Performance and evidence
We define how agreed services are assessed using traceable data.
- Clarify service scope and measurement rules
- Map reports and evidence
- Flag missing or conflicting data
- Deliver an agreed review package
Definitions, implementation and traceable results
We establish traceable oversight for existing provider relationships.
The focus is the ongoing relationship after appointment: what was delivered, which evidence is missing, and when does a deviation need a decision? We connect business accountability with documented review, escalation and change routes.
We establish traceable oversight for existing provider relationships. Performance data, evidence, deviations and actions are connected to owners and tested in an agreed review process.
3 service modules
Bookable individually or as an end-to-end programme.
We define how agreed services are assessed using traceable data.
We connect anomalies to ownership, deadlines and traceable decisions.
We embed reviews and changes in existing workflows.
5 phases
We inventory contracts, performance criteria, existing reports and open cases. These define an oversight model with measurement rules, review dates and action tracking. Representative deviations are exercised through decision and retesting.

Your contact
Sarah Richter
Head of Information Security, Cyber Security
10+ years of experience, CISA, CISM, Lead Auditor, DORA, NIS2, BCM, Cyber and Information Security
Successful vendor management means more than just SLA monitoring. It is about striking the balance between control and partnership in order to jointly create value and minimize risks.
A provider report or certificate is informative only within its actual scope. Check coverage, period, exceptions and the tasks retained by your organisation.
7 QUESTIONS, BRIEFLY ANSWERED
A concrete workflow for performance assessment, evidence, reviews and actions. Handover includes owners and tested examples; the engagement is not limited to another reporting dashboard.
We map requirements to the specific organisation and service and record unresolved applicability questions. A rigid dual-framework model is not presented as a universal requirement; necessary controls follow the actual scope.
Each metric receives a service link, measurement rule, source and owner. We establish which decision follows a deviation. A favourable average must not hide significant individual failures.
Selection assesses a provider before appointment or significant change. Oversight examines actual delivery and risk during the relationship; findings may trigger a new selection or switching decision.
We examine service coverage, period, exceptions and complementary requirements for your organisation. Evidence is mapped to the relationship; its title alone confirms neither all controls nor every contractual service.
Findings receive assessment, owners and testable completion criteria. We distinguish planned actions, implemented changes and confirmed effectiveness. A promised correction is not recorded as a resolved finding.
They receive review materials, escalation routes, an action register and change instructions. Representative cases are practised together, with remaining data and evidence gaps visible at handover.










Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now
30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
Direct hotline for decision-makers
Strategic inquiries via email
For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance