Develop a customized GRC-Operating-Model that defines optimal organizational structures, clear responsibilities, and efficient processes for your governance, risk, and compliance management. We support you in the design, optimization, and implementation of an integrated GRC-Operating-Model that strengthens the effectiveness of your GRC management while ensuring operational efficiency.
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
Or contact us directly:










The greatest challenge in developing a GRC-Operating-Model lies in the balance between standardization and flexibility. While a uniform approach ensures efficiency and consistency, different business units often require customized solutions. Therefore, when developing your Operating Model, consider both the need for overarching standards and the specific requirements of individual business units or regions.
Years of Experience
Employees
Projects
Our methodology for developing and optimizing GRC-Operating-Models is based on a proven, structured approach that ensures your Operating Model is perfectly aligned with your business requirements, corporate culture, and regulatory obligations. We work closely with your management team and your GRC functions to develop a deep understanding of your requirements and translate them into an effective and efficient Operating Model.
Phase 1: Analysis and Assessment - Conducting a comprehensive inventory of existing GRC structures and processes, identification of strengths, weaknesses, and improvement potential, analysis of regulatory requirements and industry standards, assessment of effectiveness and efficiency of current Operating Model, identification of pain points and stakeholder requirements
Phase 2: Target Operating Model Design - Definition of design principles for the Operating Model, development of optimal governance structure and committee landscape, detailing of roles and responsibilities (RACI), design of efficient GRC processes and workflows, alignment with other strategic initiatives and organizational structures
Phase 3: Gap Analysis and Transformation Roadmap - Identification of gaps between current state and target Operating Model, prioritization of measures based on benefit and feasibility, development of detailed implementation roadmap, resource planning and budget estimation, definition of quick wins and long-term initiatives
Phase 4: Implementation Planning and Support - Detailed planning of implementation steps, support in developing new role and job descriptions, design of transition processes and structures, development of communication and change management plans, definition of success criteria and KPIs
Phase 5: Monitoring and Continuous Improvement - Establishment of mechanisms to monitor Operating Model effectiveness, development of KPIs and reporting structures, building feedback mechanisms for continuous improvement, regular reviews and adjustments, establishment of continuous optimization process
"An effective GRC-Operating-Model is far more than an organizational chart or a role matrix. It defines how GRC decisions are made, how information flows, and how people work together. The key lies in developing an Operating Model that not only meets regulatory requirements but also culturally fits the company and is operationally practicable. We often see the greatest challenges at the interfaces – between different GRC functions on one hand and between GRC and the business on the other. Here it is worth taking special care in defining clear processes and responsibilities."

Head of Information Security, Cyber Security
Expertise & Experience:
10+ years of experience, CISA, CISM, Lead Auditor, DORA, NIS2, BCM, Cyber and Information Security
We offer you tailored solutions for your digital transformation
We support you in developing an optimal organizational structure for your GRC functions that meets both regulatory requirements and is economically efficient. We consider your company's specific requirements and develop a customized solution that fits your corporate culture and structure.
We help you develop effective governance structures for your GRC management that define clear decision processes and responsibilities. Our approach includes designing an optimal committee landscape, establishing decision-making authorities, and defining control mechanisms for your GRC management.
We support you in the detailed definition of roles and responsibilities in the GRC area to create clarity about tasks, authorities, and responsibilities. With our help, you develop a transparent and practicable role model that avoids duplication and defines clear responsibilities.
We help you design efficient and effective GRC processes and optimally integrate them into your existing business processes. Our approach aims to minimize friction, avoid duplication, and increase acceptance of GRC measures in the business.
We conduct a comprehensive analysis of your existing GRC-Operating-Model, identify strengths and weaknesses, and develop concrete recommendations for optimization. Our assessment includes both organizational aspects as well as processes, governance structures, and interfaces to other functions.
We support you in the successful implementation of your new or optimized GRC-Operating-Model. From detailed implementation planning through change management to employee training, we accompany you in all phases of implementation and ensure that your new Operating Model is successfully put into practice.
Looking for a complete overview of all our services?
View Complete Service OverviewDiscover our specialized areas of information security
An effective GRC-Operating-Model consists of several core elements that together form a coherent framework for the organizational design and management of governance, risk, and compliance management. These elements enable effective and efficient implementation of the GRC strategy in the organization.
The Three-Lines-of-Defense model is an established framework for structuring governance, risk, and compliance responsibilities in organizations. Successful implementation of this model requires clear definition of the roles and responsibilities of each line of defense as well as effective interfaces between them.
The decision between centralized, decentralized, or hybrid GRC structures is of great strategic importance and has far-reaching effects on the effectiveness and efficiency of GRC management. Each approach brings specific advantages and disadvantages that must be carefully weighed.
GRC committees play a central role in a company's governance structure and are crucial for effective management of governance, risk, and compliance topics. The optimal structuring of these committees depends on various factors and should be adapted to the specific requirements and circumstances of the company.
A RACI matrix (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) is a powerful tool for clarifying roles and responsibilities in GRC processes. Developing an effective RACI matrix requires a structured approach and involvement of all relevant stakeholders to create clarity and promote efficiency.
Successfully implementing a GRC-Operating-Model is a complex undertaking that goes beyond purely conceptual development. A series of success factors determines whether the Operating Model achieves the desired effects in practice and is sustainably anchored in the organization.
Integrating GRC processes into a company's business processes is crucial for the effectiveness and efficiency of GRC management. Successful integration minimizes additional effort, increases acceptance, and ensures that GRC aspects are considered early in business decisions.
The qualification and competency of GRC employees is a decisive success factor for an effective GRC-Operating-Model. In a rapidly changing regulatory and business environment, GRC professionals must possess a broad spectrum of expertise, methodological skills, and soft skills that should be continuously developed.
Designing effective interfaces between different GRC functions is crucial for integrated GRC management. Well-designed interfaces enable efficient information exchange, reduce duplication, and ensure a consistent approach to GRC topics across functions.
Measuring the effectiveness of a GRC-Operating-Model requires a thoughtful mix of quantitative and qualitative metrics. Well-designed KPIs help evaluate the success of the Operating Model, identify improvement potential, and demonstrate value contribution to the company.
Designing an international GRC-Operating-Model presents special requirements as it must consider local regulatory peculiarities, cultural differences, and different business models. An effective international model creates the right balance between global standardization and local flexibility.
Communication when introducing a new GRC-Operating-Model is a critical success factor for acceptance and sustainable anchoring in the organization. A well-thought-out communication strategy should specifically address different stakeholder groups and clearly convey the benefits of the new model.
Designing a GRC-Operating-Model for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) requires a special approach that considers limited resources and flatter structures. An effective GRC-Operating-Model for SMEs must be practice-oriented, scalable, and closely connected to the core business.
Business units (Business Lines) play a central role in the GRC-Operating-Model as the first line of defense and main responsible parties for operational implementation of GRC requirements in daily operations. An effective GRC-Operating-Model must appropriately involve business units and promote their active participation.
The qualification and competency of GRC employees is a decisive success factor for an effective GRC-Operating-Model. In a rapidly changing regulatory and business environment, GRC professionals must possess a broad spectrum of expertise, methodological skills, and soft skills that should be continuously developed.
Designing effective interfaces between different GRC functions is crucial for integrated GRC management. Well-designed interfaces enable efficient information exchange, reduce duplication, and ensure a consistent approach to GRC topics across functions.
Measuring the effectiveness of a GRC-Operating-Model requires a thoughtful mix of quantitative and qualitative metrics. Well-designed KPIs help evaluate the success of the Operating Model, identify improvement potential, and demonstrate value contribution to the company.
Designing an international GRC-Operating-Model presents special requirements as it must consider local regulatory peculiarities, cultural differences, and different business models. An effective international model creates the right balance between global standardization and local flexibility.
Communication when introducing a new GRC-Operating-Model is a critical success factor for acceptance and sustainable anchoring in the organization. A well-thought-out communication strategy should specifically address different stakeholder groups and clearly convey the benefits of the new model.
Designing a GRC-Operating-Model for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) requires a special approach that considers limited resources and flatter structures. An effective GRC-Operating-Model for SMEs must be practice-oriented, scalable, and closely connected to the core business.
