Assessment planning and records
We define a traceable engagement with appropriate evidence.
- Record criteria and time period
- Inventory documents and responsibilities
- Agree samples and boundaries
- Deliver a plan with unresolved access needs
Definitions, implementation and traceable results
We assess an agreed part of your outsourcing management against documented criteria.
The engagement provides an assessment bounded by scope and time. We examine whether selected requirements, responsibilities and evidence align within the reviewed area. A positive sample result is not blanket approval of the whole outsourcing estate.
3 service modules
We define a traceable engagement with appropriate evidence.
We connect requirements to available evidence and selected cases.
We provide a justified basis for improvement decisions.
5 phases
We start by defining scope, criteria, available records and contacts. Selected relationships and control workflows are then examined. The report separates confirmed findings, open questions and untested areas and describes possible follow-up actions.

Your contact
Sarah Richter
Head of Information Security, Cyber Security
10+ years of experience, CISA, CISM, Lead Auditor, DORA, NIS2, BCM, Cyber and Information Security
A systematic health check of outsourcing management provides not only compliance assurance, but also creates the foundation for sustainable optimization of your service provider relationships — and thus genuine added value for your organization.
7 QUESTIONS, BRIEFLY ANSWERED
It examines agreed requirements, roles, controls and evidence in selected relationships. Data dates, samples and limitations are documented, while untested areas remain explicitly open.
Criteria are agreed with your specialists for the specific scope. Applicable requirements receive traceable evidence or findings. The health check is not offered as complete confirmation of DORA, EBA or MaRisk conformity.
Not automatically. The engagement, role, criteria and intended conclusion are agreed beforehand. A formal audit or certification statement needs its own defined framework and does not follow from the health-check label.
Each finding is linked to criteria, examined cases and available evidence. Hypotheses are separated from confirmed deviations; generic lists of common problems are not findings about your organisation.
Relationships, assessment depth, records and available contacts determine effort. Timing and dependencies are documented after scoping; missing evidence must not silently be treated as satisfied.
Triggers can include a planned change, an open finding or uncertainty about existing controls. Scope follows the concrete question and complements ongoing oversight rather than replacing it.
Actions are planned with owners and testable criteria. Implementation and retesting can follow; only their results establish whether a finding has been resolved. The report alone does not create that outcome.










Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management
Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now
Book Strategy Session30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available
Direct hotline for decision-makers
Strategic inquiries via email
For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance