How to Build an ERM Framework
An effective enterprise risk management framework connects risk strategy with operational execution. We guide you through building an ERM framework based on COSO ERM and ISO 31000 or optimize your existing risk management framework.
- ✓Build ERM frameworks based on COSO ERM and ISO 31000
- ✓Gap analysis and maturity assessment of existing frameworks
- ✓Integration into governance structures and decision-making
Your strategic success starts here
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
For optimal preparation of your strategy session:
- Your strategic goals and objectives
- Desired business outcomes and ROI
- Steps already taken
Or contact us directly:
Certifications, Partners and more...










What Steps Does an Effective ERM Framework Require?
Why ADVISORI for Your ERM Framework
- Experience with ERM implementations at banks, insurers, and corporations
- Certified expertise in COSO ERM, ISO 31000, and MaRisk
- Pragmatic approach from conception to operational rollout
Practical Tip
Start with a gap analysis of your existing risk management against COSO ERM or ISO 31000. This identifies your biggest areas for improvement and allows you to build your ERM framework step by step.
ADVISORI in Numbers
11+
Years of Experience
120+
Employees
520+
Projects
We support you with a structured approach in developing and implementing your tailored ERM framework.
Our Approach:
Analysis of current risk management practices and requirements
Development of a tailored ERM framework based on international standards
Implementation, training, and continuous improvement

Melanie Düring
Head of Risk Management
Our Services
We offer you tailored solutions for your digital transformation
ERM Framework Design
Development of a tailored Enterprise Risk Management framework based on international standards
- Analysis of the risk situation and requirements
- Design based on COSO ERM and ISO 31000
- Development of governance structures and processes
ERM Framework Optimization
Analysis and optimization of existing risk management frameworks for maximum effectiveness
- Gap analysis and maturity assessment
- Process optimization and efficiency improvement
- Technology modernization
ERM Framework Implementation
Support in the practical implementation and integration of the ERM framework into your organization
- Implementation planning and change management
- Training and knowledge transfer
- Monitoring and continuous improvement
Our Competencies
Choose the area that fits your requirements
Targeted improvement of existing Enterprise Risk Management frameworks. From maturity assessment through gap analysis to sustainable optimization of your risk management structures.
Integration of enterprise risk management into the corporate target system. Risk as part of strategic steering and decision-making.
Integrate enterprise risk management into KPI systems, Balanced Scorecards and incentive structures. We develop risk-adjusted metrics like RORAC and RAROC and embed risk perspectives in your management processes for value-oriented corporate governance.
We help you build a strong risk culture and a clear risk strategy — from assessment through risk appetite framework design to sustainable organizational embedding. MaRisk-compliant and proven in practice.
Frequently Asked Questions about Building and Optimizing ERM Frameworks
What is an ERM framework and what are its core components?
An enterprise risk management framework is a systematic structure for organization-wide risk management. Core components include: a governance structure with clear roles and responsibilities (Three Lines of Defense), a risk taxonomy for consistent categorization, defined processes for risk identification, assessment and mitigation, key risk indicators (KRIs) as an early warning system, and structured risk reporting to the board and supervisory board.
What is the difference between COSO ERM and ISO 31000?
COSO ERM is a detailed framework with five components (Governance and Culture, Strategy and Objective-Setting, Performance, Review and Revision, Information, Communication and Reporting). It is widely used in the US and integrates risk management into corporate strategy. ISO
31000 is a principle-based international standard with a flexible process model. It is industry-agnostic and focuses on continuous improvement. In practice, many organizations combine elements of both approaches.
How long does it take to build an ERM framework?
A basic ERM framework can be established in
3 to
6 months. Full implementation including integration across all business units, building a risk culture, and establishing mature reporting takes
12 to
24 months. The key is phased implementation: start with your highest-risk areas and expand the framework progressively.
What role does the Three Lines of Defense model play?
The Three Lines of Defense model defines three levels of responsibility: The first line (operational units) manages risks in day-to-day business. The second line (risk management and compliance) develops frameworks, policies, and methodologies and oversees the first line. The third line (internal audit) independently reviews the effectiveness of the first two lines. Above all three lines sits the board and supervisory board as the overarching governance body.
What does implementing an ERM framework cost?
Costs depend on organization size and maturity level. For mid-sized companies, expect EUR 50,
000 to 150,
000 for design and initial implementation. For large enterprises and regulated financial institutions, investments range from EUR 200,
000 to 500,000. This includes gap analysis, framework design, process development, training, and implementation support.
Which regulatory requirements does an ERM framework address?
A structured ERM framework addresses MaRisk requirements from BaFin, Basel III/IV for credit institutions, Solvency II for insurers, the German Corporate Governance Code (DCGK), and cross-industry standards such as GDPR and the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act. It also provides the foundation for ISO 27001 and SOX compliance.
How do you measure the maturity of an ERM framework?
Maturity is assessed using established models across five levels: Initial (ad-hoc), Repeatable (documented processes), Defined (standardized), Managed (quantitatively measured), and Optimizing (continuous improvement). Assessment criteria include governance structures, process quality, data integration, risk culture, and alignment with corporate strategy.
Latest Insights on Building and Optimizing ERM Frameworks
Discover our latest articles, expert knowledge and practical guides about Building and Optimizing ERM Frameworks

