1. Home/
  2. Services/
  3. Regulatory Compliance Management/
  4. Bcbs 239/
  5. Bcbs 239 Readiness En

Newsletter abonnieren

Bleiben Sie auf dem Laufenden mit den neuesten Trends und Entwicklungen

Durch Abonnieren stimmen Sie unseren Datenschutzbestimmungen zu.

A
ADVISORI FTC GmbH

Transformation. Innovation. Sicherheit.

Firmenadresse

Kaiserstraße 44

60329 Frankfurt am Main

Deutschland

Auf Karte ansehen

Kontakt

info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01

Mo-Fr: 9:00 - 18:00 Uhr

Unternehmen

Leistungen

Social Media

Folgen Sie uns und bleiben Sie auf dem neuesten Stand.

  • /
  • /

© 2024 ADVISORI FTC GmbH. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Your browser does not support the video tag.
Comprehensive preparation for BCBS-239 compliance

BCBS-239 Readiness

Our BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment provides a comprehensive evaluation of your readiness for BCBS-239 compliance. We identify gaps, develop tailored roadmaps, and support you in the successful implementation of all required measures.

  • ✓Clear transparency on your current compliance status
  • ✓Structured roadmap for BCBS-239 implementation
  • ✓Optimization of risk data governance and processes
  • ✓Cost savings through early identification of critical areas of action

Your strategic success starts here

Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management

30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available

For optimal preparation of your strategy session:

  • Your strategic goals and objectives
  • Desired business outcomes and ROI
  • Steps already taken

Or contact us directly:

info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01

Certifications, Partners and more...

ISO 9001 CertifiedISO 27001 CertifiedISO 14001 CertifiedBeyondTrust PartnerBVMW Bundesverband MitgliedMitigant PartnerGoogle PartnerTop 100 InnovatorMicrosoft AzureAmazon Web Services

BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment

Our Strengths

  • Comprehensive expertise in all aspects of BCBS-239 regulation
  • Proven assessment methodology with standardized evaluation criteria
  • Benchmark comparisons with best practices from successful implementations
  • Practice-oriented recommendations with concrete steps for action
⚠

Expert Tip

A comprehensive Readiness Assessment at the start of your BCBS-239 project can reduce implementation costs by up to 35% and significantly shorten the project timeline. It not only creates clarity about the current status, but also enables precise resource planning and budgeting.

ADVISORI in Numbers

11+

Years of Experience

120+

Employees

520+

Projects

Our BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment follows a structured methodology that covers all relevant dimensions of compliance and leads to a comprehensive evaluation.

Our Approach:

Initial inventory and collection of relevant documentation

Detailed analysis of risk data governance and processes

Assessment of IT architecture and data quality controls

Mapping against the 14 BCBS-239 principles and identification of gaps

Development of a prioritized roadmap with concrete measures

"The BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment by ADVISORI gave us a precise overview of our compliance status. The structured methodology and the practical recommendations enabled us to plan our implementation in a targeted manner and to address material risks at an early stage. An enormous added value for our overall project."
Andreas Krekel

Andreas Krekel

Head of Risk Management, Regulatory Reporting

Expertise & Experience:

10+ years of experience, SQL, R-Studio, BAIS-MSG, ABACUS, SAPBA, HPQC, JIRA, MS Office, SAS, Business Process Manager, IBM Operational Decision Management

LinkedIn Profile

Our Services

We offer you tailored solutions for your digital transformation

Comprehensive BCBS-239 Gap Analysis

We systematically assess your current compliance against all 14 BCBS-239 principles and identify gaps against regulatory requirements.

  • Detailed analysis against all BCBS-239 principles
  • Assessment of data governance and responsibilities
  • Analysis of risk data aggregation and architecture
  • Assessment of reporting processes and systems

BCBS-239 Implementation Roadmap

We develop a tailored roadmap for your BCBS-239 implementation with prioritized measures and an implementation plan.

  • Prioritization of areas of action by criticality
  • Development of concrete measures for gap closure
  • Detailed implementation planning and milestones
  • Resource and budget planning for the implementation

Looking for a complete overview of all our services?

View Complete Service Overview

Our Areas of Expertise in Regulatory Compliance Management

Our expertise in managing regulatory compliance and transformation, including DORA.

Apply for Banking License

Further information on applying for a banking license.

▼
    • Banking License Governance Organizational Structure
      • Banking License Supervisory Board Executive Roles
      • Banking License ICS Compliance Functions
      • Banking License Control Management Processes
    • Banking License Preliminary Study
      • Banking License Feasibility Business Plan
      • Banking License Capital Requirements Budgeting
      • Banking License Risk Opportunity Analysis
Basel III

Further information on Basel III.

▼
    • Basel III Implementation
      • Basel III Adaptation of Internal Risk Models
      • Basel III Implementation of Stress Tests Scenario Analyses
      • Basel III Reporting Compliance Procedures
    • Basel III Ongoing Compliance
      • Basel III Internal External Audit Support
      • Basel III Continuous Review of Metrics
      • Basel III Monitoring of Supervisory Changes
    • Basel III Readiness
      • Basel III Introduction of New Metrics Countercyclical Buffer Etc
      • Basel III Gap Analysis Implementation Roadmap
      • Basel III Capital and Liquidity Requirements Leverage Ratio LCR NSFR
BCBS 239

Further information on BCBS 239.

▼
    • BCBS 239 Implementation
      • BCBS 239 IT Process Adjustments
      • BCBS 239 Risk Data Aggregation Automated Reporting
      • BCBS 239 Testing Validation
    • BCBS 239 Ongoing Compliance
      • BCBS 239 Audit Pruefungsunterstuetzung
      • BCBS 239 Kontinuierliche Prozessoptimierung
      • BCBS 239 Monitoring KPI Tracking
    • BCBS 239 Readiness
      • BCBS 239 Data Governance Rollen
      • BCBS 239 Gap Analyse Zielbild
      • BCBS 239 Ist Analyse Datenarchitektur
CIS Controls

Weitere Informationen zu CIS Controls.

▼
    • CIS Controls Kontrolle Reifegradbewertung
    • CIS Controls Priorisierung Risikoanalys
    • CIS Controls Umsetzung Top 20 Controls
Cloud Compliance

Weitere Informationen zu Cloud Compliance.

▼
    • Cloud Compliance Audits Zertifizierungen ISO SOC2
    • Cloud Compliance Cloud Sicherheitsarchitektur SLA Management
    • Cloud Compliance Hybrid Und Multi Cloud Governance
CRA Cyber Resilience Act

Weitere Informationen zu CRA Cyber Resilience Act.

▼
    • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Conformity Assessment
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act CE Marking
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act External Audits
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Self Assessment
    • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Market Surveillance
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Corrective Actions
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Product Registration
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Regulatory Controls
    • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Product Security Requirements
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Security By Default
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Security By Design
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Update Management
      • CRA Cyber Resilience Act Vulnerability Management
CRR CRD

Weitere Informationen zu CRR CRD.

▼
    • CRR CRD Implementation
      • CRR CRD Offenlegungsanforderungen Pillar III
      • CRR CRD SREP Vorbereitung Dokumentation
    • CRR CRD Ongoing Compliance
      • CRR CRD Reporting Kommunikation Mit Aufsichtsbehoerden
      • CRR CRD Risikosteuerung Validierung
      • CRR CRD Schulungen Change Management
    • CRR CRD Readiness
      • CRR CRD Gap Analyse Prozesse Systeme
      • CRR CRD Kapital Liquiditaetsplanung ICAAP ILAAP
      • CRR CRD RWA Berechnung Methodik
Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung

Weitere Informationen zu Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung.

▼
    • Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung Grundlagen DSGVO BDSG
    • Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung Incident Management Meldepflichten
    • Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung Datenschutzprozesse Dokumentation
    • Datenschutzkoordinator Schulung Rollen Verantwortlichkeiten Koordinator Vs DPO
DORA Digital Operational Resilience Act

Stärken Sie Ihre digitale operationelle Widerstandsfähigkeit gemäß DORA.

▼
    • DORA Compliance
      • Audit Readiness
      • Control Implementation
      • Documentation Framework
      • Monitoring Reporting
      • Training Awareness
    • DORA Implementation
      • Gap Analyse Assessment
      • ICT Risk Management Framework
      • Implementation Roadmap
      • Incident Reporting System
      • Third Party Risk Management
    • DORA Requirements
      • Digital Operational Resilience Testing
      • ICT Incident Management
      • ICT Risk Management
      • ICT Third Party Risk
      • Information Sharing
DSGVO

Weitere Informationen zu DSGVO.

▼
    • DSGVO Implementation
      • DSGVO Datenschutz Folgenabschaetzung DPIA
      • DSGVO Prozesse Fuer Meldung Von Datenschutzverletzungen
      • DSGVO Technische Organisatorische Massnahmen
    • DSGVO Ongoing Compliance
      • DSGVO Laufende Audits Kontrollen
      • DSGVO Schulungen Awareness Programme
      • DSGVO Zusammenarbeit Mit Aufsichtsbehoerden
    • DSGVO Readiness
      • DSGVO Datenschutz Analyse Gap Assessment
      • DSGVO Privacy By Design Default
      • DSGVO Rollen Verantwortlichkeiten DPO Koordinator
EBA

Weitere Informationen zu EBA.

▼
    • EBA Guidelines Implementation
      • EBA FINREP COREP Anpassungen
      • EBA Governance Outsourcing ESG Vorgaben
      • EBA Self Assessments Gap Analysen
    • EBA Ongoing Compliance
      • EBA Mitarbeiterschulungen Sensibilisierung
      • EBA Monitoring Von EBA Updates
      • EBA Remediation Kontinuierliche Verbesserung
    • EBA SREP Readiness
      • EBA Dokumentations Und Prozessoptimierung
      • EBA Eskalations Kommunikationsstrukturen
      • EBA Pruefungsmanagement Follow Up
EU AI Act

Weitere Informationen zu EU AI Act.

▼
    • EU AI Act AI Compliance Framework
      • EU AI Act Algorithmic Assessment
      • EU AI Act Bias Testing
      • EU AI Act Ethics Guidelines
      • EU AI Act Quality Management
      • EU AI Act Transparency Requirements
    • EU AI Act AI Risk Classification
      • EU AI Act Compliance Requirements
      • EU AI Act Documentation Requirements
      • EU AI Act Monitoring Systems
      • EU AI Act Risk Assessment
      • EU AI Act System Classification
    • EU AI Act High Risk AI Systems
      • EU AI Act Data Governance
      • EU AI Act Human Oversight
      • EU AI Act Record Keeping
      • EU AI Act Risk Management System
      • EU AI Act Technical Documentation
FRTB

Weitere Informationen zu FRTB.

▼
    • FRTB Implementation
      • FRTB Marktpreisrisikomodelle Validierung
      • FRTB Reporting Compliance Framework
      • FRTB Risikodatenerhebung Datenqualitaet
    • FRTB Ongoing Compliance
      • FRTB Audit Unterstuetzung Dokumentation
      • FRTB Prozessoptimierung Schulungen
      • FRTB Ueberwachung Re Kalibrierung Der Modelle
    • FRTB Readiness
      • FRTB Auswahl Standard Approach Vs Internal Models
      • FRTB Gap Analyse Daten Prozesse
      • FRTB Neuausrichtung Handels Bankbuch Abgrenzung
ISO 27001

Weitere Informationen zu ISO 27001.

▼
    • ISO 27001 Internes Audit Zertifizierungsvorbereitung
    • ISO 27001 ISMS Einfuehrung Annex A Controls
    • ISO 27001 Reifegradbewertung Kontinuierliche Verbesserung
IT Grundschutz BSI

Weitere Informationen zu IT Grundschutz BSI.

▼
    • IT Grundschutz BSI BSI Standards Kompendium
    • IT Grundschutz BSI Frameworks Struktur Baustein Analyse
    • IT Grundschutz BSI Zertifizierungsbegleitung Audit Support
KRITIS

Weitere Informationen zu KRITIS.

▼
    • KRITIS Implementation
      • KRITIS Kontinuierliche Ueberwachung Incident Management
      • KRITIS Meldepflichten Behoerdenkommunikation
      • KRITIS Schutzkonzepte Physisch Digital
    • KRITIS Ongoing Compliance
      • KRITIS Prozessanpassungen Bei Neuen Bedrohungen
      • KRITIS Regelmaessige Tests Audits
      • KRITIS Schulungen Awareness Kampagnen
    • KRITIS Readiness
      • KRITIS Gap Analyse Organisation Technik
      • KRITIS Notfallkonzepte Ressourcenplanung
      • KRITIS Schwachstellenanalyse Risikobewertung
MaRisk

Weitere Informationen zu MaRisk.

▼
    • MaRisk Implementation
      • MaRisk Dokumentationsanforderungen Prozess Kontrollbeschreibungen
      • MaRisk IKS Verankerung
      • MaRisk Risikosteuerungs Tools Integration
    • MaRisk Ongoing Compliance
      • MaRisk Audit Readiness
      • MaRisk Schulungen Sensibilisierung
      • MaRisk Ueberwachung Reporting
    • MaRisk Readiness
      • MaRisk Gap Analyse
      • MaRisk Organisations Steuerungsprozesse
      • MaRisk Ressourcenkonzept Fach IT Kapazitaeten
MiFID

Weitere Informationen zu MiFID.

▼
    • MiFID Implementation
      • MiFID Anpassung Vertriebssteuerung Prozessablaeufe
      • MiFID Dokumentation IT Anbindung
      • MiFID Transparenz Berichtspflichten RTS 27 28
    • MiFID II Readiness
      • MiFID Best Execution Transaktionsueberwachung
      • MiFID Gap Analyse Roadmap
      • MiFID Produkt Anlegerschutz Zielmarkt Geeignetheitspruefung
    • MiFID Ongoing Compliance
      • MiFID Anpassung An Neue ESMA BAFIN Vorgaben
      • MiFID Fortlaufende Schulungen Monitoring
      • MiFID Regelmaessige Kontrollen Audits
NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Weitere Informationen zu NIST Cybersecurity Framework.

▼
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework Identify Protect Detect Respond Recover
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework Integration In Unternehmensprozesse
    • NIST Cybersecurity Framework Maturity Assessment Roadmap
NIS2

Weitere Informationen zu NIS2.

▼
    • NIS2 Readiness
      • NIS2 Compliance Roadmap
      • NIS2 Gap Analyse
      • NIS2 Implementation Strategy
      • NIS2 Risk Management Framework
      • NIS2 Scope Assessment
    • NIS2 Sector Specific Requirements
      • NIS2 Authority Communication
      • NIS2 Cross Border Cooperation
      • NIS2 Essential Entities
      • NIS2 Important Entities
      • NIS2 Reporting Requirements
    • NIS2 Security Measures
      • NIS2 Business Continuity Management
      • NIS2 Crisis Management
      • NIS2 Incident Handling
      • NIS2 Risk Analysis Systems
      • NIS2 Supply Chain Security
Privacy Program

Weitere Informationen zu Privacy Program.

▼
    • Privacy Program Drittdienstleistermanagement
      • Privacy Program Datenschutzrisiko Bewertung Externer Partner
      • Privacy Program Rezertifizierung Onboarding Prozesse
      • Privacy Program Vertraege AVV Monitoring Reporting
    • Privacy Program Privacy Controls Audit Support
      • Privacy Program Audit Readiness Pruefungsbegleitung
      • Privacy Program Datenschutzanalyse Dokumentation
      • Privacy Program Technische Organisatorische Kontrollen
    • Privacy Program Privacy Framework Setup
      • Privacy Program Datenschutzstrategie Governance
      • Privacy Program DPO Office Rollenverteilung
      • Privacy Program Richtlinien Prozesse
Regulatory Transformation Projektmanagement

Wir steuern Ihre regulatorischen Transformationsprojekte erfolgreich – von der Konzeption bis zur nachhaltigen Implementierung.

▼
    • Change Management Workshops Schulungen
    • Implementierung Neuer Vorgaben CRR KWG MaRisk BAIT IFRS Etc
    • Projekt Programmsteuerung
    • Prozessdigitalisierung Workflow Optimierung
Software Compliance

Weitere Informationen zu Software Compliance.

▼
    • Cloud Compliance Lizenzmanagement Inventarisierung Kommerziell OSS
    • Cloud Compliance Open Source Compliance Entwickler Schulungen
    • Cloud Compliance Prozessintegration Continuous Monitoring
TISAX VDA ISA

Weitere Informationen zu TISAX VDA ISA.

▼
    • TISAX VDA ISA Audit Vorbereitung Labeling
    • TISAX VDA ISA Automotive Supply Chain Compliance
    • TISAX VDA Self Assessment Gap Analyse
VS-NFD

Weitere Informationen zu VS-NFD.

▼
    • VS-NFD Implementation
      • VS-NFD Monitoring Regular Checks
      • VS-NFD Prozessintegration Schulungen
      • VS-NFD Zugangsschutz Kontrollsysteme
    • VS-NFD Ongoing Compliance
      • VS-NFD Audit Trails Protokollierung
      • VS-NFD Kontinuierliche Verbesserung
      • VS-NFD Meldepflichten Behoerdenkommunikation
    • VS-NFD Readiness
      • VS-NFD Dokumentations Sicherheitskonzept
      • VS-NFD Klassifizierung Kennzeichnung Verschlusssachen
      • VS-NFD Rollen Verantwortlichkeiten Definieren
ESG

Weitere Informationen zu ESG.

▼
    • ESG Assessment
    • ESG Audit
    • ESG CSRD
    • ESG Dashboard
    • ESG Datamanagement
    • ESG Due Diligence
    • ESG Governance
    • ESG Implementierung Ongoing ESG Compliance Schulungen Sensibilisierung Audit Readiness Kontinuierliche Verbesserung
    • ESG Kennzahlen
    • ESG KPIs Monitoring KPI Festlegung Benchmarking Datenmanagement Qualitaetssicherung
    • ESG Lieferkettengesetz
    • ESG Nachhaltigkeitsbericht
    • ESG Rating
    • ESG Rating Reporting GRI SASB CDP EU Taxonomie Kommunikation An Stakeholder Investoren
    • ESG Reporting
    • ESG Soziale Aspekte Lieferketten Lieferkettengesetz Menschenrechts Arbeitsstandards Diversity Inclusion
    • ESG Strategie
    • ESG Strategie Governance Leitbildentwicklung Stakeholder Dialog Verankerung In Unternehmenszielen
    • ESG Training
    • ESG Transformation
    • ESG Umweltmanagement Dekarbonisierung Klimaschutzprogramme Energieeffizienz CO2 Bilanzierung Scope 1 3
    • ESG Zertifizierung

Frequently Asked Questions about BCBS-239 Readiness

Why is a comprehensive BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment so business-critical for financial institutions, and how does ADVISORI support us in this?

The BCBS‑239 regulation places not only technical requirements on your risk data management, but fundamentally transforms the way your institution makes and manages critical risk decisions. A systematic readiness assessment is the key to successful compliance and simultaneously delivers strategic advantages that go far beyond mere regulatory fulfillment.

🔍 Strategic significance of a BCBS‑239 Readiness Assessment:

• Fundamental baseline: A precise status determination prevents costly misdevelopments and creates clarity on priorities and resource requirements.
• Risk minimization: Early identification of critical compliance gaps enables proactive management of regulatory risks and prevents potential sanctions.
• Resource optimization: A systematic gap analysis enables the precise allocation of budget and resources to the most critical areas of action.
• Change management preparation: Identifying necessary organizational changes paves the way for sustainable cultural transformation in risk data management.

💼 The ADVISORI approach to BCBS‑239 Readiness Assessment:

• Comprehensive perspective: We examine not only isolated technical systems, but the entire value chain of your risk data – from source data capture to board-level reporting.
• Regulatory depth of expertise: Our specialists have extensive experience with supervisory authority expectations and the

14 BCBS‑239 principles and their practical interpretation.

• Benchmark orientation: We compare your maturity level with best practices from successful implementations and industry standards.
• Practice-oriented roadmap: The result of our assessment is not a theoretical document, but a pragmatic, prioritized implementation plan with concrete recommendations for action.

How do we quantify the ROI of a BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment, and what sustainable competitive advantages result from it?

A BCBS‑239 Readiness Assessment is far more than a regulatory obligation – it is a strategic investment that generates significant quantifiable benefits and cost savings. Our experience shows that financial institutions that invest in a thorough readiness evaluation not only achieve compliance more efficiently, but also realize significant business advantages.

💰 Quantifiable ROI of a structured Readiness Assessment:

• Implementation cost reduction: Institutions without a structured assessment incur on average 30–45% higher total implementation costs due to subsequent adjustments, misallocation of resources, and inefficient prioritization.
• Shortened project timelines: A clear roadmap based on a well-founded gap analysis can reduce implementation time by 20–30% and accelerates the path to compliance.
• Avoidance of penalties: Early identification of critical compliance gaps minimizes the risk of regulatory sanctions, which can easily run into the millions.
• Reduced costs for manual processes: Identifying automation potential as part of the assessment can reduce manual effort in risk data aggregation by up to 40%.

🚀 Strategic competitive advantages beyond compliance:

• More precise risk control: Improved data quality and aggregation capabilities lead to more accurate risk analyses and better-informed strategic decisions.
• Increased agility: Optimizing the risk data architecture improves the ability to respond quickly to changing market conditions and to integrate new regulatory requirements.
• Stronger stakeholder confidence: Demonstrable progress in BCBS‑239 compliance strengthens the trust of supervisory authorities, investors, and rating agencies.
• Digital transformation: The data and process optimizations identified in the assessment form a solid foundation for further digitalization initiatives in risk management.

What critical gap areas does ADVISORI typically identify in a BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment, and how are these prioritized?

Our extensive experience with BCBS‑239 assessments at leading financial institutions has revealed recurring patterns of compliance gaps. These insights enable us to identify critical areas of action in a targeted manner and to carry out effective prioritization that takes into account both regulatory requirements and operational realities.

🧩 Typical critical gap areas in BCBS‑239 assessments:

• Data governance framework: Insufficient definition of data ownership, responsibilities, and quality standards for risk data across the entire lifecycle.
• Data lineage: Lack of transparency regarding the complete path of risk data from source to reporting level, particularly for manual process steps and complex transformations.
• Manual process breaks: Excessive use of manual workarounds, spreadsheets, and isolated data silos in critical risk data processes.
• IT architecture fragmentation: Historically grown, heterogeneous system landscapes without an integrated approach to risk data aggregation.
• Data quality controls: Absence of systematic mechanisms for measuring, monitoring, and improving risk data quality.

📊 ADVISORI's methodical approach to gap prioritization:

• Regulatory risk: Assessment of the compliance gap with regard to its criticality from a supervisory law perspective and potential regulatory consequences.
• Implementation complexity: Analysis of the required resource effort, technical complexity, and organizational challenges involved in closing specific gaps.
• Business impact: Assessment of the effects on critical business processes, risk management decisions, and strategic initiatives.
• Quick wins vs. structural measures: Identification of rapidly implementable improvements with high impact, and distinction from fundamental, longer-term transformation needs.

How does ADVISORI design the roadmap following a BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment, and which change management aspects are decisive for implementation success?

A BCBS‑239 Readiness Assessment culminates in a strategic roadmap that is far more than a mere list of technical measures. For sustainable implementation success, it is essential that this roadmap orchestrates both technological and organizational and cultural changes, while taking into account the specific starting position of your institution.

🗺 ️ Elements of an effective BCBS‑239 implementation roadmap:

• Measure prioritization with clear sequencing: We structure measures into logical dependencies and time phases – from quick wins through medium-term optimizations to fundamental structural changes.
• Resource and budget planning: Detailed estimation of the required investment, personnel resources, and specific competencies for each implementation phase.
• Governance structure: Definition of clear responsibilities, decision-making processes, and escalation paths for the BCBS‑239 implementation.
• Metrics and success indicators: Development of measurable KPIs for continuous monitoring of implementation progress and compliance improvement.

🔄 Critical change management factors for successful BCBS‑239 implementation:

• Executive sponsorship: Anchoring BCBS‑239 compliance as a strategic priority at the highest management level with clear C-level commitment.
• Cross-functional collaboration: Establishing effective cooperation models between risk management, IT, business units, and compliance to overcome siloed thinking.
• Competency development: Systematic training and awareness programs to embed understanding of the principles and requirements of BCBS‑239 throughout the organization.
• Cultural change in risk data management: Promoting a culture of data quality and accountability across all hierarchical levels, from data capture to board level.

What technical challenges in data architecture are typically identified in a BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment, and how does ADVISORI support in overcoming them?

Technical data architecture frequently represents one of the greatest challenges in BCBS‑239 compliance. Historically grown, fragmented IT landscapes in financial institutions make consistent, timely, and precise risk data aggregation more difficult. Our Readiness Assessment systematically identifies these technical weaknesses and offers a structured approach to overcoming them.

🏗 ️ Typical technical challenges in data architecture:

• Data silo problem: Isolated risk data repositories without seamless integration, requiring manual consolidation processes and causing inconsistencies.
• Heterogeneous data models: Different data definitions, taxonomies, and attributes for the same risk concepts across various systems.
• Legacy system dependencies: Outdated core systems that manage critical risk data but do not support modern API interfaces or real-time data extraction.
• Insufficient data lineage: Absence of technical mechanisms for seamless tracking of data flows and transformations from source to report.
• Limited metadata management: Insufficient technical structures for managing and utilizing metadata for risk data.

⚙ ️ ADVISORI's technology-oriented solution approach:

• Architectural reference models: We develop target architectures that reflect best practices for BCBS‑239-compliant risk data platforms and outline implementation paths.
• Data integration strategy: Identification and recommendation of suitable technologies and patterns for the seamless integration of heterogeneous data sources (e.g., data virtualization, service-oriented architectures, API management).
• Modern data platform concepts: Evaluation of innovative technological approaches such as Data Mesh, Data Fabric, or cloud-based data solutions for BCBS‑239 compliance.
• Technical metadata management: Design of metadata repositories and tools for the systematic capture and use of metadata for data quality and lineage.

What methodology does ADVISORI use in the gap analysis of the 14 BCBS-239 principles, and how is an institution's maturity level objectified?

Our gap analysis methodology for BCBS‑239 combines deep regulatory expertise with a structured, standardized assessment approach. We move away from subjective assessments and rely on an evidence-based evaluation methodology that enables objective maturity level determination while simultaneously providing detailed insights into specific areas of action.

📋 ADVISORI's structured BCBS‑239 assessment methodology:

• Principle-based assessment framework: Our detailed assessment matrix covers all

14 BCBS‑239 principles and breaks them down into more than

120 specific evaluation points that precisely identify compliance gaps.

• Evidence-based assessment: Each assessment point is evaluated on the basis of concrete evidence and artifacts, not on the basis of subjective opinions or self-assessments.
• Multi-dimensional analysis: In addition to compliance conformity, we also assess the depth of implementation, scalability, and sustainability of existing solutions.
• Supervisory law perspective: Our evaluation criteria reflect the actual expectations of supervisory authorities based on our experience from numerous BCBS‑239 audits and reviews.

📊 Maturity model and benchmarking:

• 5-level maturity model: Each of the

14 principles is assessed on a standardized scale from

1 (Initial/Ad-hoc) to

5 (Optimized/Leading), with clear criteria for each maturity level.

• Weighted aggregation: Individual assessments are weighted by regulatory criticality and business relevance to determine a meaningful overall maturity level.
• Visual heat mapping: Graphical presentation of results in the form of heat maps that identify critical areas of action at a glance.
• Industry comparison: Anonymized comparison of your results with benchmark data from our extensive experience with comparable financial institutions.

To what extent does a BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment address the specific requirements for data quality management, and what concrete measures does ADVISORI recommend?

Data quality is a central element of BCBS‑239 compliance and forms the basis for trustworthy risk reports and well-informed decisions. Our Readiness Assessment systematically examines the maturity of your data quality management and identifies concrete improvement potentials that go beyond purely technical aspects and also encompass organizational and process-related dimensions.

🔎 Core aspects of our data quality assessment in the BCBS‑239 Assessment:

• Framework analysis: Assessment of the completeness and effectiveness of your data quality framework with regard to defined standards, metrics, and thresholds for risk data.
• Process integration: Examination of the extent to which data quality controls are integrated into regular data processes, rather than occurring as downstream, separate activities.
• Governance effectiveness: Evaluation of the clarity of roles and responsibilities for data quality across the entire data lifecycle.
• Metrics and monitoring: Analysis of the mechanisms for continuous measurement, monitoring, and reporting on the data quality of risk data.

✅ Concrete recommendations for BCBS‑239-compliant data quality management:

• Dimension-based quality definition: Implementation of a multi-dimensional quality model that systematically covers all relevant aspects (accuracy, completeness, consistency, timeliness, adaptability, granularity).
• Automated quality controls: Introduction of technical solutions for automated data quality checks at critical points in the data processing chain with rule-based validations.
• End-to-end quality reporting: Development of a multi-level reporting system for data quality that addresses both operational and management and board levels.
• Incident management: Establishment of a structured process for the detection, analysis, remediation, and tracking of data quality issues.

How does a BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment address the increasing requirements for integrated risk data governance, and what best practices does ADVISORI recommend?

Effective risk data governance forms the organizational foundation for sustainable BCBS‑239 compliance. Our Readiness Assessment examines in detail the extent to which your existing governance structures meet the comprehensive regulatory requirements and identifies concrete improvement potentials for a sustainable anchoring of data accountability in your organization.

🏛 ️ Central governance aspects in the BCBS‑239 Readiness Assessment:

• Organizational structure: Evaluation of the existing data governance organization with regard to coverage of all BCBS‑239-relevant areas of responsibility and decision-making bodies.
• Roles and responsibilities: Analysis of the definition, documentation, and practical implementation of data roles such as Data Owner, Data Steward, and Data Custodian in the context of risk data.
• Policies and standards: Assessment of the completeness, currency, and effectiveness of your regulatory framework for risk data management.
• Decision-making and escalation processes: Examination of established mechanisms for handling data quality issues, change requests, and conflicts in risk data management.

📖 Best practices for BCBS‑239-compliant data governance:

• Integrated governance model: Implementation of a comprehensive data governance model that clearly defines both vertical (from board to operational level) and horizontal (across all relevant business units) responsibilities.
• Chief Data Officer (CDO): Establishment of a central leadership role with a direct reporting line to senior management, bearing overarching responsibility for risk data quality.
• Data Stewardship Council: Creation of a cross-functional body with representatives from all relevant business units that coordinates standards, processes, and data quality initiatives.
• Business data ownership: Consistent anchoring of data accountability in the business units through clearly defined Data Owner roles with corresponding competencies and resources.

What project strategy does ADVISORI recommend for implementing the BCBS-239 measures identified in the Readiness Assessment?

Implementing the BCBS‑239 requirements represents a complex transformation program for many financial institutions that goes far beyond a pure IT project. Based on the results of the Readiness Assessment, we develop a tailored implementation strategy that both fulfills the regulatory requirements and takes into account the specific conditions of your institution.