Business units (Business Lines) play a central role in the GRC-Operating-Model as the first line of defense and main responsible parties for operational implementation of GRC requirements in daily operations. An effective GRC-Operating-Model must appropriately involve business units and promote their active participation.
The qualification and competency of GRC employees is a decisive success factor for an effective GRC-Operating-Model. In a rapidly changing regulatory and business environment, GRC professionals must possess a broad spectrum of expertise, methodological skills, and soft skills that should be continuously developed.
Designing effective interfaces between different GRC functions is crucial for integrated GRC management. Well-designed interfaces enable efficient information exchange, reduce duplication, and ensure a consistent approach to GRC topics across functions.
Measuring the effectiveness of a GRC-Operating-Model requires a thoughtful mix of quantitative and qualitative metrics. Well-designed KPIs help evaluate the success of the Operating Model, identify improvement potential, and demonstrate value contribution to the company.
Designing an international GRC-Operating-Model presents special requirements as it must consider local regulatory peculiarities, cultural differences, and different business models. An effective international model creates the right balance between global standardization and local flexibility.
Communication when introducing a new GRC-Operating-Model is a critical success factor for acceptance and sustainable anchoring in the organization. A well-thought-out communication strategy should specifically address different stakeholder groups and clearly convey the benefits of the new model.
Designing a GRC-Operating-Model for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) requires a special approach that considers limited resources and flatter structures. An effective GRC-Operating-Model for SMEs must be practice-oriented, scalable, and closely connected to the core business.
Business units (Business Lines) play a central role in the GRC-Operating-Model as the first line of defense and main responsible parties for operational implementation of GRC requirements in daily operations. An effective GRC-Operating-Model must appropriately involve business units and promote their active participation.
The qualification and competency of GRC employees is a decisive success factor for an effective GRC-Operating-Model. In a rapidly changing regulatory and business environment, GRC professionals must possess a broad spectrum of expertise, methodological skills, and soft skills that should be continuously developed.
Designing effective interfaces between different GRC functions is crucial for integrated GRC management. Well-designed interfaces enable efficient information exchange, reduce duplication, and ensure a consistent approach to GRC topics across functions.
Measuring the effectiveness of a GRC-Operating-Model requires a thoughtful mix of quantitative and qualitative metrics. Well-designed KPIs help evaluate the success of the Operating Model, identify improvement potential, and demonstrate value contribution to the company.
Designing an international GRC-Operating-Model presents special requirements as it must consider local regulatory peculiarities, cultural differences, and different business models. An effective international model creates the right balance between global standardization and local flexibility.
Communication when introducing a new GRC-Operating-Model is a critical success factor for acceptance and sustainable anchoring in the organization. A well-thought-out communication strategy should specifically address different stakeholder groups and clearly convey the benefits of the new model.
Designing a GRC-Operating-Model for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) requires a special approach that considers limited resources and flatter structures. An effective GRC-Operating-Model for SMEs must be practice-oriented, scalable, and closely connected to the core business.
Business units (Business Lines) play a central role in the GRC-Operating-Model as the first line of defense and main responsible parties for operational implementation of GRC requirements in daily operations. An effective GRC-Operating-Model must appropriately involve business units and promote their active participation.
Technology plays an increasingly important role in optimizing GRC-Operating-Models. The targeted use of GRC tools and platforms can increase efficiency, improve data quality, enhance transparency, and enable better integration of GRC into business processes.
Conflicts between different GRC functions can impair the effectiveness of overall GRC management and lead to inefficiencies. A well-designed GRC-Operating-Model should contain mechanisms to prevent such conflicts or resolve them constructively.
The development of GRC-Operating-Models is subject to continuous change, shaped by technological innovations, regulatory changes, and organizational trends. Forward-thinking companies should incorporate these developments into their strategic considerations early on.
Adapting the GRC-Operating-Model to agile corporate structures requires a rethinking in the organization and design of governance, risk, and compliance functions. Traditional, hierarchical GRC approaches must be designed more flexibly and integrated to keep pace with the speed and dynamics of agile organizations.
Measuring the success of a GRC-Operating-Model transformation requires a structured approach with clearly defined metrics and success criteria. A comprehensive success measurement should consider both quantitative and qualitative dimensions and include the various perspectives of stakeholders.
Modern GRC-Operating-Models differ fundamentally from traditional approaches. They respond to the changed requirements of a dynamic business environment and use new technologies and organizational concepts to make GRC more effective and efficient.
Technology plays an increasingly important role in optimizing GRC-Operating-Models. The targeted use of GRC tools and platforms can increase efficiency, improve data quality, enhance transparency, and enable better integration of GRC into business processes.
Conflicts between different GRC functions can impair the effectiveness of overall GRC management and lead to inefficiencies. A well-designed GRC-Operating-Model should contain mechanisms to prevent such conflicts or resolve them constructively.
The development of GRC-Operating-Models is subject to continuous change, shaped by technological innovations, regulatory changes, and organizational trends. Forward-thinking companies should incorporate these developments into their strategic considerations early on.
Adapting the GRC-Operating-Model to agile corporate structures requires a rethinking in the organization and design of governance, risk, and compliance functions. Traditional, hierarchical GRC approaches must be designed more flexibly and integrated to keep pace with the speed and dynamics of agile organizations.
Measuring the success of a GRC-Operating-Model transformation requires a structured approach with clearly defined metrics and success criteria. A comprehensive success measurement should consider both quantitative and qualitative dimensions and include the various perspectives of stakeholders.
Modern GRC-Operating-Models differ fundamentally from traditional approaches. They respond to the changed requirements of a dynamic business environment and use new technologies and organizational concepts to make GRC more effective and efficient.
Discover how we support companies in their digital transformation
Bosch
KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz

Festo
Intelligente Vernetzung für zukunftsfähige Produktionssysteme

Siemens
Smarte Fertigungslösungen für maximale Wertschöpfung

Klöckner & Co
Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel

Is your organization ready for the next step into the digital future? Contact us for a personal consultation.
Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
Direct hotline for decision-makers
Strategic inquiries via email
For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance
Discover our latest articles, expert knowledge and practical guides about GRC-Operating-Model
44% der Finanzunternehmen kämpfen mit der DORA-Umsetzung. Erfahren Sie, wo die größten Lücken liegen und welche Maßnahmen jetzt Priorität haben.
44% der Finanzunternehmen kämpfen mit der DORA-Umsetzung. Erfahren Sie, wo die größten Lücken liegen und welche Maßnahmen jetzt Priorität haben.

NIS2, DORA, AI Act und CRA treffen 2026 gleichzeitig. Fristen, Überschneidungen und konkrete Maßnahmen — der komplette Leitfaden für Entscheider.

NIS2, DORA, AI Act und CRA treffen 2026 gleichzeitig. Fristen, Überschneidungen und konkrete Maßnahmen — der komplette Leitfaden für Entscheider.
29.000 Unternehmen müssen sich bis 6. März 2026 beim BSI registrieren. Was bei Versäumnis droht: Bußgelder bis 10 Mio. €, persönliche Geschäftsführer-Haftung und BSI-Aufsichtsmaßnahmen.
NIS2 fordert Risikomanagement für alle ICT-Systeme — inklusive KI. Ab August 2026 kommen die Hochrisiko-Pflichten des EU AI Act dazu. Warum Unternehmen AI Governance jetzt in ihre NIS2-Compliance einbauen müssen.