Risk model development for financial institutions. Credit, market and operational risk models to regulatory standards.
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
Or contact us directly:










Combining classical statistical methods with modern machine learning approaches can improve the forecast accuracy of risk models by up to 35%. Especially in identifying non-linear relationships and complex interaction effects, hybrid models show clear advantages over purely traditional approaches.
Years of Experience
Employees
Projects
We pursue a structured yet flexible approach to model development that ensures both methodological rigor and practical applicability. Our proven methodology ensures that your models are not only statistically sound but also optimally tailored to your individual requirements.
Phase 1: Requirements Analysis & Conception - Identification of specific requirements, data availability, and suitable modeling approaches
Phase 2: Data Preparation & Analysis - Careful preparation, quality assurance, and exploratory analysis of model data
Phase 3: Model Development - Iterative implementation, calibration, and optimization of the model considering statistical and professional criteria
Phase 4: Validation - Rigorous examination of conceptual appropriateness, methodological implementation, and empirical performance
Phase 5: Implementation & Knowledge Transfer - Support with integration into existing systems and processes as well as comprehensive knowledge transfer
"Successful risk modeling is far more than the mere application of statistical methods – it is the art of recognizing complex relationships, mapping them in a coherent mathematical framework, and at the same time making them practical. Only when these three dimensions are optimally balanced does a model emerge that is both analytically solid and commercially valuable."

Head of Risk Management
We offer you tailored solutions for your digital transformation
Development and optimization of advanced models for measuring, quantifying, and managing credit risks. Our solutions encompass both parameter and portfolio models and consider regulatory requirements as well as economic objectives.
Conception and implementation of differentiated models for quantifying market price risks. We develop solutions that are optimally suited for both regulatory reporting and internal risk management.
Development and validation of quantitative models for measuring and managing liquidity risks. Our solutions encompass both short-term liquidity forecasts and structural liquidity analyses.
Use of effective machine learning and AI technologies for more precise and differentiated risk modeling. We develop advanced models that can capture complex, non-linear relationships without sacrificing transparency and explainability.
Choose the area that fits your requirements
We support financial institutions in developing and validating PD, LGD, and EAD models, optimizing internal rating systems, and implementing Basel IV regulatory requirements.
Liquidity management and liquidity risk management for banks. LCR, NSFR, stress testing and regulatory liquidity requirements.
Market risk assessment and limit systems are regulatory obligations for financial institutions. We develop VaR models, implement stress tests and build hierarchical limit systems compliant with CRR, MaRisk and FRTB.
Comprehensive model governance framework for banks and financial institutions. Model risk management per SR 11-7, model validation, inventory management, and regulatory compliance for risk models.
Independent model validation for risk models per MaRisk AT 4.3.5, EBA guidelines and BCBS 239. We assess model accuracy, assumptions, data quality and regulatory conformity — quantitatively and qualitatively.
Professional portfolio risk analysis for financial institutions: From quantification through stress testing to data-driven portfolio optimization. We identify correlations, assess concentration risks, and develop effective limit systems for your portfolio.
Comprehensive consulting for the development and implementation of stress tests and scenario analysis to assess your resilience and strategic preparation for multiple future developments.
Developing an IRB-compliant PD model follows a structured process: First, data quality and representativeness of historical default time series are assessed, typically spanning at least five years. This is followed by risk driver selection through univariate and multivariate analyses. Modeling typically uses logistic regression, supplemented by gradient boosting for nonlinear relationships. The model is then calibrated to deliver point-in-time or through-the-cycle estimates. Before submission to the supervisory authority, the model undergoes independent validation including backtesting, discriminatory power analysis (Gini/AUROC) and calibration tests.
LGD models (Loss Given Default) estimate the loss rate upon default, incorporating collateral values, recovery proceeds and resolution timelines. They often use two-stage models: first classifying between total loss and partial recovery, then estimating the recovery rate via regression. EAD models (Exposure at Default) forecast the exposure amount at the point of default, considering credit line utilization and conversion factors. Unlike PD models that deliver point estimates of default probability, LGD and EAD models require distribution modeling and are more dependent on macroeconomic downturn scenarios.
Regulatory authorities require formal approval for IRB models based on CRR/CRD requirements. Key requirements include: representative data foundations with sufficient observation periods, transparent methodology with documented assumptions, regular independent validation by a unit separate from development, ongoing performance monitoring with defined thresholds and a model risk management framework. Institutions must also comply with EBA guidelines on PD and LGD estimation and demonstrate the use test, meaning actual use of models in credit decisions and risk management.
Integrating machine learning into IRB models requires a hybrid approach ensuring interpretability and regulatory acceptance. Proven methods include: gradient boosting (XGBoost, LightGBM) as challenger models for benchmarking, SHAP values and LIME for explaining nonlinear predictions, ML-based feature engineering to identify new risk drivers that feed into interpretable models, and ensemble methods combining logistic regression with tree-based approaches. Thorough documentation following SR 11–7 and EBA requirements is essential for regulatory approval.
Market risk model development covers Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall models accounting for nonlinear market dynamics. Methodologies include parametric approaches (variance-covariance), historical simulation and Monte Carlo simulation. Advanced models use GARCH processes for time-varying volatilities, regime-switching models for different market phases, copula methods for complex dependency structures and Extreme Value Theory for tail risks. In the FRTB context, we develop both standardized approach and IMA models with risk factor eligibility tests and P&L attribution.
Data quality is the foundation of every reliable risk model. We systematically verify: completeness of historical default time series spanning five to ten years, sample representativeness across all portfolio segments, consistency of definitions across source systems, correct default definition per CRR Article 178, and appropriate risk driver granularity. Automated data validation routines identify outliers and inconsistencies. A data governance framework with defined data ownership structures and regular quality reviews ensures ongoing data quality.
External consulting for model development provides methodological breadth from numerous projects across different institutions, current knowledge of regulatory developments such as CRR III and EBA guidelines, independent perspective on existing model landscapes and proven methodologies that shorten development timelines. ADVISORI combines over eleven years of risk modeling experience with expertise from more than
520 projects. Our consultants understand both supervisory requirements and the practical challenges of integrating models into existing IT infrastructures and risk management processes.
Discover how we support companies in their digital transformation
Klöckner & Co
Digital Transformation in Steel Trading

Siemens
Smart Manufacturing Solutions for Maximum Value Creation

Festo
Intelligent Networking for Future-Proof Production Systems

Bosch
AI Process Optimization for Improved Production Efficiency

Is your organization ready for the next step into the digital future? Contact us for a personal consultation.
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
Direct hotline for decision-makers
Strategic inquiries via email
For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance
Discover our latest articles, expert knowledge and practical guides about Model Development

How the new IRB rules transform many previously time-consuming model changes into simple notifications—thereby drastically shortening approval times and significantly accelerating implementation

An ESG dashboard makes sustainability performance visible and auditable. This guide covers essential environmental, social, and governance KPIs, CSRD/ESRS alignment, data collection strategies, and tool selection for organizations building audit-ready ESG reporting.

DORA Articles 5–15 establish the ICT risk management framework that financial institutions must implement. This guide breaks down governance, framework structure, ICT systems management, detection, business continuity, and the learning loop — with a practical implementation roadmap.

A Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is mandatory for high-risk data processing under GDPR. This step-by-step guide covers when a DPIA is required, the 6-step methodology, risk evaluation, mitigating measures, and documentation requirements for regulatory compliance.

Third-party risk management (TPRM) identifies, assesses, and mitigates risks from vendors and suppliers. This guide covers the full TPRM lifecycle, risk classification, due diligence methods, continuous monitoring, DORA Articles 28–30 requirements, and practical tools for every maturity level.

Transform your control processes: With RiskGeniusAI, compliance, efficiency and transparency in the ICS become measurably better.