1. Home/
  2. Services/
  3. Information Security/
  4. It Risk Management/
  5. Management Review En

Newsletter abonnieren

Bleiben Sie auf dem Laufenden mit den neuesten Trends und Entwicklungen

Durch Abonnieren stimmen Sie unseren Datenschutzbestimmungen zu.

A
ADVISORI FTC GmbH

Transformation. Innovation. Sicherheit.

Firmenadresse

Kaiserstraße 44

60329 Frankfurt am Main

Deutschland

Auf Karte ansehen

Kontakt

info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01

Mo-Fr: 9:00 - 18:00 Uhr

Unternehmen

Leistungen

Social Media

Folgen Sie uns und bleiben Sie auf dem neuesten Stand.

  • /
  • /

© 2024 ADVISORI FTC GmbH. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Your browser does not support the video tag.
Informed Decisions for Your IT Security Strategy

Management Review

Establish a systematic process for regular review and assessment of your IT security measures at the leadership level. Our structured Management Reviews create transparency about the status of your risk management, identify optimization potential, and support the strategic development of your IT security.

  • ✓Solid decision-making foundation for strategic IT security direction
  • ✓Transparent overview of security measure status and risks
  • ✓Evidence of active leadership responsibility for information security
  • ✓Continuous improvement through structured review processes

Your strategic success starts here

Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management

30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available

For optimal preparation of your strategy session:

  • Your strategic goals and objectives
  • Desired business outcomes and ROI
  • Steps already taken

Or contact us directly:

info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01

Certifications, Partners and more...

ISO 9001 CertifiedISO 27001 CertifiedISO 14001 CertifiedBeyondTrust PartnerBVMW Bundesverband MitgliedMitigant PartnerGoogle PartnerTop 100 InnovatorMicrosoft AzureAmazon Web Services

Systematic Monitoring and Control of Your IT Security

Our Strengths

  • Many years of experience in developing and conducting Management Reviews
  • Comprehensive expertise in IT governance, risk management, and compliance
  • Practice-oriented approach with focus on added value and feasibility
  • Experienced consultants with excellent moderation and communication skills
⚠

Expert Tip

Effective Management Reviews are more than a formal compliance exercise. Through the right rhythm, meaningful KPIs, and targeted preparation, they become a valuable strategic tool. Our experience shows that the combination of regular operational reviews and quarterly or semi-annual strategic reviews is particularly effective. This keeps leadership continuously informed without being overwhelmed by details, while also recognizing long-term developments and making strategic adjustments.

ADVISORI in Numbers

11+

Years of Experience

120+

Employees

520+

Projects

Establishing and conducting effective Management Reviews requires a structured approach that considers both organizational circumstances and regulatory requirements. Our proven approach comprises five phases that build upon each other and create a sustainable review process.

Our Approach:

Phase 1: Analysis and Conception - Assessment of existing governance structures, identification of relevant stakeholders, and definition of individual requirements for the Management Review process

Phase 2: Development of Review Framework - Definition of review formats, content, and rhythms, establishment of appropriate KPIs and metric systems, establishment of escalation paths

Phase 3: Implementation and Piloting - Development of document templates and reporting tools, training of participants, conducting a first Management Review as pilot

Phase 4: Execution and Support - Support in preparation and moderation of regular Management Reviews, preparation of results, consulting on measure derivation

Phase 5: Optimization and Further Development - Regular evaluation of the review process, adaptation to changed requirements, continuous improvement of decision bases

"A successful Management Review process is characterized by the fact that it is perceived by leadership not as an additional burden but as a valuable management tool. The key lies in the right balance between detail depth and strategic overview, between risk transparency and action orientation. Properly implemented, the Management Review becomes the central element of a vibrant security culture and effective IT governance."
Sarah Richter

Sarah Richter

Head of Information Security, Cyber Security

Expertise & Experience:

10+ years of experience, CISA, CISM, Lead Auditor, DORA, NIS2, BCM, Cyber and Information Security

LinkedIn Profile

Our Services

We offer you tailored solutions for your digital transformation

Development of Management Review Frameworks

Customized design of structured review processes for leadership level that meet both regulatory requirements and provide practical added value for strategic management. We develop individually adapted review cycles, formats, and content optimally aligned with your organizational structure and IT security requirements.

  • Requirements analysis considering industry standards and compliance requirements
  • Definition of review rhythms, participant groups, and responsibilities
  • Development of standardized agendas and document templates
  • Integration into existing governance structures and meeting cycles

Review Dashboards and KPI Systems

Development of meaningful metric systems and visual dashboards that transparently display your IT security status and facilitate decisions at management level. Our KPI systems connect technical metrics with business-relevant indicators, creating a solid basis for informed decisions.

  • Identification and definition of relevant security and risk metrics
  • Development of multi-dimensional assessment systems for IT security risks
  • Design of intuitive dashboards with traffic light systems and trend analyses
  • Implementation of automated data collection and reporting processes

Moderation and Execution of Management Reviews

Professional preparation and moderation of your Management Review sessions by experienced IT security experts. We ensure efficient execution, goal-oriented discussions, and clear results that can be directly translated into action recommendations.

  • Structured preparation of review sessions and materials
  • Professional moderation with focus on decision-relevant topics
  • Professional contextualization of security incidents and trends
  • Documentation of results and derived measures

Management Reporting and Decision Templates

Creation of meaningful management reports and decision templates that present complex security topics in an understandable way and show clear action options. Our reports connect technical details with business implications, supporting informed decision-making.

  • Target audience-appropriate preparation of complex security topics
  • Development of standardized reporting formats for different management levels
  • Creation of decision-oriented business cases for security measures
  • Visualization of risk scenarios and their potential business impacts

Looking for a complete overview of all our services?

View Complete Service Overview

Our Areas of Expertise in Information Security

Discover our specialized areas of information security

Strategy

Development of comprehensive security strategies for your company

▼
    • Information Security Strategy
    • Cyber Security Strategy
    • Information Security Governance
    • Cyber Security Governance
    • Cyber Security Framework
    • Policy Framework
    • Security Measures
    • KPI Framework
    • Zero Trust Framework
IT Risk Management

Identification, assessment, and management of IT risks

▼
    • Cyber Risk
    • IT Risk Analysis
    • IT Risk Assessment
    • IT Risk Management Process
    • Control Catalog Development
    • Control Implementation
    • Measure Tracking
    • Effectiveness Testing
    • Audit
    • Management Review
    • Continuous Improvement
Enterprise GRC

Governance, risk, and compliance management at enterprise level

▼
    • GRC Strategy
    • Operating Model
    • Tool Implementation
    • Process Integration
    • Reporting Framework
    • Regulatory Change Management
Identity & Access Management (IAM)

Secure management of identities and access rights

▼
    • Identity & Access Management (IAM)
    • Access Governance
    • Privileged Access Management (PAM)
    • Multi-Faktor Authentifizierung (MFA)
    • Access Control
Security Architecture

Secure architecture concepts for your IT landscape

▼
    • Enterprise Security Architecture
    • Secure Software Development Life Cycle (SSDLC)
    • DevSecOps
    • API Security
    • Cloud Security
    • Network Security
Security Testing

Identification and remediation of security vulnerabilities

▼
    • Vulnerability Management
    • Penetration Testing
    • Security Assessment
    • Vulnerability Remediation
Security Operations (SecOps)

Operational security management for your company

▼
    • SIEM
    • Log Management
    • Threat Detection
    • Threat Analysis
    • Incident Management
    • Incident Response
    • IT Forensics
Data Protection & Encryption

Data protection and encryption solutions

▼
    • Data Classification
    • Encryption Management
    • PKI
    • Data Lifecycle Management
Security Awareness

Employee awareness and training

▼
    • Security Awareness Training
    • Phishing Training
    • Employee Training
    • Leadership Training
    • Culture Development
Business Continuity & Resilience

Ensuring business continuity and resilience

▼
    • BCM Framework
      • Business Impact Analysis
      • Recovery Strategy
      • Crisis Management
      • Emergency Response
      • Testing & Training
      • Create Emergency Documentation
      • Transition to Regular Operations
    • Resilience
      • Digital Resilience
      • Operational Resilience
      • Supply Chain Resilience
      • IT Service Continuity
      • Disaster Recovery
    • Outsourcing Management
      • Strategy
        • Outsourcing Policy
        • Governance Framework
        • Risk Management Integration
        • ESG Criteria
      • Contract Management
        • Contract Design
        • Service Level Agreements
        • Exit Strategy
      • Service Provider Selection
        • Due Diligence
        • Risk Analysis
        • Third Party Management
        • Supply Chain Assessment
      • Service Provider Management
        • Outsourcing Management Health Check

Frequently Asked Questions about Management Review

What is a Management Review and why is it important?

A Management Review in the context of IT security is a structured process in which the leadership level regularly reviews and evaluates the status, effectiveness, and strategic direction of information security management. This systematic review serves continuous improvement and ensures that security measures are aligned with business objectives and risks.

🔍 Core Elements of a Management Review:

• Regular review of information security management by leadership
• Assessment of the effectiveness of security measures and controls
• Review of the adequacy of available resources
• Analysis of security incidents and their resolution
• Evaluation of changes that could affect security management
• Identification of improvement potential

⚖ ️ Significance for Organizations:

• Demonstration of active leadership responsibility for information security
• Strategic management of security operations
• Early detection of deficiencies and risks
• Improvement of compliance with regulatory requirements
• Optimization of resource allocation for security measures

📑 Regulatory Requirements:

• Explicit requirement in standards such as ISO 27001 (Chapter 9.3)
• Component of frameworks like COBIT, ITIL, and BSI IT-Grundschutz
• Mandatory evidence for various compliance certifications
• Element of leadership responsibility in industry regulations (e.g., BAIT, KRITIS)
• Documentation obligation as part of accountability requirements

🔄 Integration into Corporate Governance:

• Incorporation into regular management cycles and meetings
• Coordination with other governance processes (risk management, compliance, audit)
• Basis for strategic IT security decisions
• Feedback loop between operational and strategic levels
• Catalyst for the development of security culture

How often should Management Reviews be conducted?

The optimal frequency for Management Reviews depends on various factors such as company size, industry, risk profile, and regulatory requirements. A well-thought-out rhythm is crucial for the effectiveness of the review process and should consider both compliance requirements and practical benefits.

⏱ ️ Typical Review Cycles:

• Quarterly: Most common approach for strategic Management Reviews
• Semi-annually: Common for more comprehensive, in-depth reviews
• Annually: Minimum requirement according to ISO 27001 and other standards
• Monthly: For operational reviews with limited scope
• Event-based: Additional reviews after significant incidents or changes

🏢 Factors Influencing Frequency:

• Organization size and complexity
• Industry-specific risks and compliance requirements
• Current threat landscape and security incidents
• Rate of change in the IT landscape
• Maturity of security management

🔄 Multi-tiered Review Approaches:

• Operational Reviews: More frequent (monthly/quarterly) focusing on tactical topics
• Strategic Reviews: Less frequent (semi-annually/annually) focusing on long-term direction
• Combined Approaches: Regular status updates with deeper periodic reviews
• Escalation-driven Reviews: Detail depth depending on identified issues
• Cascaded Reviews: Different levels of detail for different management levels

📋 Best Practices for Scheduling:

• Integration into existing management cycles and governance processes
• Coordination with other review processes (risk reviews, audit cycles, etc.)
• Consideration of budgeting and strategic planning cycles
• Flexible adjustment when business or risk conditions change
• Allow sufficient time for preparation, execution, and follow-up

What information should be considered in a Management Review?

A comprehensive Management Review should consider a variety of information to provide a complete picture of IT security status and enable informed decisions. The right selection and preparation of this information is crucial for the quality and benefit of the review.

🔍 Status Reports and Metrics:

• Progress on implementation of security measures and projects
• Security-relevant Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and their development
• Results of security audits and assessments
• Status of remediation of identified vulnerabilities
• Compliance status regarding internal and external requirements

⚠ ️ Risk and Incident Information:

• Current risk assessment and changes in risk profile
• Overview of security incidents and their handling
• Insights from incident analysis and derived measures
• Threat landscape and current external risks
• Status of risk mitigation measures

🔄 Changes with Security Relevance:

• Significant changes to IT systems or processes
• Organizational changes affecting security
• New or changed laws, regulations, or contractual obligations
• Changes in business requirements or corporate strategy
• Technological developments and their security implications

📈 Improvement Potential and Recommendations:

• Results from security exercises and tests
• Feedback from internal and external stakeholders
• Improvement suggestions from operational activities
• Benchmarking results and best practice comparisons
• Recommendations from previous reviews and their implementation status

💼 Resources and Budget Information:

• Availability and adequacy of resources for IT security
• Budget utilization and forecast for security measures
• Competencies and training needs of the security team
• Effectiveness and efficiency of security investments
• Cost-benefit ratio of various security measures

Who should participate in the Management Review?

The composition of participants in the Management Review is crucial for its effectiveness and should be carefully planned. The right combination of decision-makers and subject matter experts ensures both informed discussions and binding decisions.

👥 Core Participants from Leadership Functions:

• Executive management or board members with IT responsibility
• Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) or IT Security Officer
• CIO/IT Management as responsible for IT infrastructure
• Risk Management Officers or Chief Risk Officer
• Compliance Officers or Chief Compliance Officer

🔍 Subject Matter Experts for Content Depth:

• Leaders of operational security teams (e.g., SOC Manager)
• Responsible persons for specific security areas
• Data Protection Officers for data protection-relevant topics
• IT Auditors or internal auditors
• Business unit representatives for area-specific topics

⚙ ️ Additional Situational Participants:

• External consultants for specific issues
• Representatives of important business areas for cross-functional topics
• Project managers for major security initiatives
• Representatives of regulatory authorities (in certain industries)
• Specialists for emerging threats or technologies

💡 Recommendations for Participant Composition:

• Establish a core team with regular participants for continuity
• Flexible participation of additional experts depending on agenda
• Include hierarchy levels according to decision relevance
• Limit the size of the participant group to an effective level
• Define clear role distribution and responsibilities

📝 Roles in the Management Review Process:

• Chair/Moderation: Typically a senior member of executive management
• Reporter: CISO or IT Security Officer
• Minutes: Documentation of decisions and actions
• Decision-makers: Persons with authority to approve resources and measures
• Subject matter experts: Provide technical depth and context

How can the results of a Management Review be documented?

Structured and meaningful documentation of Management Review results is essential for tracking decisions, meeting compliance requirements, and continuously improving IT security management. The type of documentation should correspond to organizational requirements and the degree of formalization.

📝 Core Elements of Effective Documentation:

• Participant list with functions and roles
• Topics covered and agenda items
• Summary of discussions and key findings
• Decisions made with clear formulation
• Approved measures with responsibilities and timelines
• Resource commitments and budget decisions
• Open items for future reviews

📊 Formats and Structures for Review Reports:

• Formalized minutes for regulatory purposes
• Management dashboards with Key Performance Indicators
• Action tracking lists with status and responsibilities
• Executive summaries for leadership level
• Detailed appendices for subject-specific aspects

🔄 Integration into Existing Management Systems:

• Linking with the risk management system
• Integration into action management
• Connection with project/portfolio management tools
• Integration into GRC platforms (Governance, Risk, Compliance)
• Coordination with audit tracking systems

🔍 Distribution and Access to Review Results:

• Targeted distribution to relevant stakeholders
• Consideration of confidentiality of sensitive information
• Access control and authorization concepts
• Archiving for audit and compliance purposes
• Searchability for future reference

⚙ ️ Practical Implementation Tips:

• Standardized templates for consistent documentation
• Clear separation between facts, discussions, and decisions
• Timely creation and distribution of documentation
• Formal confirmation/approval by the review chair
• Regular review and update of documentation standards

Which KPIs and metrics are relevant for Management Reviews?

Meaningful Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and metrics form the basis for fact-based decisions in Management Reviews. The right selection and preparation of these metrics enables leadership to assess IT security status and make strategic decisions.

📊 Security-relevant Compliance Metrics:

• Degree of fulfillment of regulatory requirements in percent
• Number of open audit findings by criticality
• Average time to remediate compliance gaps
• Proportion of measures implemented on time from previous reviews
• Development of compliance status over different time periods

⚠ ️ Risk-oriented Metrics:

• Current risk inventory and changes from previous period
• Number and severity of identified risks
• Distribution of residual risks by acceptance, transfer, mitigation
• Progress in implementing risk mitigation measures
• Development of overall risk profile over time

🛡 ️ Operational Security Metrics:

• Number and criticality of security incidents
• Average detection and response times for incidents
• Patch management statistics (compliance, execution times)
• Results of vulnerability scans and penetration tests
• Status of security configurations of critical systems

👥 Employee and Training Metrics:

• Participation rates in security training
• Results of security awareness measures (e.g., phishing tests)
• Personnel resources for IT security (FTE, turnover, vacancies)
• Competency level and certifications in the security team
• Development of security awareness in the organization

💰 Economic and Resource Metrics:

• Budget for IT security (absolute and relative to IT budget)
• Cost per secured asset or employee
• ROI of security investments and measures
• Resource utilization in the security area
• Cost-benefit ratio of various security measures

How should a Management Review be prepared?

Thorough preparation is crucial for the success of a Management Review. It ensures that all relevant information is available, the right topics are discussed, and the available time is used efficiently. Preparation should include both content and organizational aspects.

📅 Organizational Preparation:

• Early scheduling with all relevant participants
• Setting an appropriate time frame (typically 2‑4 hours)
• Providing suitable facilities or virtual meeting platforms
• Planning breaks for longer reviews
• Clarifying technical requirements (presentation capabilities, etc.)

📝 Content Preparation:

• Creating a structured agenda with time allocations
• Prioritizing topics by relevance and urgency
• Defining expected outcomes for each agenda item
• Preparing decision templates for critical topics
• Compiling relevant metrics and status reports

👥 Participant Engagement:

• Advance distribution of agenda and relevant materials
• Clear communication of expectations to participants
• Identification of necessary preparation tasks for reporters
• Coordination with key persons on critical topics
• Soliciting feedback on agenda and possible additional topics

🧩 Preparation of Presentation Materials:

• Creating concise, meaningful presentation materials
• Visualization of complex relationships through graphics and diagrams
• Providing background information as appendix
• Focusing on decision-relevant information
• Uniform format for consistent presentation

🔄 Process-oriented Preparation:

• Review of open items and actions from previous reviews
• Verification of availability of current audit reports and assessments
• Review of important incidents and changes since last review
• Preparation of status updates on ongoing security initiatives
• Identification of topics requiring escalation or special attention

What role does the Management Review play in the context of ISO 27001?

The Management Review is a central element of the ISO 27001 standard and plays a crucial role in maintaining and continuously improving a certified Information Security Management System (ISMS). The standard defines specific requirements for the execution and documentation of these reviews.

📑 Formal Requirements according to ISO 27001:

• Explicit requirement in Chapter 9.3 of the standard
• Mandatory execution at planned intervals (at least annually)
• Execution by top management
• Consideration of defined input factors
• Documentation of results as evidence

📋 Required Input Factors according to Standard:

• Status of actions from previous Management Reviews
• Changes in external and internal issues relevant to the ISMS
• Feedback on information security performance (non-conformities, audit results, etc.)
• Feedback from interested parties (customers, regulatory authorities, etc.)
• Results of risk assessments and status of risk treatment plan
• Opportunities for continuous improvement

📈 Expected Outputs according to ISO 27001:

• Decisions on improvement opportunities
• Adjustments to the ISMS as needed
• Resource requirements and allocations
• Changes to processes for evaluating ISMS effectiveness
• Documented evidence of review results

🔄 Integration into the PDCA Cycle of the ISMS:

• Check Phase: Assessment of ISMS effectiveness
• Act Phase: Initiation of improvement measures
• Plan Phase: Input for adjusting objectives and strategies
• Do Phase: Allocation of resources for implementation

🔍 Relevance for Certification:

• Subject of examination in certification audits
• Evidence of leadership responsibility (Leadership, Chapter 5)
• Proof of ISMS effectiveness
• Evidence for the continuous improvement process
• Critical success factor for re-certifications

How can the effectiveness of Management Reviews be measured?

Measuring the effectiveness of Management Reviews is important to assess their value to the organization and continuously improve them. A systematic approach to evaluation helps optimize the process and maximize the added value for IT security.

📊 Measurable Outcome Indicators:

• Implementation rate of approved measures (in percent)
• Average time to implement review decisions
• Trend development of security metrics after review cycles
• Repetition rate of topics in consecutive reviews
• Reduction of security incidents after addressed risk areas

🛠 ️ Process-related Indicators:

• Adherence to planned review rhythm
• Participation rate of relevant decision-makers
• Completeness of topics covered according to requirements
• Quality and timeliness of provided information
• Meeting efficiency (ratio of discussion time to decision-making)

👥 Participant Feedback and Satisfaction:

• Assessment of relevance and benefit by participants
• Quality evaluation of decision bases
• Assessment of discussion effectiveness
• Satisfaction with follow-up on decisions
• Added value for own role and responsibility

🔄 Improvement Methods and Feedback Loops:

• Regular reflection on the review process within the review itself
• Establishment of a continuous improvement process for reviews
• Peer reviews or external evaluation of the review process
• Benchmarking against best practices of other organizations
• Integration of improvement suggestions into future reviews

💡 Practical Tips for Effectiveness Measurement:

• Differentiated evaluation of various review aspects instead of blanket assessment
• Combination of quantitative metrics and qualitative evaluations
• Documentation of lessons learned after each review cycle
• Setting target values for effectiveness indicators
• Regular adjustment of measurement criteria to changing requirements

How do Management Reviews differ across industries?

Management Reviews for IT security are designed and prioritized differently across industries, adapted to specific risk profiles, regulatory requirements, and business needs. These industry-specific differences should be considered when designing and conducting reviews.

🏦 Financial Services Sector:

• High degree of formalization with detailed documentation requirements
• Comprehensive regulatory requirements (MaRisk, BAIT, DORA, SOX)
• Focus on data protection, transaction security, and fraud prevention
• Involvement of regulatory authorities and external auditors
• More frequent reviews with multi-layered governance structures

🏥 Healthcare:

• Focus on patient data and critical infrastructure
• Consideration of medical-specific regulations (HIPAA, KBVA, etc.)
• Integration of data protection and clinical safety
• Balancing security measures with medical urgency
• Special attention to medical devices and connected equipment

🏭 Industry and Manufacturing:

• Focus on Operational Technology (OT) and IT-OT convergence
• Inclusion of production safety and downtime risks
• Assessment of security risks for industrial facilities
• Integration of security standards for SCADA systems
• Consideration of supply chains and production networks

🏛 ️ Public Sector:

• Alignment with national security standards and guidelines
• Higher transparency requirements and political aspects
• Special attention to critical infrastructure and public services
• Involvement of various authorities and jurisdictions
• Longer-term planning horizons and budget cycles

🛒 Retail and E-Commerce:

• Focus on customer data and payment security (PCI DSS)
• High dynamics in threats and technology changes
• Assessment of balance between security and user-friendliness
• Seasonal consideration of risks (e.g., peak season)
• Integration of omnichannel security aspects

How should Management Reviews be integrated with other governance processes?

Successful integration of Management Reviews with other governance processes is crucial for coherent and efficient IT security management. This coordination avoids duplication, closes gaps, and creates synergies between different control mechanisms.

🔄 Integration with Risk Management:

• Alignment of risk assessment methods and criteria
• Use of the risk register as a central information source
• Synchronization of risk assessment cycles and review dates
• Joint prioritization of risks and resource allocation
• Consistent escalation paths for critical risks

📊 Linkage with Performance Management:

• Derivation of IT security objectives from strategic business objectives
• Integration of security KPIs into Balanced Scorecards
• Alignment of performance evaluations and incentive systems
• Consistent measurement and reporting across different levels
• Common success metrics for security and business success

📝 Coordination with Compliance Management:

• Harmonization of compliance requirements across different regulations
• Consolidated assessment of compliance status
• Joint planning of assessment and audit activities
• Integrated tracking of compliance measures
• Unified reporting to regulatory authorities

💼 Alignment with Project Portfolio Management:

• Synchronization of security measures with project plans
• Integration of security requirements into project methodology
• Joint resource planning and allocation
• Coordination of release cycles and security reviews
• Consolidated status reporting

🔍 Synergy with Audit Management:

• Coordination of internal and external audit activities
• Shared use of audit results and recommendations
• Alignment of audit plans and Management Review cycles
• Avoidance of redundant audits and interviews
• Integrated tracking of audit findings and remediation

What challenges can arise in Management Reviews and how can they be solved?

Various challenges can arise during Management Reviews that may impair the effectiveness of the process. A proactive approach to these hurdles is crucial for the success and added value of the reviews.

⏱ ️ Time Pressure and Scheduling Issues:

• Challenge: Difficulty bringing all relevant decision-makers together at the same time
• Solution: Long-term planning with fixed dates in the corporate calendar
• Staggering of reviews at different management levels
• Prioritization of topics when time is limited
• Supplementary, focused short reviews for urgent topics

📊 Information Quality and Availability:

• Challenge: Incomplete, outdated, or overly complex information as decision basis
• Solution: Standardized report formats with clear requirements
• Early distribution of materials with lead time
• Introduction of a continuous monitoring system
• Training of reporters in concise presentation

🤔 Different Prioritization and Assessment:

• Challenge: Diverging risk assessments and priorities of different stakeholders
• Solution: Establishment of a unified risk assessment approach
• Promotion of open dialogue about different perspectives
• Structured decision-making processes with clear criteria
• Documentation of assumptions and rationale for decisions

🔄 Lack of Follow-up and Implementation:

• Challenge: Approved measures are not implemented or are delayed
• Solution: Define clear responsibilities and realistic timelines
• Establishment of systematic action management
• Regular status reports between reviews
• Escalation paths for delays or obstacles

🏢 Silo Thinking and Lack of Coordination:

• Challenge: Isolated consideration of security topics without business context
• Solution: Involvement of business units in reviews
• Cross-functional composition of review participants
• Business-oriented presentation of security topics
• Joint development of security strategies with business areas

How do you design a Management Review for virtual or decentralized teams?

The increasing prevalence of virtual and decentralized work models requires adapted approaches for Management Reviews. The challenges of physical separation can be overcome through appropriate methods, tools, and processes to ensure effective execution.

🌐 Technological Foundations for Virtual Reviews:

• Selection of a suitable video conferencing platform with stable connection
• Secure document sharing and collaborative tools
• Digital whiteboards for interactive discussions
• Mobile access options for participants on the go
• Recording functions for asynchronous participation

⏱ ️ Time Coordination and Format:

• Consideration of different time zones when scheduling
• Division of longer reviews into multiple shorter sessions
• Clear time structure with defined breaks
• Asynchronous preparation phases before the actual review
• Combination of synchronous and asynchronous elements

📝 Intensify Pre- and Post-work:

• More extensive advance distribution of materials with longer lead time
• Structured templates for uniform information provision
• Precise agenda with clear expectations for each participant
• Written summary and follow-up immediately after
• Multi-stage feedback process after the review

👥 Moderation Approaches for Virtual Settings:

• Active, goal-oriented moderation with stronger structuring
• Regular involvement of all participants through targeted addressing
• Use of polls and voting tools for decision-making
• Visualization of discussion progress and decisions
• Clear speaking portions and discussion rules

🔄 Special Success Factors for Decentralized Reviews:

• Building a trusting virtual communication culture
• Technical preparation sessions for less experienced participants
• Setting up a digital back channel for technical problems
• Special attention to non-verbal signals and engagement
• Regular check-ins to ensure understanding and participation

How should Management Reviews be adapted during crisis times?

During crisis times – whether due to cyber incidents, pandemics, or other disruptive events – Management Reviews must be adapted to account for changed priorities, risks, and operational realities. The ability to quickly adapt the review process is an important aspect of organizational resilience.

⚡ Adapt Frequency and Format:

• Increase review frequency with shorter, focused sessions
• Introduction of ad-hoc reviews for critical developments
• Streamlining the agenda to crisis-relevant topics
• Flexible participant groups depending on crisis scenario
• Shortened decision paths with clear escalation routes

🛡 ️ Prioritization in Crisis:

• Focus on immediately crisis-relevant security aspects
• Assessment of crisis impacts on security level
• Identification of new or intensified threats
• Prioritization of scarce resources for critical security measures
• Balancing emergency measures with long-term security goals

🔄 Accelerate Information Flow:

• Development of crisis dashboards with real-time information
• Establishment of direct communication channels to operational teams
• Simplified report formats for faster information processing
• Reduction of documentation requirements to essentials
• Integration of early warning indicators into review materials

👥 Crisis-specific Roles and Responsibilities:

• Involvement of crisis management team in reviews
• Clear responsibilities for crisis decisions
• Extension with external experts depending on crisis type
• Defined deputy arrangements for key persons
• Enhanced coordination with external stakeholders (authorities, partners)

🌱 Plan Transition to Normalization:

• Early identification of indicators for post-crisis phase
• Gradual return to regular review processes
• Systematic evaluation of crisis responses
• Integration of lessons learned into standard processes
• Adjustment of review processes based on crisis experiences

What tools and software can support Management Reviews?

The use of appropriate tools and software can make Management Reviews more efficient, structured, and valuable. The right selection and integration of these tools depends on the specific requirements and IT landscape of the organization.

📊 Dashboard and Reporting Tools:

• GRC platforms (Governance, Risk, Compliance) with management dashboards
• Business Intelligence tools for data analysis and visualization
• Specialized Security Metrics Dashboards
• KPI tracking systems with trend and comparison analyses
• Automated report generators with customizable templates

📝 Documentation and Collaboration:

• Document management systems with version control
• Collaborative editing platforms for joint work
• Wiki systems for knowledge management and documentation
• Digital whiteboards for visual collaboration
• Meeting management tools with integrated minutes functions

🔄 Action Tracking and Project Management:

• Task management systems for action tracking
• Project management tools with Gantt charts and dependencies
• Workflow automation for approval processes
• Reminder and escalation systems for deadlines
• Integrated resource planning tools

🛡 ️ Security-specific Tools:

• Vulnerability management platforms with risk assessment
• Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems
• Compliance management tools with regulatory frameworks
• Risk management software with risk matrices
• Security scoring and benchmarking tools

🔍 Decision Support Systems:

• Scenario analysis tools for different action options
• Prioritization matrices for investment decisions
• ROI calculators for security investments
• Cost-benefit analysis tools for security measures
• Risk simulation tools for complex scenarios

How do you handle confidential information in Management Reviews?

Management Reviews often contain highly sensitive information about security risks, vulnerabilities, and strategic decisions. Appropriate handling of this confidential data requires a thoughtful approach that balances information security with the need for effective decision-making.

🔒 Classification and Handling of Information:

• Defined confidentiality levels for review materials
• Clear labeling of sensitive documents and presentations
• Appropriate level of detail depending on audience and confidentiality
• Separation between strategic and technical details
• Abstraction of specific vulnerabilities to risk categories

👥 Participant Group and Access Rights:

• Need-to-know principle when selecting participants
• Confidentiality agreements for external participants
• Differentiated access rights to documents and information
• Logging of access to highly sensitive information
• Clear rules for further use and sharing of information

📱 Secure Communication and Documentation:

• Encrypted communication channels for advance information
• Secure meeting platforms for virtual reviews
• Controlled distribution of physical documents (numbered copies, etc.)
• Secure document storage with access controls
• Encrypted storage of electronic review documents

🗑 ️ Secure Disposal and Retention:

• Defined retention periods for sensitive review materials
• Secure destruction of no longer needed physical documents
• Controlled deletion of electronic working versions
• Audit-proof archiving of relevant decision documents
• Clearing of whiteboards and other temporary media

⚖ ️ Compliance and Legal Aspects:

• Consideration of data protection requirements
• Compliance with industry-specific compliance requirements
• Documentation of confidentiality measures taken
• Balancing between transparency and information protection
• Regular review of confidentiality practices

How can a Management Review promote security culture in the company?

An effective Management Review process can contribute significantly to the development and strengthening of security culture in an organization, far beyond its direct governance functions. As a visible leadership instrument, it sets important signals and creates framework conditions for a positive security culture.

👥 Role Model Function of Leadership:

• Demonstration of leadership commitment to IT security
• Visible prioritization of security topics at the highest level
• Personal engagement of executives in security matters
• Consistent consideration of security aspects in decisions
• Active inquiry about security status and developments

🔄 Promotion of Transparency and Open Communication:

• Establishment of a culture where security concerns can be openly expressed
• Appreciative handling of reported security risks and incidents
• Destigmatization of security problems and vulnerabilities
• Regular communication of security status in the organization
• Transparent presentation of security decisions and their reasons

🎯 Anchoring Security as a Common Goal:

• Integration of security objectives into corporate and departmental goals
• Consideration of security performance in evaluation systems
• Recognition of special contributions to security improvement
• Promotion of personal responsibility of all employees for security
• Development of a common security understanding across hierarchies

📚 Continuous Learning and Improvement:

• Use of reviews for organizational learning from incidents
• Promotion of a blame-free culture in analyzing security incidents
• Systematic capture and sharing of lessons learned
• Integration of external best practices and new insights
• Adaptability to changed threat situations and framework conditions

🌱 Sustainable Culture Development:

• Long-term perspective in security culture development
• Consistent reinforcement of security values and behaviors
• Integration of security aspects into onboarding and training
• Regular measurement of security culture maturity
• Celebration of security successes and milestones

What development stages does a Management Review process typically go through?

Management Review processes evolve over time and go through various maturity stages characterized by increasing effectiveness, integration, and value contribution. Understanding these development stages helps organizations assess their current status and pursue targeted improvements.

🌱 Stage 1: Reactive Compliance Orientation:

• Reviews primarily as a response to external requirements
• Focus on formal fulfillment of regulatory requirements
• Irregular, often event-driven execution
• Limited participation and engagement of leadership
• Minimal documentation and follow-up

🔄 Stage 2: Process-oriented Formalization:

• Establishment of a structured, regular review process
• Standardized agendas and report formats
• Defined roles and responsibilities
• Systematic documentation and action tracking
• Integration into existing management cycles

📊 Stage 3: Data-driven Decision Making:

• Development of meaningful security metrics and KPIs
• Trend analyses and comparisons over time periods
• Fact-based prioritization of measures
• Quantitative assessment of risks and measure effectiveness
• Benchmark comparisons with industry standards

🔍 Stage 4: Strategic Alignment and Integration:

• Close linkage with corporate objectives and strategy
• Holistic consideration of security aspects
• Proactive identification of strategic security topics
• Integration with other governance processes
• Long-term planning and roadmap development

💡 Stage 5: Innovation-oriented Value Creation:

• Reviews as drivers for security innovation
• Use of agile and adaptive review approaches
• Continuous improvement of the review process itself
• Security as competitive advantage and value driver
• Culture-building effect beyond IT security

🔄 Development Factors for Maturity Progress:

• Leadership engagement and commitment
• Availability of quality data and metrics
• Integration with business processes
• Continuous learning and adaptation
• Investment in tools and capabilities

How can small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) implement Management Reviews efficiently?

For small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), structured Management Reviews of IT security are also valuable but must be adapted to specific resources, structures, and needs. With a pragmatic, focused approach, SMEs can establish effective reviews with appropriate effort.

🔍 Adapted Scope and Focus:

• Concentration on business-critical systems and highest risks
• Combined reviews for various governance topics
• Reduction of complexity through clear prioritization
• Focus on practically implementable measures
• Flexible adjustment of depth depending on topic relevance

👥 Leverage Lean Organizational Structure:

• Direct involvement of management without hierarchy levels
• Combination of roles (e.g., IT manager and security officer)
• Integration into existing management meetings
• Involvement of key persons with multiple areas of responsibility
• Short decision paths for quick implementation

📝 Pragmatic Documentation and Tools:

• Use of simple, pre-made templates and checklists
• Lean documentation with focus on decisions and actions
• Use of cost-effective or open-source tools
• Cloud-based solutions with low implementation effort
• Combination of review documentation with other governance requirements

🤝 Use External Support Strategically:

• Targeted consulting for complex security topics
• Use of external expertise for specific assessments
• Involvement of IT service providers in the review process
• Joint reviews with similar companies or partners
• Exchange in industry networks and associations

⏱ ️ Time-saving Execution Formats:

• Shorter, focused review meetings (60‑90 minutes)
• Advance distribution and review of information
• Combination of formal reviews with informal check-ins
• Rotating deep analysis of different topic areas
• Annual planning with topic focuses per quarter

What trends are shaping the future of Management Reviews?

Management Reviews of IT security are continuously evolving, influenced by technological innovations, changing threat landscapes, and new governance approaches. Knowledge of current trends helps organizations design their review processes in a future-oriented manner and benefit from new developments.

🤖 Automation and AI Support:

• Automated data collection and preparation for reviews
• AI-supported analysis of security data and anomaly detection
• Predictive analytics for forecasting security trends
• Automated generation of dashboards and reports
• Intelligent prioritization of topics and measures

🔄 Agile and Continuous Review Approaches:

• Merging of periodic reviews with continuous monitoring
• Integration into agile governance frameworks
• Flexible, event-based review cycles instead of rigid schedules
• DevSecOps integration with automated security feedback loops
• Adaptive review processes with dynamic depth and frequency

🌐 Extended Stakeholder Involvement:

• Stronger integration of business perspectives and stakeholders
• Extended involvement of customers and suppliers in review processes
• Community-based approaches for threat analyses
• Collaborative, cross-organizational reviews in ecosystems
• Crowdsourcing of security assessments and inputs

🔍 More Holistic Risk Perspectives:

• Integration of cyber and physical security aspects
• Consideration of ESG factors (Environmental, Social, Governance)
• Extended consideration of supply chain and third-party risks
• Stronger focus on business resilience and continuity
• Assessment of ethical aspects of security decisions

📱 New Technologies and Threat Areas:

• Focus on cloud security and multi-cloud governance
• Assessment of quantum computing readiness
• Management of IoT and connected device security
• Evaluation of AI and machine learning security risks
• Consideration of emerging technologies and their implications

Success Stories

Discover how we support companies in their digital transformation

Generative KI in der Fertigung

Bosch

KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz

Fallstudie
BOSCH KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz

Ergebnisse

Reduzierung der Implementierungszeit von AI-Anwendungen auf wenige Wochen
Verbesserung der Produktqualität durch frühzeitige Fehlererkennung
Steigerung der Effizienz in der Fertigung durch reduzierte Downtime

AI Automatisierung in der Produktion

Festo

Intelligente Vernetzung für zukunftsfähige Produktionssysteme

Fallstudie
FESTO AI Case Study

Ergebnisse

Verbesserung der Produktionsgeschwindigkeit und Flexibilität
Reduzierung der Herstellungskosten durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung
Erhöhung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch personalisierte Produkte

KI-gestützte Fertigungsoptimierung

Siemens

Smarte Fertigungslösungen für maximale Wertschöpfung

Fallstudie
Case study image for KI-gestützte Fertigungsoptimierung

Ergebnisse

Erhebliche Steigerung der Produktionsleistung
Reduzierung von Downtime und Produktionskosten
Verbesserung der Nachhaltigkeit durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung

Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel

Klöckner & Co

Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel

Fallstudie
Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel - Klöckner & Co

Ergebnisse

Über 2 Milliarden Euro Umsatz jährlich über digitale Kanäle
Ziel, bis 2022 60% des Umsatzes online zu erzielen
Verbesserung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch automatisierte Prozesse

Let's

Work Together!

Is your organization ready for the next step into the digital future? Contact us for a personal consultation.

Your strategic success starts here

Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management

Ready for the next step?

Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now

30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available

For optimal preparation of your strategy session:

Your strategic goals and challenges
Desired business outcomes and ROI expectations
Current compliance and risk situation
Stakeholders and decision-makers in the project

Prefer direct contact?

Direct hotline for decision-makers

Strategic inquiries via email

Detailed Project Inquiry

For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance

Latest Insights on Management Review

Discover our latest articles, expert knowledge and practical guides about Management Review

DORA 2026: Warum 44% der Finanzunternehmen nicht compliant sind — und was jetzt zu tun ist

February 23, 2026
15 Min.

44% der Finanzunternehmen kämpfen mit der DORA-Umsetzung. Erfahren Sie, wo die größten Lücken liegen und welche Maßnahmen jetzt Priorität haben.

Boris Friedrich
Read

DORA 2026: Warum 44% der Finanzunternehmen nicht compliant sind — und was jetzt zu tun ist

February 23, 2026
15 Min.

44% der Finanzunternehmen kämpfen mit der DORA-Umsetzung. Erfahren Sie, wo die größten Lücken liegen und welche Maßnahmen jetzt Priorität haben.

Boris Friedrich
Read
Regulierungswelle 2026: NIS2, DORA, AI Act & CRA — Was Unternehmen jetzt tun müssen
Informationssicherheit

Regulierungswelle 2026: NIS2, DORA, AI Act & CRA — Was Unternehmen jetzt tun müssen

February 23, 2026
20 Min.

NIS2, DORA, AI Act und CRA treffen 2026 gleichzeitig. Fristen, Überschneidungen und konkrete Maßnahmen — der komplette Leitfaden für Entscheider.

Boris Friedrich
Read
Regulierungswelle 2026: NIS2, DORA, AI Act & CRA — Was Unternehmen jetzt tun müssen
Informationssicherheit

Regulierungswelle 2026: NIS2, DORA, AI Act & CRA — Was Unternehmen jetzt tun müssen

February 23, 2026
20 Min.

NIS2, DORA, AI Act und CRA treffen 2026 gleichzeitig. Fristen, Überschneidungen und konkrete Maßnahmen — der komplette Leitfaden für Entscheider.

Boris Friedrich
Read

NIS2-Frist verpasst? Diese Bußgelder und Haftungsrisiken drohen ab März 2026

February 21, 2026
6 Min.

29.000 Unternehmen müssen sich bis 6. März 2026 beim BSI registrieren. Was bei Versäumnis droht: Bußgelder bis 10 Mio. €, persönliche Geschäftsführer-Haftung und BSI-Aufsichtsmaßnahmen.

Boris Friedrich
Read

NIS2 trifft KI: Warum AI Governance jetzt Pflicht wird

February 21, 2026
7 Min.

NIS2 fordert Risikomanagement für alle ICT-Systeme — inklusive KI. Ab August 2026 kommen die Hochrisiko-Pflichten des EU AI Act dazu. Warum Unternehmen AI Governance jetzt in ihre NIS2-Compliance einbauen müssen.

Boris Friedrich
Read
View All Articles
ADVISORI Logo
BlogCase StudiesAbout Us
info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01