📈 Strategic implementation approaches following the Readiness Assessment:

• Iterative value delivery: We structure the implementation into manageable releases with standalone business value, rather than relying on a big-bang approach that delivers value only late in the process.
• Prioritized measure cascade: Sequencing of measures according to a strategic logic – from fundamental foundations (data models, governance) through technical enablers (architectures, infrastructure) to specific use cases.
• Agile hybrid methodology: Combination of agile methods for development aspects with classic project management for overarching control and coordination of complex dependencies.
• Integrated workstream model: Parallelization of complementary work packages in coordinated workstreams (e.g., data governance, architecture, reporting, data quality).

🛠 ️ Success factors for BCBS‑239 implementation:

• Dedicated program organization: Establishment of an effective program structure with clear decision-making paths and sufficient resources.
• Business-IT alignment: Close integration of business units and IT through joint teams and collaborative working models.
• Stakeholder management: Systematic involvement of all relevant interest groups, particularly senior management and supervisory contacts.
• Continuous success measurement: Establishment of meaningful progress reporting with KPIs that measure both implementation progress and actual compliance improvement.

How does a BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment integrate the requirements for reporting processes, and what optimization potentials are typically identified?

Risk reporting is at the center of the BCBS‑239 guidelines, as it forms the interface between data infrastructure and decision-makers. Our Readiness Assessment analyzes your reporting processes in detail and identifies optimization potentials that not only contribute to regulatory compliance but also increase the strategic value of your risk reporting.

📑 Key aspects of the reporting analysis in the BCBS‑239 Assessment:

• Process efficiency: Evaluation of end-to-end reporting processes with regard to throughput times, degree of automation, and manual interventions in report generation.
• Data consistency: Assessment of consistency between different risk reports, particularly for overlapping metrics and dimensions.
• Aggregation capabilities: Analysis of the possibilities for flexible aggregation and drill-down analysis of risk data across various dimensions (e.g., legal entities, business lines, risk types).
• Documentation and traceability: Review of the documentation of reporting processes, calculation methods, and validation steps.

📊 Typical optimization potentials in reporting processes:

• Automation of manual process breaks: Identification and elimination of manual interventions and Excel-based intermediate steps in report generation.
• Harmonization of report definitions: Standardization of metrics, dimensions, and calculation methods across different risk reports.
• Self-service reporting capabilities: Implementation of flexible analysis tools that enable decision-makers to analyze risk data according to their own requirements, without being limited to predefined reports.
• Integrated data validation: Establishment of systematic validation processes that take place during data aggregation, rather than as a separate, downstream activity.

How does ADVISORI support preparation for regulatory audits and reviews following the BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment?

Regulatory review of BCBS‑239 compliance represents a considerable challenge for many financial institutions. Following completion of the Readiness Assessment, we support you in a targeted manner in preparing for supervisory audits and reviews, in order to present your compliance progress optimally and to proactively address potential weaknesses.

🔍 Systematic preparation for regulatory audits:

• Gap prioritization from a supervisory perspective: Assessment and prioritization of identified gaps from the perspective of supervisory authorities, in order to identify critical areas of action with heightened audit focus.
• Building an evidence library: Systematic compilation and organization of all relevant evidence and documentation that demonstrates the BCBS‑239 compliance of your institution.
• Mock audits and readiness tests: Conducting simulated audits with experienced former regulators to identify and address potential weaknesses at an early stage.
• Stakeholder coaching: Preparation of your specialist and management staff for supervisory interviews and presentations, with targeted coaching on typical audit focus areas.

📋 Key elements of successful audit preparation:

• Complete traceability: Ensuring seamless traceability from supervisory requirements through your implementation measures to the concrete evidence.
• Narrative development: Elaboration of a coherent narrative that convincingly presents your BCBS‑239 compliance journey, milestones achieved, and strategic vision.
• Weakness management: Proactive identification and addressing of potential points of criticism with clear action plans for still-open compliance gaps.
• Stakeholder alignment: Ensuring a uniform understanding and consistent communication across all involved areas.

To what extent does a BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment address the requirements for IT architecture and data lineage, and what solution approaches does ADVISORI recommend?

IT architecture and seamless data lineage are fundamental enablers for sustainable BCBS‑239 compliance. Our Readiness Assessment systematically evaluates your existing architectures and lineage capabilities and identifies targeted optimization potentials for efficient risk data aggregation and tracking.

🔄 Core aspects of the architecture and lineage assessment:

• End-to-end data flow analysis: Assessment of the completeness and transparency of data flows from source systems to risk reports, including all transformation and aggregation steps.
• Architecture maturity: Analysis of the capability of your IT architecture to support the BCBS‑239 requirements with regard to speed, flexibility, and consistency of risk data aggregation.
• Technical data integrity: Evaluation of the technical measures to ensure data integrity across the entire data lifecycle.
• Metadata management: Assessment of your capabilities for the systematic capture, management, and use of metadata for risk data.

🛠 ️ Modern solution approaches for optimized architecture and lineage:

• Modular data architecture: Design of a flexible, service-oriented architecture that overcomes data silos and enables seamless integration of heterogeneous data sources.
• Automated data lineage: Implementation of tools and technologies for the automated capture and visualization of data flows, at both the technical and business levels.
• Semantic data layer: Establishment of a unified semantic layer that ensures consistent definitions and interpretations of risk metrics across different applications.
• Integrated metadata repository: Construction of a central metadata hub that captures both technical and business metadata and serves as a single source of truth for data governance.

How does ADVISORI help harmonize BCBS-239 requirements with other regulatory requirements such as DORA, BAIT, or MaRisk?

Financial institutions face the challenge of efficiently implementing a large number of overlapping regulatory requirements. Our BCBS‑239 Readiness Assessment systematically takes into account synergies and dependencies with other regulations in order to avoid duplication of effort and enable an integrated compliance approach.

🔄 Integrated regulatory approach in the Readiness Assessment:

• Regulatory mapping: Identification of overlaps and complementarities between BCBS‑239 and other relevant regulations such as DORA, BAIT, MaRisk, TRIM, or BCBS‑454.
• Requirements consolidation: Development of a consolidated requirements map that eliminates redundancies and identifies common compliance objectives.
• Prioritized gap analysis: Assessment of compliance gaps taking into account multiple regulatory requirements and their implementation deadlines.
• Regulatory horizon scan: Early identification of emerging regulatory trends and requirements that should be integrated into the implementation strategy.

🛠 ️ ADVISORI's harmonization approach for regulatory compliance:

• Common control framework: Development of an integrated control framework that covers the requirements of various regulations and minimizes duplication of effort in compliance documentation.
• Regulatory roadmap: Creation of a synchronized implementation plan that takes into account various regulatory timelines and proactively addresses dependencies.
• Platform approach: Design of modular, reusable solution components that can be used for various regulatory requirements (e.g., data governance framework, lineage solutions).
• Coordinated implementation strategy: Orchestration of various regulatory projects under an overarching governance approach in order to maximize synergies and deploy resources efficiently.

What concrete advantages does a BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment offer for a supervisory inspection by BaFin, ECB, or other regulators?

Supervisory inspections for BCBS‑239 compliance are becoming increasingly intensive and detailed. A well-founded Readiness Assessment not only provides an inventory, but also systematically prepares your institution for regulatory audits, minimizes compliance risks, and strengthens your position vis-à-vis supervisory authorities.

🔍 Concrete advantages for supervisory inspections:

• Comprehensive evidence documentation: Systematic identification and preparation of all required evidence and documentation needed during an inspection by BaFin, ECB, or other supervisory authorities.
• Prioritization of critical areas of action: Focus on those compliance gaps that are particularly critical from a supervisory perspective and that typically take center stage during inspections.
• Stakeholder preparation: Targeted preparation of specialist and management staff for typical audit situations, interviews, and evidence requirements from supervisory authorities.
• Proactive weakness management: Early identification of potential points of criticism and development of convincing action plans to address still-existing compliance gaps.

🛡 ️ Strategic value in supervisory dialogue:

• Strengthening governance evidence: Demonstration of a structured and comprehensive governance approach for BCBS‑239 that underscores the seriousness of your compliance efforts.
• Evidence-based progress presentation: Provision of quantifiable and objective evidence of your compliance progress since previous inspections or self-assessments.
• Roadmap transparency: Presentation of a convincing, realistic, and prioritized implementation plan for still-open compliance requirements.
• Benchmark comparisons: Classification of your compliance maturity in the industry context, based on anonymized comparative data from similar institutions.

How does a BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment address the increasing requirements for stress testing and crisis scenarios in risk data management?

The ability to deliver aggregated and reliable risk data quickly in stress and crisis scenarios is at the center of the BCBS‑239 requirements. Our Readiness Assessment systematically evaluates your stress testing capabilities and develops measures to strengthen your data infrastructure for crisis situations, in which precise risk information is particularly critical.

🧪 Core aspects of the stress testing assessment in the BCBS‑239 Assessment:

• Data availability under stress: Analysis of the ability to aggregate and report high-quality risk data within accelerated timeframes and under increased pressure.
• Scenario flexibility: Assessment of the ability to integrate new and previously unanticipated scenarios and dimensions into risk reporting.
• Process robustness: Review of the stability and reliability of data processes under increased volume, frequency, and complexity requirements in stress situations.
• Escalation mechanisms: Evaluation of defined processes and responsibilities for data quality issues and validation requirements in crisis scenarios.

⚡ Optimization approaches for crisis-resilient risk data management:

• Flexible data models: Development of adaptive data models that can be quickly extended by new dimensions and parameters without requiring fundamental architectural changes.
• Automated control mechanisms: Implementation of automated data quality controls that enable reliable validations even under time pressure and minimize manual interventions.
• Accelerated processes: Definition of dedicated, optimized processes for crisis situations that identify critical paths and exclude non-essential steps in emergency situations.
• End-to-end simulations: Conducting regular emergency exercises that test the entire risk data aggregation and reporting chain under realistic stress conditions.

How does ADVISORI support the integration of new technologies such as AI, ML, or cloud solutions into the BCBS-239 compliance strategy?

Innovative technologies offer considerable potential for improving BCBS‑239 compliance, but also present new challenges with regard to governance, transparency, and control. Our Readiness Assessment specifically evaluates opportunities for the strategic use of modern technologies and develops recommendations for their compliant integration into your risk data architecture.

🚀 Technology potentials in the BCBS‑239 context:

• AI/ML for data quality: Identification of use cases for machine learning for the automated detection of data quality issues, anomalies, and inconsistencies in risk data.
• Advanced analytics: Assessment of potentials for advanced analytical methods to improve risk predictions, scenario analyses, and early warning indicators.
• Cloud-based data platforms: Analysis of the possibilities for scalable, flexible cloud solutions for risk data aggregation, taking into account regulatory requirements.
• Process automation: Identification of process steps in risk data processing that can be optimized through Robotic Process Automation (RPA) or low-code platforms.

⚖ ️ Regulation-compliant use of technology:

• Compliance by design: Development of principles and guidelines for the integration of new technologies that take regulatory requirements into account from the outset.
• Explainable AI: Recommendations for the use of AI models with sufficient transparency and traceability to meet regulatory requirements.
• Hybrid cloud strategies: Design of cloud operating models that combine regulatory requirements for data security, localization, and control with the flexibility advantages of the cloud.
• Technology governance: Extension of existing governance frameworks to include specific controls and responsibilities for the use of new technologies in risk data management.

What critical success factors has ADVISORI identified in successful BCBS-239 implementations, and how are these taken into account in the Readiness Assessment?

Based on our extensive experience with BCBS‑239 projects, we have identified central success factors that make the difference between successful and problematic implementations. Our Readiness Assessment systematically evaluates these critical success factors and provides concrete recommendations for optimizing your implementation strategy.

🌟 Critical success factors for BCBS‑239 implementations:

• Management commitment: The degree of active engagement and support from senior management and upper leadership levels is decisive for overcoming organizational hurdles.
• Business-IT alignment: Close collaboration between business units and the IT organization across all project phases is essential for the development of practical solutions.
• Comprehensive governance framework: A comprehensive governance model with clear responsibilities and decision-making processes forms the foundation for sustainable compliance.
• Balanced scope: The right balance between technical, process-related, and organizational measures determines the effectiveness of the implementation.

📋 Assessment integration of these success factors:

• Stakeholder analysis: Systematic assessment of the engagement and alignment of relevant stakeholders at all organizational levels.
• Organizational maturity measurement: Evaluation of existing structures, processes, and capabilities to support the BCBS‑239 implementation.
• Change readiness assessment: Analysis of the willingness and ability of your organization to change with regard to the necessary transformations.
• Implementation risks: Early identification of potential stumbling blocks and development of preventive measures to minimize risk.

How does ADVISORI support the development of a risk-data-based corporate culture as the foundation for sustainable BCBS-239 compliance?

Sustainable BCBS‑239 compliance requires more than technical solutions and defined processes – it is fundamentally based on a risk-data-oriented corporate culture. Our Readiness Assessment explicitly takes into account cultural and change management aspects and develops measures to promote a data quality culture in your organization.

🧠 Cultural dimensions in the BCBS‑239 Readiness Assessment:

• Data awareness: Evaluation of the understanding of the importance of high-quality risk data at all organizational levels, from data capture to senior management.
• Accountability culture: Assessment of the acceptance and perception of data accountability in business units and IT teams.
• Collaboration structures: Analysis of cross-functional collaboration and communication with regard to risk data and data quality.
• Error culture: Examination of how data quality issues are handled and the willingness for continuous improvement.

🌱 Measures for developing a risk-data-based culture:

• Executive sponsorship programs: Design of targeted measures to activate and engage management as visible champions for data quality.
• Awareness and training: Development of training and awareness programs tailored to different target groups and their specific roles in risk data management.
• Community building: Recommendations for establishing communities of practice or expert networks for continuous exchange on data quality topics.
• Incentive systems: Analysis and recommendations for integrating data quality aspects into performance evaluation and incentive systems in order to promote the desired behaviors.

How does ADVISORI address the requirements for data modeling and semantic consistency for risk data in the BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment?

Consistent data models and a uniform semantic interpretation of risk data are fundamental prerequisites for successful BCBS‑239 compliance. Our Readiness Assessment systematically analyzes your existing data modeling practices and identifies optimization potentials for a harmonized and semantically coherent risk data landscape.

📊 Key aspects of the data model analysis in the Assessment:

• Semantic consistency: Assessment of the uniformity of risk data definitions, taxonomies, and classifications across different data sources and systems.
• Data model granularity: Analysis of the level of detail and dimensionality of your data models in relation to regulatory requirements and business analysis needs.
• Metadata management: Evaluation of existing practices and tools for managing metadata for risk data.
• Modeling governance: Assessment of the processes and responsibilities for the development, approval, and modification of data models.

🔄 Recommendations for optimized data modeling:

• Enterprise data model: Development of an enterprise-wide reference data model for risk data that serves as a single source of truth for semantic definitions.
• Business glossaries: Establishment of a central business glossary that provides uniform definitions for risk terms, metrics, and dimensions.
• Semantic layer: Implementation of a semantic layer architecture that integrates heterogeneous data sources via consistent conceptual models.
• Modeling standards: Introduction of binding standards and best practices for data modeling that take into account both technical and business aspects.

How does ADVISORI's BCBS-239 Readiness Assessment support financial institutions in transitioning from reactive compliance to proactive risk control?

The BCBS‑239 guidelines offer a unique opportunity to go beyond mere regulatory compliance and initiate a fundamental transformation of risk data management. Our Readiness Assessment focuses not only on compliance requirements, but also specifically identifies potentials for using risk data as a strategic asset for improved risk control.

🔁 Transition from reactive compliance to strategic value:

• Strategic repositioning: Assessment of the extent to which your current BCBS‑239 approach is positioned as a pure compliance exercise or as a strategic transformation.
• Business value identification: Systematic analysis of business advantages beyond compliance, such as improved decision-making, more efficient capital allocation, and more precise risk predictions.
• Risk data capitalization: Evaluation of opportunities to leverage investments in BCBS‑239 for further data and analytics initiatives.
• Innovation readiness: Assessment of your ability to develop innovative risk control approaches on the basis of improved data foundations.

🚀 ADVISORI's transformation approach in the Assessment:

• Value case development: Identification and quantification of specific business advantages that can be realized through improved risk data aggregation and reporting.
• Capability building strategy: Development of a roadmap for the continuous development of advanced risk data analysis and control capabilities.
• Integrated roadmap: Design of an integrated implementation plan that both fulfills compliance requirements and realizes strategic business advantages.
• Cultural transformation: Recommendations for developing a data-driven risk culture that promotes proactive identification and management of emerging risks.

Success Stories

Discover how we support companies in their digital transformation

Generative KI in der Fertigung

Bosch

KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz

Fallstudie
BOSCH KI-Prozessoptimierung für bessere Produktionseffizienz

Ergebnisse

Reduzierung der Implementierungszeit von AI-Anwendungen auf wenige Wochen
Verbesserung der Produktqualität durch frühzeitige Fehlererkennung
Steigerung der Effizienz in der Fertigung durch reduzierte Downtime

AI Automatisierung in der Produktion

Festo

Intelligente Vernetzung für zukunftsfähige Produktionssysteme

Fallstudie
FESTO AI Case Study

Ergebnisse

Verbesserung der Produktionsgeschwindigkeit und Flexibilität
Reduzierung der Herstellungskosten durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung
Erhöhung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch personalisierte Produkte

KI-gestützte Fertigungsoptimierung

Siemens

Smarte Fertigungslösungen für maximale Wertschöpfung

Fallstudie
Case study image for KI-gestützte Fertigungsoptimierung

Ergebnisse

Erhebliche Steigerung der Produktionsleistung
Reduzierung von Downtime und Produktionskosten
Verbesserung der Nachhaltigkeit durch effizientere Ressourcennutzung

Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel

Klöckner & Co

Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel

Fallstudie
Digitalisierung im Stahlhandel - Klöckner & Co

Ergebnisse

Über 2 Milliarden Euro Umsatz jährlich über digitale Kanäle
Ziel, bis 2022 60% des Umsatzes online zu erzielen
Verbesserung der Kundenzufriedenheit durch automatisierte Prozesse

Let's

Work Together!

Is your organization ready for the next step into the digital future? Contact us for a personal consultation.

Your strategic success starts here

Our clients trust our expertise in digital transformation, compliance, and risk management

Ready for the next step?

Schedule a strategic consultation with our experts now

30 Minutes • Non-binding • Immediately available

For optimal preparation of your strategy session:

Your strategic goals and challenges
Desired business outcomes and ROI expectations
Current compliance and risk situation
Stakeholders and decision-makers in the project

Prefer direct contact?

Direct hotline for decision-makers

Strategic inquiries via email

Detailed Project Inquiry

For complex inquiries or if you want to provide specific information in advance

ADVISORI Logo
BlogCase StudiesAbout Us
info@advisori.de+49 69 913 113-01