AI governance does not replace what banks already do well. It builds on it. This article shows how data governance, model governance, and internal governance combine into a framework that satisfies supervisors and enables AI at scale: from dataset suitability and continuous monitoring to accountability across the three lines of defense.

9th MaRisk Amendment 2026: What Changes for Banks Now
The 9th MaRisk Amendment is final: more proportionality, SNCI reliefs, new size categories. All changes, deadlines and an implementation roadmap to 2027.

The EU Benchmarks Regulation Tightens Again: What ESMA's 2026 Internal Control Guidelines Mean for Benchmark Administrators
The EU Benchmarks Regulation has acquired another layer. On 5 May 2026, ESMA published new Guidelines on Internal Controls that apply from 1 October 2026 — the latest step in a regulatory story running straight back to the LIBOR scandal. Here's what benchmark administrators and credit rating agencies now have to demonstrate.

The EBA Climate Stress Test: The New 2027 Climate Risk Module and What Banks Should Do
The draft 2027 EBA stress test introduces a dedicated climate risk module, layering transition and flood shocks onto the adverse macro-financial scenario. It leaves capital ratios untouched for now, but it produces exactly the kind of supervisory dataset that shapes future cycles, so the draft is best treated as a dry run.

PD Model Backtesting in the Spotlight: What the EBA's 2026 Paper Means for European Banks
For two decades, the performance of banks' PD models stayed inside confidential supervisory channels. The EBA's April 2026 Staff Paper changes that — applying systematic PD model backtesting across EU IRB banks, sharpening the binomial test for both asset and serial correlation, and putting a Tier 1 capital number on the result.

The credit risk function of 2026 looks materially different from the one most banks still operate. Here are the five shifts, from generative AI to ESG integration, that risk managers should plan for now.
Success Stories
Discover how we support companies in their digital transformation
Digitalization in Steel Trading
Steel trading company from Germany
Digital Transformation in Steel Trading
Results
AI-Powered Manufacturing Optimization
Industrial group from Germany
Smart Manufacturing Solutions for Maximum Value Creation
Results
AI Automation in Production
Automation specialist from Germany
Intelligent Networking for Future-Proof Production Systems
Results
Generative AI in Manufacturing
Technology group from Germany
AI Process Optimization for Improved Production Efficiency
Results
Let's
Work Together!
Is your organization ready for the next step into the digital future? Contact us for a personal consultation.
Your strategic success starts here
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
Ready for the next step?
Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
For optimal preparation of your strategy session:
Prefer direct contact?
Direct hotline for decision-makers
Strategic inquiries via email
Detailed Project Inquiry
For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance