and environmental due diligence in your procurement processes.
- ✓Systematic LkSG risk analysis methodology
- ✓Supply chain risk assessment and classification
- ✓BAFA-compliant due diligence processes
Your strategic success starts here
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
For optimal preparation of your strategy session:
- Your strategic goals and objectives
- Desired business outcomes and ROI
- Steps already taken
Or contact us directly:
Certifications, Partners and more...










Systematic Risk Analysis Under the Supply Chain Act
ADVISORI in Numbers
11+
Years of Experience
120+
Employees
520+
Projects

Melanie Düring
Head of Risk Management
Our Services
We offer you tailored solutions for your digital transformation
Abstract and Concrete Risk Analysis
We design and conduct the two-stage risk analysis under § 5 LkSG: an abstract screening of country, sector and commodity risks, followed by a concrete assessment of prioritized suppliers and business areas. The methodology is fully documented and repeatable.
- Country, sector and commodity risk screening
- Concrete supplier-level risk assessment
- Prioritization by severity, likelihood and leverage
- Appropriateness criteria per § 3 (2) LkSG
- Audit-ready methodology documentation
Supplier Risk Assessment and Classification
We build a data-driven supplier segmentation that focuses due diligence effort where risk is highest. Questionnaires, evidence checks and external risk data are combined into a consistent supplier risk score.
- Risk-based supplier segmentation model
- Due diligence questionnaires and evidence review
- Human rights and environmental risk indicators
- Integration of external risk data sources
- Escalation logic for high-risk suppliers
Preventive and Remedial Measures
We translate risk analysis results into effective measures: supplier codes of conduct, contractual assurances, training and structured remediation plans, including the effectiveness reviews required by §§ 6 and 7 LkSG.
- Supplier code of conduct and contract clauses
- Training and capacity-building concepts
- Remedial action plans per § 7 LkSG
- Effectiveness reviews and measurable KPIs
LkSG Governance and CSDDD Readiness
We anchor the risk analysis in a sustainable operating model with clear responsibilities, an annual and event-driven cycle, and interfaces to the complaints procedure — designed to transition smoothly to the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive.
- Annual and event-driven analysis cycle
- Interface to the complaints procedure per § 8
- Management reporting and documentation
- Transition planning towards the EU CSDDD
Our Competencies
Choose the area that fits your requirements
Navigate safely through the growing requirements for sustainability and climate reporting. We support you in meeting regulatory disclosure obligations, optimizing your reporting processes, and strategically using sustainability information for your stakeholder communication.
Frequently Asked Questions about Supply Chain Act (LkSG) Risk Analysis
How does the LkSG risk analysis under § 5 of the Supply Chain Act work?
The LkSG risk analysis under § 5 is a systematic procedure for identifying, assessing, and prioritising human rights and environmental risks across the entire supply chain. It forms the core element of risk management under the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act.
The process consists of three main steps:
1. Risk identification: Capturing all potential risks in your own business area and at direct suppliers through country risk assessments, industry analyses, and supplier-specific assessments.
2. Risk assessment and prioritisation: Evaluating identified risks by severity, probability of occurrence, and the company’s degree of influence. The BAFA guidance recommends a multi-level methodology.
3. Deriving measures: Developing appropriate prevention and remediation measures based on risk prioritisation, with clear responsibilities and timelines.
The results of the risk analysis must be documented and reported to management. ADVISORI supports the development of a structured risk analysis methodology that covers both legal requirements and industry-specific considerations.
What steps does supply chain risk assessment under the LkSG involve?
Supply chain risk assessment under the LkSG involves five essential steps that must be completed systematically.
1. Supply chain inventory: Mapping all direct suppliers with capture of locations, product categories, and sub-suppliers. Prioritisation by procurement volume and strategic importance.
2. Abstract risk analysis: Evaluation of country risks, industry indices, and external data sources to identify high-risk suppliers. Use of risk indices such as the BAFA country risk report.
3. Concrete risk analysis: In-depth review of prioritised suppliers through self-assessments, on-site audits, and document reviews. Assessment of actual human rights and environmental risks.
4. Risk classification: Categorisation of risks by severity, reversibility, and number of affected persons. Creation of a risk map with prioritisation levels.
5. Measure derivation: Development of appropriate prevention measures per risk class. Definition of KPIs for effectiveness measurement.
ADVISORI guides companies through implementing this risk assessment methodology and integrating it into existing risk management processes.
How often must the risk analysis under the Supply Chain Act be conducted?
The regular risk analysis under the Supply Chain Act must be conducted at least once annually. In addition, an event-triggered risk analysis is required when substantiated knowledge of potential violations emerges.
The LkSG distinguishes two analysis types:
1. Regular risk analysis (annual): Covers the company’s own business area and all direct suppliers. Involves updating the risk map and reviewing existing measures.
2. Event-triggered risk analysis: Triggered by substantiated knowledge of risks at indirect suppliers, significant changes in business activities, complaints through the grievance mechanism, or new insights into industry risks.
In practice, the BAFA recommends continuous monitoring to supplement the annual mandatory analysis. Companies should establish a monitoring system that detects changes at suppliers early.
ADVISORI supports the establishment of a structured analysis calendar and automated early warning systems for your supply chain.
What due diligence obligations does the LkSG risk analysis examine at direct suppliers?
The LkSG risk analysis at direct suppliers examines compliance with the due diligence obligations defined in § 2 of the Supply Chain Act in two core areas.
Human rights due diligence:
Environmental due diligence:
The risk analysis must be appropriate and effective, meaning the type and scope of the analysis must correspond to the identified risk potential. ADVISORI develops industry-specific risk analysis frameworks that systematically cover all due diligence obligations.
What is the difference between abstract and concrete risk analysis under the LkSG?
The LkSG provides for two levels of risk analysis that differ in depth, scope, and trigger.
Abstract risk analysis:
Concrete risk analysis:
The BAFA expects companies to methodically conduct and document both analysis levels. ADVISORI supports the development of a multi-level analysis methodology that efficiently connects both levels.
Latest Insights on Supply Chain Act (LkSG) Risk Analysis
Discover our latest articles, expert knowledge and practical guides about Supply Chain Act (LkSG) Risk Analysis

AI governance does not replace what banks already do well. It builds on it. This article shows how data governance, model governance, and internal governance combine into a framework that satisfies supervisors and enables AI at scale: from dataset suitability and continuous monitoring to accountability across the three lines of defense.

9th MaRisk Amendment 2026: What Changes for Banks Now
The 9th MaRisk Amendment is final: more proportionality, SNCI reliefs, new size categories. All changes, deadlines and an implementation roadmap to 2027.

The EU Benchmarks Regulation Tightens Again: What ESMA's 2026 Internal Control Guidelines Mean for Benchmark Administrators
The EU Benchmarks Regulation has acquired another layer. On 5 May 2026, ESMA published new Guidelines on Internal Controls that apply from 1 October 2026 — the latest step in a regulatory story running straight back to the LIBOR scandal. Here's what benchmark administrators and credit rating agencies now have to demonstrate.

The EBA Climate Stress Test: The New 2027 Climate Risk Module and What Banks Should Do
The draft 2027 EBA stress test introduces a dedicated climate risk module, layering transition and flood shocks onto the adverse macro-financial scenario. It leaves capital ratios untouched for now, but it produces exactly the kind of supervisory dataset that shapes future cycles, so the draft is best treated as a dry run.

PD Model Backtesting in the Spotlight: What the EBA's 2026 Paper Means for European Banks
For two decades, the performance of banks' PD models stayed inside confidential supervisory channels. The EBA's April 2026 Staff Paper changes that — applying systematic PD model backtesting across EU IRB banks, sharpening the binomial test for both asset and serial correlation, and putting a Tier 1 capital number on the result.

The credit risk function of 2026 looks materially different from the one most banks still operate. Here are the five shifts, from generative AI to ESG integration, that risk managers should plan for now.
Success Stories
Discover how we support companies in their digital transformation
Digitalization in Steel Trading
Steel trading company from Germany
Digital Transformation in Steel Trading
Results
AI-Powered Manufacturing Optimization
Industrial group from Germany
Smart Manufacturing Solutions for Maximum Value Creation
Results
AI Automation in Production
Automation specialist from Germany
Intelligent Networking for Future-Proof Production Systems
Results
Generative AI in Manufacturing
Technology group from Germany
AI Process Optimization for Improved Production Efficiency
Results
Let's
Work Together!
Is your organization ready for the next step into the digital future? Contact us for a personal consultation.
Your strategic success starts here
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
Ready for the next step?
Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
For optimal preparation of your strategy session:
Prefer direct contact?
Direct hotline for decision-makers
Strategic inquiries via email
Detailed Project Inquiry
For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance